m Notice of discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (TW) |
→Notice: tban |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
== Notice == |
== Notice == |
||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#ScratchMarshall promoting conspiracy theories|ScratchMarshall promoting conspiracy theories]]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> - [[user:MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 🖋 18:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC) |
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#ScratchMarshall promoting conspiracy theories|ScratchMarshall promoting conspiracy theories]]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> - [[user:MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 🖋 18:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban== |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg |
|||
|imagesize=50px |
|||
|1=The following [[WP:TBAN|topic ban]] now applies to you: |
|||
{{Talkquote|1=You are indefinitely topic-banned from editing in the BLP topic area, specifically "any edit in any article with biographical content relating to living or recently deceased people, or any edit relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles of any page in any namespace".}} |
|||
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=828626868#ScratchMarshall_promoting_conspiracy_theories this discussion]. |
|||
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2018|log of sanctions]]. Please go to [[WP:TBAN]] and read the information there to see what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, to enforce the ban. |
|||
If you wish to appeal against the ban, please say so below or on [[User talk:NeilN|my talk page]] and I will explain how to do it.<!-- Template:AE sanction/topicban.--> [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 19:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
Revision as of 19:24, 3 March 2018
Final warning
If you post WP:BLP policy violating content like this anywhere on Wikipedia again, I will seek sanctions at WP:AE. You have been repeatedly told not to use Wikipedia for this purpose before. No more warnings.- MrX 🖋 20:27, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Stoneman Douglas talk
If you feel I'm being a bit dickly today, you're probably right. But we don't use article talk to blue-sky about what it would be nice to include if we could find sources for it. We find the sources for what we think it would be nice to include and we bring them to article talk for discussion. Nobody is better than you at searching, and you're the one who thinks these things would be nice to include. ―Mandruss ☎ 22:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (CLOUD Act) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating CLOUD Act, ScratchMarshall!
Wikipedia editor L235 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your work here!
To reply, leave a comment on L235's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Shooting drill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
per WP:TNT. There are probably notable concepts called "Shooting drill", but the existing page is so bad as to hinder navigation.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:16, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Acroterion (talk) 03:33, 3 March 2018 (UTC)- Reposting defamatory speculation verbatim is a gross violation of BLP. Veiling it as discussion of conspiracy theories doesn't make it complaint with policy. I'll give thought tomorrow to whether we need to impose arbitration enforcement sanctions. Acroterion (talk) 03:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Notice to anyone else interested: Acroterion is not an uninvolved admin. In special:diff/798752997 you can see that on September 3, Acroterian falsely accused me of making a personal attack against Valarian in special:diff/798752389 when I was only criticizing V's behavior. Prior to that, you can see at Talk:Unite_the_Right_rally/Archive_6#Murder_and_Terrorism_categories that Acroterion was already participating in a talk page section I created which MrX was also involved in, where Acroterion falsely accused me of POV-pushing:
- "Otherwise, ScratchMarshal's attempts to impose their interpretation of BLPCRIME has been a form of POV pushing"
You can see at Talk:Unite_the_Right_rally/Archive_7 that Acroterion is still involved in that topic which he issued warnings against me in after voicing disagreements with me in the discussion.
My behavior was in accordance of WP:BLPCRIME which prohibits us from saying people did crimes prior to a guilty conviction in them.
I won't bother appealing for an unblock for something only 48 hours, but am voicing my strong objection to it. Considering how involved has been with me in the past, I believe he should leave disciplinary action decisions to uninvolved moderators.
The same goes for MrX and his reverting my talk page contributions.
@Acroterion: if you think you can get away with false accusations like this:
- Reposting defamatory speculation verbatim
Your behavior will eventually come to light.
If you think you can get away with false accusations like this:
- Veiling it as discussion of conspiracy theories doesn't make it complaint with policy
Your harassment towards others will eventually be observed.
I am not "veiling" anything. I posted a source from WUSA 9 (which appears to be a reliable source) and it was deleted.
People can see from the history that you have attempted to hide the truth by using strikethrough on the diffs.
Eliana Block's February 21st article on wusa9 is not "defamatory speculation" or "a discussion of conspiracy theories". Both of your summaries are misleading.
Something titled "here's why David Hogg and other Florida students are not 'crisis actors'" is clearly debunking theories, not merely "discussing" them.
This issue is already discussed in the article's main space so there is absolutely nothing controversial about posting similar sources in the talk page:
- Tessa Lyons, a product manager at Facebook, said that “Hoax images that attack the victims of last week’s tragedy in Florida are abhorrent,” and further said “We are removing this content from Facebook" after the site announced that it will remove posts that wrongly claim that Hogg and other students are crisis actors.
- cited to "'Abhorrent' Hoax Facebook Posts Are Claiming the Florida School Shooting Survivors Are 'Crisis Actors'" from TIME, February 21
- On Facebook and Instagram, hundreds of posts and images perpetuating these falsehoods were found under the hashtag #crisisactor.
- cited to "Facebook and Google Struggle to Squelch 'Crisis Actor' Posts" a February 23 article in the New York Times by Jack Nicas.
If it doesn't violate BLP to mention the crisis actor accusations based on reliable sources, then it doesn't violate BLP to mention the ridiculous specifics of those accusations and how easily they were debunked. Every single accusation I mentioned on the talk page was an already-debunked one, there was absolutely no harm in reporting that.
Anyone admins who check the history (which now ONLY admins can do, thanks to Acroterion's abuse of his power to censor) will see this. ScratchMarshall (talk) 04:50, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nicolas Cruz
A tag has been placed on Nicolas Cruz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
- disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - MrX 🖋 17:37, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ScratchMarshall promoting conspiracy theories. - MrX 🖋 18:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You are indefinitely topic-banned from editing in the BLP topic area, specifically "any edit in any article with biographical content relating to living or recently deceased people, or any edit relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles of any page in any namespace".
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in this discussion.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please go to WP:TBAN and read the information there to see what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal against the ban, please say so below or on my talk page and I will explain how to do it. NeilN talk to me 19:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)