MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Russavia/Archive 23. |
honest debate |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
Hi Russavia. I'm not under the impression that I am capable of turning bigots into enlightened people, but I do think I might be able to help prevent non-bigots from being unfairly labeled as bigots. With that in mind, I wanted to make sure you saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_comment%2FF%C3%A6&action=historysubmit&diff=475633833&oldid=475613944 my reply (and offer)] on that other page. --[[User talk:SB_Johnny|<font color="green">'''SB_Johnny'''</font>]] | <sup>[[User_talk:SB_Johnny|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 00:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Russavia. I'm not under the impression that I am capable of turning bigots into enlightened people, but I do think I might be able to help prevent non-bigots from being unfairly labeled as bigots. With that in mind, I wanted to make sure you saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_comment%2FF%C3%A6&action=historysubmit&diff=475633833&oldid=475613944 my reply (and offer)] on that other page. --[[User talk:SB_Johnny|<font color="green">'''SB_Johnny'''</font>]] | <sup>[[User_talk:SB_Johnny|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 00:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC) |
||
==Honest debate== |
|||
Russavia, as the diffs I listed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/F%C3%A6#List_of_editors_who_have_made_personal_attacks_during_this_RfC here], in my opinion, show, I think you have violatd [[WP:NPA]] in your comments related to the Fae RfC. Unsupported allegations of homophobia or harassment are personal attacks. They are also ''[[Ad hominem]]'', which is a [[logical fallacy]]. If you participate in an RfC, please stick to debating the merits of the argument set forth in the "statement of dispute." If you do that, there isn't a problem. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 00:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:10, 9 February 2012
Can you help?!?
I am in constant need of photos for various articles I am working on, and I am in dire need of the following photos from around the globe. So I turn to the community in the hope that someone out there is able to take the photos that I require. If you can help with photos of any of these subjects, please upload them to Commons, and then post a short message with a link to the photos on my English Wikipedia talk page. In the event you don't have a Commons log-in, you can email them to me at russavia.wikipedia@gmail.com and advise which licence you would like to licence them under, and I can do the uploading, categorisation, etc. I have provided as much detail on what I require, including addresses, links to online maps, and photos of the subject that I am unable to upload to Commons, in order for photographers to identify the subject I require. More info at User:Russavia/Required photos |
Welcome to my talk page. Please leave me a , alternatively you are welcome to email me. If you leave a message here for me and it requires a reply, I will reply here, so you may want to add my talk page to your watchlist. All users have my permission to remove any bot messages from my talk page at any time. |
---|
![]() |
---|
8 June 2024 |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Notes
Heritage sub page
We have been watching it quite a task you have set the active wa eds there!! well done! SatuSuro 13:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, there's a heap of articles to be written for sure. The photos I will be knocking off in the coming months.
- Also, I noticed you wrote Maylands Airport - you might want to upload some of the images from here to Commons. Be sure to categorise under Commons:Category:State_Register_of_Heritage_Places as well if you do. Cheers, Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 02:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Re your note. No problems. Moondyne (talk) 04:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your understanding. Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 04:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Apologies for making changes on your workpage, thought I was assisting - as per your note have made some suggestions in respect to links on the talkpage. Keep up the good work - is a good reminder of all the articles that need to be created. Dan arndt (talk) 05:35, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Maybe you'll find interesting...
...this one for your page. Cheers! --Dura-Ace (talk) 14:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 05:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
User:Racepacket
By consensus of the Arbitration Committee, the request for arbitration enforcement in which you participated has been moved here. The hearing will take place at the new location, Roger Davies talk 14:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Roger. I don't have anything more to add, except for the levels of harassment and general hostility towards editors on this project is spiralling out of control (talking about several different issues here), and something needs to be done to put a halt to it for once and for all. In relation to that motion, I'll let my comments stand -- if what is being presented is accurate, a global meta ban is in order, we don't need such editors on this, or any other, project. Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 14:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
tolerance, and intolerance
Hi Russavia. I'm not under the impression that I am capable of turning bigots into enlightened people, but I do think I might be able to help prevent non-bigots from being unfairly labeled as bigots. With that in mind, I wanted to make sure you saw my reply (and offer) on that other page. --SB_Johnny | talk 00:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Honest debate
Russavia, as the diffs I listed here, in my opinion, show, I think you have violatd WP:NPA in your comments related to the Fae RfC. Unsupported allegations of homophobia or harassment are personal attacks. They are also Ad hominem, which is a logical fallacy. If you participate in an RfC, please stick to debating the merits of the argument set forth in the "statement of dispute." If you do that, there isn't a problem. Cla68 (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)