I know. It's called a watchlist. |
New section: You have been added as a party to an arbitration case |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
Thanks. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 02:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 02:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
== You have been added as a party to an arbitration case == |
|||
This message is to notify you that I have added you as a party to an ongoing request for arbitration at [[WP:ARBREQ#BetacommandBot]]. You may wish to comment there. Cheers, ➪[[User_talk:HiDrNick|<span style="color:#CC3300">Hi</span><span style="color:#0088FF"><b>DrNick</b></span>]]! 15:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:54, 8 March 2008
My Contributions
|
ATTENTION! IF YOU ARE REPORTING AN ISSUE WITH ONE OF MY BOTS, AND YOU'D LIKE IT TO BE FIXED BEFORE THE HEAT DEATH OF THE UNIVERSE:
- Visit https://jira.ts.wikimedia.org/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa (you will need to register)
- Select:
- Project: ST47's tools
- Issue Type: Bug, new feature, whatever. If you don't know what this means, choose bug.
- Click next.
- Fill in a short summary, select a priority level, and look to see if the name of the bot is listed in the components section. If it is, select is, otherwise, select unknown.
- Ignore affects version and fix version, I'll fill them in myself
- Ignore assignee
- If this is a problem with the bot that I am running, ignore 'environment'. If you are running my code, put your operating system and other information there.
- Add a detailed description, and
- Hit 'create'.
I'll receive an email immediately, and you will get an email back if I need more information, or once I fix the issue.
If the problem is with the Perlwikipedia code, please put the bug under "Perlwikipedia" project instead. (Bot operators only)
While I will receive a message on my talk page eventually, I have Ways of Knowing when I get new bugs filed through this process.
Please sign your comments. To make a new section, click , or just add a section to the bottom of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ST47. |
![]() |
Contents
Misuse of toolsYou should not use your page protect tool as a weapon against regular users with whom you disagree as you did at the BAG discussion of the proposal for the new bot to tag images. It's completely and wildly inappropriate. Bellwether BC 21:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Suggested rename of User:Non-Free Content Compliance Bot
Would you (all four of you) consider asking for a rename of this bot to User:NFCC Bot (10c)? The reason is that I hope the proposal at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria compliance will gain support, and part of that is a plan to create the following bot accounts to take on the roles of enforcing compliance of those aspects of WP:NFCC that can be checked by bots. User:NFCC Bot (3a), User:NFCC Bot (3b), User:NFCC Bot (7), User:NFCC Bot (9), User:NFCC Bot (10b), User:NFCC Bot (10c). Since the code proposed to run on User:Non-Free Content Compliance Bot is a clone of BetacommandBot's task of enforcing the bot-enforceable part of NFCC#10c, I think the rename I am proposing will help make things clearer. Could you post replies at User talk:Non-Free Content Compliance Bot? Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 01:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC) ANI thread on page protection of bot approval pageI've mentioned you at some point in this, so I'm letting you know about the thread here. Carcharoth (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC) BAG/BRFA issuesPlease read and, if possible, discuss :). Thanks, Martinp23 18:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Template:CVUUsersA tag has been placed on Template:CVUUsers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>). Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC) You have been added as a party to an arbitration caseThis message is to notify you that I have added you as a party to an ongoing request for arbitration at WP:ARBREQ#BetacommandBot. You may wish to comment there. Cheers, ➪HiDrNick! 15:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC) |