Kansas Bear (talk | contribs) |
MarshallBagramyan (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
::::I agree that your topic ban precludes you from pursuing this matter on-wiki. I also agree that the evidence which you provide per e-mail is very circumstantial. It is therefore not a sufficient basis for any investigation or enforcement action by me or others. You are of course free to request an investigation as soon as your topic ban expires, but in that case you would need to provide more detailed and convincing evidence, with diffs. By the way, my user name is "Sandstein", not "Sand". <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 18:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
::::I agree that your topic ban precludes you from pursuing this matter on-wiki. I also agree that the evidence which you provide per e-mail is very circumstantial. It is therefore not a sufficient basis for any investigation or enforcement action by me or others. You are of course free to request an investigation as soon as your topic ban expires, but in that case you would need to provide more detailed and convincing evidence, with diffs. By the way, my user name is "Sandstein", not "Sand". <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 18:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
But I thought we were becoming good friends and that I could call you by a nickname or something, kind of like how some people call me "Marsh"....well, anyways, thanks for the advice. And here's notice of my appeal on the ArbCom page, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_MarshallBagramyan]. --[[User:MarshallBagramyan|Marshal Bagramyan]] ([[User talk:MarshallBagramyan|talk]]) 23:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Could you take a look at this editor's reverts? == |
== Could you take a look at this editor's reverts? == |
Revision as of 23:07, 27 August 2010
Welcome to my talk page!
Please place new messages at the bottom of this page, or to start a new discussion, which will automatically be at the bottom. I will respond to comments here, unless you request otherwise. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting:
- Please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. This will create an identifying signature and timestamp.
- Do you have a question about arbitration enforcement? Please read my FAQ at User:Sandstein/AE.
- If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on administrative duty, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: [[example article]].
- If you are looking for my talk page's previous contents, they are in the archives.
Delayed onset muscle soreness
You claim that the source I used in the article Delayed onset muscle soreness is "(unpublished? unreviewed?)". It's doctoral thesis and that thesis lists five papers supporting it. The theory you claim is the "summary of current mainstream research in Nosaka's 2008 textbook" actually references Yu & Thornell in the chapter of DOMS. (Yu, Ji-Guo is the author of the doctoral thesis I used as source) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvasi (talk • contribs) 13:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, I'll respond on the article talk page. Sandstein 14:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Incorrect block
This discussion is over. Sandstein 13:01, 23 August 2010 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hi Sandstein, I am not sure how this official business works exactly, but I would like to say that the user JanDeFietser does not make legal threats. He clearly states: "[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JanDeFietser]he is a "refugee" from the Dutch Wikipedia, where he has been banned in November 2009 for a so called "legal threat" that there wasn't,[/url]". Thereby he refutes all allegations made by this 'NL_Bas' user. In fact, it is this NL-Bas that is transferring problems from the nl-wiki to the en-wiki and should be banned. I do not want to be banned for transferring problems from the nl-wiki to the en-wiki, however, I would like to say that all is definately not as it appears and this NL-Bas has got many personal reasons to want JanDeFietser to go away. So, he is also defending his POV here. Perhaps it is best if I clarify what I am saying. I can be reached at vanslingerlandt@hotmail.com. That way I can give you some facts that should be kept off the en-wiki. Anyway, to get back to the official stuff, I would like to see JanDeFietser unbanned and NL-Bas banned for the above reasons. How do I do that?--85.145.132.170 (talk) 21:11, 22 August 2010 (UTC) Sorry, forgot to log in. --Faust (talk) 21:12, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Tjako, Faust and now also Banqkuo, please stop continuing these Dutch Wikipedia or weblog-related disputes here, or you will also be blocked. That's my last warning. Sandstein 12:43, 23 August 2010 (UTC) I would like to defend myself against Banquo's slander. I am no follower of JDF and I hardly ever go to his weblog, unless I get something pointed out to me. I have come into contact with him after getting a medicine of the same treatment he has been given and have found him to be a kind and patient man, willing to invest time and effort into examining all sorts of topics. The reason I spoke out here is because I think a great injustice is being done. Anyway, I am supposed to drop it, so I will. --Faust (talk) 12:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC) |
Just so that you know: User talk:Shell Kinney#JanDeFietser Uncle G (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Edit warring by previously blocked accounts
Hi Sandstein, I'd like you notify of the behavior of two returning single purpose Falun Gong editors HappyInGeneral (talk · contribs) and Olaf Stephanos (talk · contribs). Both users were previously given 6-month blocks on editing the FLG related articles because of their edit warring behavior [1][2]. Today HappyInGeneral returned to edit the FLG articles, beginning with The Epoch Times, and immediately reverted all of my previous edits [3] with little explaination whatsoever. As soon as I reverted his changes, Olaf also showed up for the first time in four months, tag-teaming with Happy by reverting my changes and accused me of not engaging in discussions [4]. Happy then engaged in a third revert in less than a few minutes [5].PCPP (talk) 17:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hello. Please make any enforcement requests at WP:AE (see the edit notice of this page). Thanks, Sandstein 17:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
There appears to be a problem
Apparently reverting referenced information[6] concerning any article(s) of Turkish origin will result in being labeled a racist(which apparently is allowable on Wikipedia if it is said in a non-English language).[7]
I honestly do not know what User:Finn Diesel problem is, nor do I care. But, as long as some individuals can continue to converse on English wikipedia using a non-English language, they will see themselves as above simple civility. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, not good. Blocked for two weeks. Sandstein 18:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
New section
So, would an appeal for the amelioration or shortening of a topic ban entail me filing an appeal on the Arbitration Enforcement page or placing a certain template on my talk page (which I think is reserved for ban users, no?)?--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 20:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- The directions for an appeal can be found at WP:ARBAA2#Amended Remedies and Enforcement, subsection 2. Sandstein 20:43, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I know you spend enough time as it is on those boards but just I figured I'd give you a heads up about it as well. Best, --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 21:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Can you check your e-mail? Thanks.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 05:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that your topic ban precludes you from pursuing this matter on-wiki. I also agree that the evidence which you provide per e-mail is very circumstantial. It is therefore not a sufficient basis for any investigation or enforcement action by me or others. You are of course free to request an investigation as soon as your topic ban expires, but in that case you would need to provide more detailed and convincing evidence, with diffs. By the way, my user name is "Sandstein", not "Sand". Sandstein 18:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
But I thought we were becoming good friends and that I could call you by a nickname or something, kind of like how some people call me "Marsh"....well, anyways, thanks for the advice. And here's notice of my appeal on the ArbCom page, [8]. --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 23:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Could you take a look at this editor's reverts?
User:Tmhm[9] that has reverted his contentious edit[10][11] on the Armenian Genocide article(a violation of the 1RR covering all AA2). Also, this editor's accusation of anti-Turkish propaganda[12][13] is a violation of civility. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, this concerns a topic area covered by arbitration sanctions. Please make any enforcement requests at WP:AE, and not here, as per the edit notice of this page. Thanks, Sandstein 20:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:28, 27 August 2010 (UTC)