whitespace |
minor fix |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
Hi. You're a supporter of userboxes, and there's currently a policy poll going on about userboxes that might solve the speedy deletion issue. I encourage you to vote if you haven't already. Thank you. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 21:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC) |
Hi. You're a supporter of userboxes, and there's currently a policy poll going on about userboxes that might solve the speedy deletion issue. I encourage you to vote if you haven't already. Thank you. [[User:Dtm142|Dtm142]] 21:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
:I am certainly not a supporter of userboxes, and I've already voted anyway. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 21:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC) |
:I am certainly not a supporter of userboxes, and I've already voted anyway. --[[User:Rory096|Rory096]] 21:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Brendenhull's RFA== |
|||
Hi Rory096. I was wondering if you could maybe reword your 3rd optional question to Brendenhull on his RFA? You linked his move log and asked him to explain every move he made. Instead of making come up with a 5-paragraph essay answer to his moves, could you possibly give a more specific question for a move? (such as "can you explain you're move for title X to title Y") It would seem a little bit more fair if you could do this for him. Thanks! [[User:DGX|<font color="00FF00">D</font><font color="000000" >G</font>]][[User talk:DGX|<font color="00FF00">X</font>]] 06:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:37, 27 May 2006
Number of times this page has been vandalized: 0
Archive (January 29, 2006 to March 16, 2006)
Archive2 (March 16, 2006 to March 26, 2006)
Archive3 (March 26, 2006 to April 5, 2006)
Archive4 (April 5, 2006 to April 21, 2006)
Archive5 (April 21, 2006 to May 3, 2006)
Archive6 (May 4, 2006 to May 21, 2006)
AFD on Www.hayaser.net
Hello, you may be interested in an AFD on a page you prodded. The AFD proposal can be seen at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Www.hayaser.net. Copysan 10:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 22nd.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 21 | 22 May 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Merci beaucoup!
![]() |
Thank you, Rory096/Archive9! Thank you for voting for my recent RfA, which passed (to my extreme surprise and shock) with a total tally of 66/15/2. For that, I would like to thank you and offer a helping hand in any admin-related tasks that may be required -- it's as simple as leaving a message on my talkpage. Thanks again! -→Buchanan-Hermit™/!? 22:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC) |
Hello Rory! Thank you very much for supporting my request for adminship (with your own trademark, at that!). Hopefully I'll never have to push the red button on your user page. :o) Thanks again, and if you ever see something that I could be doing better, feel free to leave me a message. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 01:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Counter-Strike Maps
Might I ask why you added the merge tag to all of the Counter-Strike map articles "per afd?" If the results are counted, there are 23 keep votes to 17 merge. It had also been established quite well that Counter-Strike maps was already too long of an article. --Varco 06:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Did you read Aaron Brenneman's closing statement? There's clearly consensus to at least merge the articles. Also, it's not a vote. --Rory096 06:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- I know it's not a vote, I was just pointing out that there were more people who wanted to keep it. The Counter-Strike maps article is very long, I think that alternative solutions should be explored. I will express these concerns in the merge discussion
(which should probably also be confined to one page, in my opinion). --Varco 06:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)- Sorry, I didn't see that they all had one discussion page. --Varco 06:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- I know it's not a vote, I was just pointing out that there were more people who wanted to keep it. The Counter-Strike maps article is very long, I think that alternative solutions should be explored. I will express these concerns in the merge discussion
- Hello. *note regular editor hat being worn* I'm here to attempt to pre-empt what I think could be an acrimonious series of exchanges. I'm going to leave an almost identical message on Varco's talk as well.
- A lot of work has been put into this series of articles. Despite the concerns I raised in the close, a lot of it is good work. We can acknowledge that while still disagreeing over other issues.
- There are some structural challenges to the proposed merge. A ruthless application of the reliable source guideline will make some of that go away, but not all.
- Whatever we say, strength of numbers does count for something, and experiance shows that video games are one area where it often counts a lot. This must be taken into consideration.
- We all want the same thing: The best encyclopedia we can produce. So let's focus first on the thigs we agree on, and work from there. Happy, harmonius editing will surely follow!
- brenneman {L} 06:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hello. *note regular editor hat being worn* I'm here to attempt to pre-empt what I think could be an acrimonious series of exchanges. I'm going to leave an almost identical message on Varco's talk as well.
Thanks!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Original_Barnstar.png)
Thanks for tagging the nearly 100 talk pages created by 68.65.43.49. I had gone through nearly 50 of them before I realized that there was a pattern there, and blocked him. Have a barnstar for your efforts.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 07:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- And now for creating User:Rory096/orphanedtalks. However, please check out the articles. Most of them are to-dos or temp pages or archives etc. So please trim them from the list. I will try to get through the first one tomorrow.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 15:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
CorbinSimpson's Request for Adminship
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Symbol_oppose_vote.png/75px-Symbol_oppose_vote.png)
Shutoff button
I have been trying to fix this, but I haven't been able to figure it out...The shutoff button seems to be larger than the page itself...for example, some of the buttons at the top can't be clicked - instead the button is pressed. Maybe something to fix or to leave as is? :-) --HappyCamper 03:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Right, I noticed that a while ago. Apparently it's because the button is a text character (•), so it is just in the center of a large line that happens to include some of the top buttons. It would probably be better as an image (with template:click), but that would use up more bandwidth for no good reason, and I'm too lazy to make the image anyway. --Rory096 03:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Is that what that is? Hm, you learn something new everyday. --HappyCamper 03:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
AGF redirect
Hey, I figured since I'm the one who got rid of the assume good faith cross-namespace redirect I could at least help you resolve all of the old redirects. --Cyde↔Weys 17:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- You're not actually the one who did it (this time). Somebody restored it, and it just got re-redirected on RfD. I've got it covered though; I'm nearly done. --Rory096 17:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Are you doing this stuff manually? If you are, you might just want to save some time and let Cydebot finish it up on automatic. No reason to spend a few hours pressing that "Save" button over and over. --Cyde↔Weys 17:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi. You're a supporter of userboxes, and there's currently a policy poll going on about userboxes that might solve the speedy deletion issue. I encourage you to vote if you haven't already. Thank you. Dtm142 21:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- I am certainly not a supporter of userboxes, and I've already voted anyway. --Rory096 21:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Brendenhull's RFA
Hi Rory096. I was wondering if you could maybe reword your 3rd optional question to Brendenhull on his RFA? You linked his move log and asked him to explain every move he made. Instead of making come up with a 5-paragraph essay answer to his moves, could you possibly give a more specific question for a move? (such as "can you explain you're move for title X to title Y") It would seem a little bit more fair if you could do this for him. Thanks! DGX 06:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)