Posting {{nn-warn-deletion}} using NPWatcher. |
Response to your question at my talk page. |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]], and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-deletion --> <font face="Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<font color="blue"><strong>Kinu</strong></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<font color="red">''t''</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<font color="red">''c''</font>]]</sub></font> 15:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC) |
Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]], and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-deletion --> <font face="Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<font color="blue"><strong>Kinu</strong></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<font color="red">''t''</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<font color="red">''c''</font>]]</sub></font> 15:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
*I went to the website in question and it said I was the 723rd visitor. This, given with the lack of information in the article, leads me to believe that the site does not meet notability criteria outlined at [[WP:WEB]]. The lack of any assertion of notability made the article worthy of speedy deletion. If you can provide any information whatsoever indicating that the site is notable, then you are free to recreate the article. Otherwise it will likely be deleted again, possibly speedily. FYI: the comparison to Bebo is not a good argument, by the way, as Bebo is one of the top 100 most popular sites on the web, per [http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=www.bebo.com Alexa].--<font face="Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<font color="blue"><strong>Kinu</strong></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<font color="red">''t''</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<font color="red">''c''</font>]]</sub></font> 15:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:23, 20 April 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page The Sarah Jane Adventures do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Yamla 20:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
The article Tommies (Website) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kinu t/c 15:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- I went to the website in question and it said I was the 723rd visitor. This, given with the lack of information in the article, leads me to believe that the site does not meet notability criteria outlined at WP:WEB. The lack of any assertion of notability made the article worthy of speedy deletion. If you can provide any information whatsoever indicating that the site is notable, then you are free to recreate the article. Otherwise it will likely be deleted again, possibly speedily. FYI: the comparison to Bebo is not a good argument, by the way, as Bebo is one of the top 100 most popular sites on the web, per Alexa.--Kinu t/c 15:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)