HidariMigi (talk | contribs) →Miszabot archiver on Talk:Juliet_Landau: new section |
71.234.215.133 (talk) →Juliet Landau's DOB: new section |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Hi, I've reverted your addition of the Miszabot archiver to the [[Juliet Landau]] talk page. For one, it's not really useful to archive a short discussion page-- even if the topics are old; but also, it contains pertinent discussion on the verifiability of her birth date, that are periodically questioned. Additionally, it appears the bot may be incorrectly set, or somehow broken, as it archived everything except one section from 2009, and failed to create a topic index-- so there was no way for a reader to reach the archived materials [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Juliet_Landau&diff=458946969&oldid=458743418]. In short, it isn't a necessity to archive this page (yet) --[[User:HidariMigi|HidariMigi]] ([[User talk:HidariMigi|talk]]) 02:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hi, I've reverted your addition of the Miszabot archiver to the [[Juliet Landau]] talk page. For one, it's not really useful to archive a short discussion page-- even if the topics are old; but also, it contains pertinent discussion on the verifiability of her birth date, that are periodically questioned. Additionally, it appears the bot may be incorrectly set, or somehow broken, as it archived everything except one section from 2009, and failed to create a topic index-- so there was no way for a reader to reach the archived materials [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Juliet_Landau&diff=458946969&oldid=458743418]. In short, it isn't a necessity to archive this page (yet) --[[User:HidariMigi|HidariMigi]] ([[User talk:HidariMigi|talk]]) 02:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
== [[Juliet Landau]]'s DOB == |
|||
A consensus about publishing [[Juliet Landau]]'s date of birth was reached on the article's [[Talk:Juliet Landau|talk page]]. Please discuss the information there before adding it again to the article. While secondary sources can be cited, complaint via OTRS and the subject's own claims make publishing any date sensitive. [[Special:Contributions/71.234.215.133|71.234.215.133]] ([[User talk:71.234.215.133|talk]]) 04:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:48, 6 November 2011
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
thanks
Thanks for the cleanup with extra care on the pony articles. One comment is that if you switch stuff from US to UK English, maybe get a Brit to proofread to be sure you got it all. ThatPeskyCommoner is a good one to ask, she's fond of proofreading and knows horses. Montanabw(talk) 21:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Miszabot archiver on Talk:Juliet_Landau
Hi, I've reverted your addition of the Miszabot archiver to the Juliet Landau talk page. For one, it's not really useful to archive a short discussion page-- even if the topics are old; but also, it contains pertinent discussion on the verifiability of her birth date, that are periodically questioned. Additionally, it appears the bot may be incorrectly set, or somehow broken, as it archived everything except one section from 2009, and failed to create a topic index-- so there was no way for a reader to reach the archived materials [1]. In short, it isn't a necessity to archive this page (yet) --HidariMigi (talk) 02:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Juliet Landau's DOB
A consensus about publishing Juliet Landau's date of birth was reached on the article's talk page. Please discuss the information there before adding it again to the article. While secondary sources can be cited, complaint via OTRS and the subject's own claims make publishing any date sensitive. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 04:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)