Robertinventor (talk | contribs) m →Your recent edit: formatting |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Topic ban from the Four Noble Truths: new section |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
::: Thanks, and thanks for noticing it and helping me by explaining wikipedia policy that I didn't know, and keeping me out of trouble.[[User:Robertinventor|Robert Walker]] ([[User talk:Robertinventor#top|talk]]) 10:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC) |
::: Thanks, and thanks for noticing it and helping me by explaining wikipedia policy that I didn't know, and keeping me out of trouble.[[User:Robertinventor|Robert Walker]] ([[User talk:Robertinventor#top|talk]]) 10:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Topic ban from the [[Four Noble Truths]] == |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg |
|||
|imagesize=50px |
|||
|1=The following sanction has been imposed on you: |
|||
{{Talkquote|1=You are banned for six months from the topic of the Four Noble Truths on all pages of Wikipedia including talk}} |
|||
You have been sanctioned per a discussion at [[WP:AN]] |
|||
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] as authorised by the community's decision at [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=722347413&oldid=722346854]], and the procedure described by the [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions guidelines]]. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. |
|||
You may appeal this sanction at the [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:Community sanction.--> [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
When notifying you before, I didn't include the official template. Here it is now for completeness, and so that other admins are aware. The ban expires on 27 November, 2016. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:50, 8 June 2016
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Present day habitability of Mars, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Present day habitability of Mars has a new comment
AN-notice: topic-ban proposal for Four Noble Truths
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Sorry to inform you, but I've proposed a topic-ban for you on Four Noble Truths. See Administrators Noticeboard#Topic ban requested. I'm sure your intentions are good, but the way you are trying to implement your ideas is unworkable. All the best, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- The discussion has been closed and a community ban has been enacted. You are banned for six months from making any edits about the Four Noble Truths on all pages of Wikipedia, including talk and noticeboards. The ban expires on 27 November 2016. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- EdJohnston, does the restriction apply to the editor or just this user ID? I ask because Robert has created an alternate account, Robert C. Walker, and I expect but am not certain that the restriction applies to that account also. Thanks. Ca2james (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- The topic ban applies to the person, no matter which account he uses to log in to Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 22:57, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you look at the user page of my alternative account, you'll see that I say
"So I logged out of wikipedia for a week, just to forget about it. Logging back in, I find that the ANI is still in progress, logged out again and I've created this account just so I can do editing in other areas of wikipedia as a non anonymous editor until the ANI is over. I will not use this account to edit the Buddhism topic area talk pages while the ANI is in progress and will not use it to comment on the ANI. I expect to use this account mainly for editing articles in the topic areas of astronomy, physics,space science, and perhaps other areas like music and maths."
- Robert Walker (talk) 23:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- The topic ban applies to the person, no matter which account he uses to log in to Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 22:57, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- EdJohnston, does the restriction apply to the editor or just this user ID? I ask because Robert has created an alternate account, Robert C. Walker, and I expect but am not certain that the restriction applies to that account also. Thanks. Ca2james (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Your recent edit
This edit is skirting the boundaries of, if not actually violating, your topic ban. You're not allowed to discuss the topic from which you are banned - or edits to the topic, or the behaviour of editors on that topic - anywhere on Wikipedia, even if you don't mention the topic by name. The point of a topic ban is to get you out of the problematic topic area and editing productively elsewhere. Attempting to "set the record straight" on another editor's changes in the problematic area is not getting out of that topic area. The fact is that while you are under a topic ban, you cannot set the record straight; you must let the topic go completely on Wikipedia. I strongly advise you to revert that edit and to not make any further similar ones. If you reply to this note, do not bring up specific edits or attempt to justify why you left that message. Any further mention of or alluding to the topic from which you are banned could result in you being taken back to ANI for violating your topic ban. Thanks. Ca2james (talk) 23:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Okay thanks, reverted. I didn't know this. Robert Walker (talk) 02:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, and thanks for noticing it and helping me by explaining wikipedia policy that I didn't know, and keeping me out of trouble.Robert Walker (talk) 10:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Topic ban from the Four Noble Truths
The following sanction has been imposed on you:
You are banned for six months from the topic of the Four Noble Truths on all pages of Wikipedia including talk
You have been sanctioned per a discussion at WP:AN
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by the community's decision at [[1]], and the procedure described by the general sanctions guidelines. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. EdJohnston (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
When notifying you before, I didn't include the official template. Here it is now for completeness, and so that other admins are aware. The ban expires on 27 November, 2016. EdJohnston (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)