→Folta talk comment: new section |
→Folta talk comment: reiterate |
||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
Dear Silverseren, thanks for your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AKevin_Folta&type=revision&diff=681030691&oldid=681025721 comment]. could you please move it under the section I started - it was an edit conflict - we both wrote at the same time ! Thank you . --[[User:Wuerzele|Wuerzele]] ([[User talk:Wuerzele|talk]]) 19:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC) |
Dear Silverseren, thanks for your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AKevin_Folta&type=revision&diff=681030691&oldid=681025721 comment]. could you please move it under the section I started - it was an edit conflict - we both wrote at the same time ! Thank you . --[[User:Wuerzele|Wuerzele]] ([[User talk:Wuerzele|talk]]) 19:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
: for transparency '''please''' move your comment in the appropriate section, the one I started. what is so difficult about that ? I will move it, if you dont.--[[User:Wuerzele|Wuerzele]] ([[User talk:Wuerzele|talk]]) 19:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:49, 14 September 2015
Silverseren |
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Well...here's my talk page. If anyone has questions about an edit I did, please put it here.
--Silver seren 14:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
DYK for Oleogustus
Gatoclass (talk) 16:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Question about periodic table layout
Hi! Thanks for your question at the Elements Project about the placement of the lanthanides, actinides, and group 3 at Wikipedia's periodic table. Nature published a good news item on the table layout here at the same time that they published the paper with with lawrencium ionization data. The news article does a great job explaining the situation in a brief way, and notice how Sato, the lead author of the Lawrencium article, wrote that he didn't think his team's paper answered the layout issue in either direction. However, there have been many reasons to not include lanthanum and actinium in group 3 for many years, so Professor Poliakoff's statement is also understandable. I changed Wikipedia's table in 2005 to remove these two elements from group 3 and make Wikipedia's table "not-wrong" (in Poliakoff's view), and Wikipedia's table has been mostly not-wrong since then, although there are still multiple ways to be not-wrong. You can read about that at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Flying_Jazz#Starting_in_June.2C_2005:_Periodic_Table_and_other_chemical_matters . I'm answering on your talk page instead of on the Elements Project page because I've found that the tiny number of editors in that project repeatedly misrepresent the words of other editors and even the plain text of authors in the literature, so I don't contribute there any longer.
The organization that might at some point put out a nomenclature recommendation is IUPAC. The IUPAC meeting referred to in the Nature news item took place just last week ([1]), but I haven't heard any news yet about IUPAC addressing this group 3 issue, and I'd be surprised if they issue any recommendation about it. With time, I think the 32-column form of the table with lutetium and lawrencium in group 3 will gain in popularity, but that's an editorial decision for every book and web page to make. Flying Jazz (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Here is further information that I found earlier today (assuming that you're interested) about IUPAC's lack of interest in the question . Flying Jazz (talk) 00:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Trypophobia
I've fixed the archive numbering for the talk page (couldn't get the links to show up on the current talk page) and so modified the link in your post here. Hope you don't mind. --NeilN talk to me 00:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Civility
Please do make up motives about my editing such as your did here "You are being purposefully disingenuous and I think you are aware that you are." Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject TAFI
Hello, Silver seren. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement, a project dedicated to significantly improving articles with collaborative editing in a week's time.
Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Article nomination board. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 14:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC) |
– Thanks for joining the project! North America1000 01:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 10:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ww2censor (talk) 10:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2015)
A Old Colony Mennonite family observing the practice of plain dress
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Historic house • Soufflé Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
DYK for Grace Eldering
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Lucille Farrier Stickel
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2015)
Two high divers in mid-air
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Plain dress • Historic house Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2015)
Transection of a human head
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: High diving • Plain dress Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Folta talk comment
Dear Silverseren, thanks for your comment. could you please move it under the section I started - it was an edit conflict - we both wrote at the same time ! Thank you . --Wuerzele (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)