MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 4d) to User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 4. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
::: Might wanna check [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASandbox&diff=183800248&oldid=183799424 this] out. Could he have sockpuppets? --[[User:HPJoker|<font color="red">HP</font><font color="tan">Jo</font><font color="blue">ker</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:HPJoker|Leave me a message]]</sup>''' 07:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
::: Might wanna check [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASandbox&diff=183800248&oldid=183799424 this] out. Could he have sockpuppets? --[[User:HPJoker|<font color="red">HP</font><font color="tan">Jo</font><font color="blue">ker</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:HPJoker|Leave me a message]]</sup>''' 07:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::: I know. I'm just bored. --[[User:HPJoker|<font color="red">HP</font><font color="tan">Jo</font><font color="blue">ker</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:HPJoker|Leave me a message]]</sup>''' 17:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:22, 12 January 2008
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Airborne Science Program
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Airy-0
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Alan Boss
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Alan G. Poindexter
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Alan M. Lovelace
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Alan Shepard
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Alan Stern
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Alba Mons
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Albedo features on Mars
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Albert H. Crews
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Albert Sacco
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Albor Tholus
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Aleksandr Kaleri
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Aleksandr Skvortsov (cosmonaut)
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Alfred J. Eggers
User:Ohms Law Bot/Cleanup/Alfred Worden
I will reply to messages left here on your talk page.
Archive 4 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Utter insolence
Can you believe how ludicrously USELESS the admins are on this site? Honestly! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devendorane (talk • contribs) 12:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- :O Never! – Gurch 20:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
DAMMIT!
I hate Hasek so bad... 1-0 is a crap score! :( Jmlk17 04:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Reply to Abuse Report
I am sorry, I must have missed that requirement. I apologize for the inconvenience. The problem is that the user switch IP over and over, which would make it nearly impossible to post enough warnings to get even one of the addresses blocked. But thanks anyway, I will try my best! Do you have any suggestions on how to go about this? It is clearly the same user as I have seen the same changes being made from different addresses. --τις (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help. I have to apologize again, because I thought my abuse report could result in a range block. I guess I will have to read ahead a bit before starting to file reports. :) I just got so frustrated when the pages were vandalized much faster than I could revert them, especially when taking all the IP addresses into account. However, as the vandalism is not active at the moment, I now had the time to add warnings on nine of the user pages. Hopefully, this will speed up the blocking process the next time. Thanks again! --τις (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Your username
Heh, well I never really liked Osgood. He only showed up this year but Hasek has gotten better and better.. two straight shutouts. He was also third in the Western Conference (NHL) voting. Besides, he's almost 43 and can play at a top level. Don't expect Luongo calibre, he's out of his prime. Hasek was always a good goalie since 1994. ;) --Hasek is the best (talk) 23:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Probably, depending on the year he has. I've only liked Hasek since 2005...oh well. I hope he gets to the HHOF.--Hasek is the best (talk) 00:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I just got it granted to me as well, no longer will administrators be beating us to reverts! :) Tiptoety talk 01:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I already have TW and I have no complaints about that. I just want to see what the new one is like. If it isn't special I may just ask them to take it back. lol. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yea, i use Twinkle as well, and over all i really like it, the downside to this program is it does not redirect you to the vandalizers talk page, and does not auto insert the name of the article they vandalized, it must all be done by hand. Though it is much faster. Tiptoety talk 01:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yea, i saw that. I was just about to say something, but hey yea at least you tried! :) Tiptoety talk 01:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yea, i use Twinkle as well, and over all i really like it, the downside to this program is it does not redirect you to the vandalizers talk page, and does not auto insert the name of the article they vandalized, it must all be done by hand. Though it is much faster. Tiptoety talk 01:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I could not help myself! :) I almost feel like putting it up on the talk page, but know all that would do would create anoher discussion about me violating some policy, hopefully it will all be over soon. Tiptoety talk 07:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it!
Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Marlith T/C 05:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Marlith T/C 05:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
For you
Here's a pretty picture for you. No cats though .... ;) Pedro : Chat 16:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Rollbackimgedit.jpg)
- Yeah, it's tricky getting it right! Any how I'm leaving everyone else to beat each other up on the discussion and I'm going to do something more useful now. Sorry about plonking it on your user sub page before I realise people were transcluding it BTW. Eeek! Best Wishes. Pedro : Chat 16:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Wannabe Kate
It's extremely slow when you get into tens of thousands of edits, and was only implemented to combat the (now mostly non-existemt) replication lag. Will (talk) 18:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Sockpuppet
Probably a sockpuppeteer, using Special:Contributions/Meryl_Starfire. Deleted contribs overlap with RP's. But I could be wrong. J-ſtanContribsUser page 23:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/R. fiend/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/R. fiend/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 23:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Block of User:Slick legend
Thank you for reporting my mistake, I've fixed the message, as the intended block was of eight hours. Best regards, Snowolf How can I help? 00:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Deleted all as per G3/G1. Thanks for reporting ;-) Snowolf How can I help? 01:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm so so SO SO SO SO SORRY!
It's late at night and I'm ADHD. Those don't mix. I try and find humor and found it absurd how he didn't get the message. I'm so sorry. I never have read the rules that regard stuff like calling someone a dumbass. Sorry.
PS. You say that you screw vandals so can you block that guy? --HPJoker Leave me a message 05:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- By the way, I put our discussion in my archives, if that is okay. It is in Everything Else. --HPJoker Leave me a message 06:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- It does. --HPJoker Leave me a message 07:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Might wanna check this out. Could he have sockpuppets? --HPJoker Leave me a message 07:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- I know. I'm just bored. --HPJoker Leave me a message 17:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)