Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Prashant!/Archive 7) (bot |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
Keep up the good work! <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/196.41.41.82|196.41.41.82]] ([[User talk:196.41.41.82|talk]]) 07:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Keep up the good work! <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/196.41.41.82|196.41.41.82]] ([[User talk:196.41.41.82|talk]]) 07:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Help == |
|||
{{tmbox |
|||
| type = style |
|||
| image = [[File:Pictogram voting comment.svg|40px]] |
|||
| text = |
|||
<span style="font-size:120%;">'''Please use the {{Tlx|Help me}} template appropriately.'''</span><br />The {{Tlx|Help me}} template is for help using Wikipedia. If you would like to ask a question about using Wikipedia, please replace the code '''{{tlp|Help me-inappropriate}}''' on this page with '''{{Tlx|Help me}}'''. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the [[WP:THQ|Teahouse]], the [[WP:HD|help desk]], or join the {{freenode|wikipedia-en-help}} [[Wikipedia:IRC channels|IRC help channel]] to get real-time assistance.}} |
|||
:I would like to request the checkuser to check ASAP as I have my exams. My flc is pending and this user Krimuk90, who is a drama creator, having a gala time framing me with no proof. Please, check fast. Here, some cowards talk through e-mail and plan to get down others. I want to ask if you are very positive and honest why don't you say directly. Hypocrisy! These kind of users should be ashamed of themselves and their face should be blackened to show how much they are........—[[User talk:Prashant!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Red">'''Prashant'''</span>]] 10:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Prashant, this is not the right way to use a {{t|helpme}} tag. There are only so many hours in the day, and Wikipedia admins are all volunteers, so the SPI will be looked at in due time. Forcing the issue will do you no favours. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 10:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
What about framing an innocent user for personal reasons? This user is an expert in this. I have my flc going on and my exams are also coming near. And, you are saying this.—[[User talk:Prashant!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Red">'''Prashant'''</span>]] 10:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:28, 10 April 2015
Archives
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Would you like to conduct a GAR on this article? Let me know if you are interested in doing so or not. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
I posted that message almost ten days back and no reply till now and you've been active since these ten days. Hence i assume that you are not at all interested to take up a GAR of this article. Sorry for troubling you. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
@Pavanjandhyala: Sorry buddy, I didn't saw your message. I don't check my talk page message and since, the last few days, there were several notifications which includes my article (created) was linked with this that and blah blah and other thanking me. So, I didn't observed your message in between. Okay, Let me check the article.—Prashant 15:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I cannot review as I am not familiar with the topics and don't have much time (as of April-May 11) due to my forthcoming exams which includes my 4th semester and few regular tests, and I have to comple my lab assignments and then, Viva. If you can wait till May, then I would review in a day. Also, I'm only focusing on the FLC and my other articles are on hold. I hope you can understand. All the best!—Prashant 16:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I understand, and also would like to add that mine too is more or less the same situation. Thus leave this one. When i expand and get c/ed my favorite film-related article to get reviewed for GA status, i shall approach you sometime in mid May 2015, and i hope you will review this one for sure. Good luck for your ongoing endeavours! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah for sure. I will review your article whenever you say. Just notify me. Thanks! Would you like to give my input to my flc? I will appreciate it. Thanks!—Prashant 16:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Looks good. Though i secured nine GA successes in a row, i am not worthy of giving inputs in this case and may mess up things there. Anyways, thanks for asking and hope your flc wins. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Enthiran PR
Do let me know if you are interested in commenting at the PR. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
I've opened a PR for an article, and need some suggestions. So if you've time then please leave your comments here. :) Hetika (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Priyanka Chopra filmography
Hi. Hope you're well. I noticed you changed my edit on this article. I thought I should try to fully explain the edit as I can see how it could be seen as major.
- 1) Details about the film itself are best suited for the film's article and not Chopra's bio so Fashion being "women-centric" is not relevant.
- 2) For her role in Barfi, we can't use single reviews as it becomes a POV issue especially if the claim that it was one of the finest, on the same token someone could add a negative review of her performance and claim that describes how her performance was viewed widely which you would agree would be wrong. If you can find a source where many critics thought it was one of the finest performances in Indian cinema then there is justification for it to be present.
- 3) We can use awards/ nominations as a way of expressing that the performance was appreciated instead of reviews.
- 4) Mentioning that Barfi was sent to the Oscars is also not needed as she's not a producer of the film.
- 5) Krrish being a major box office phenomenon needs a ref.
- 6) The unsourced claim of Mary Kom being a critical success is not relevant, should only focus on how her performance was perceived.
- 7) I had changed the main picture to one that is film related from the same time period as it is an article about her films not her promotions.
- 8) Others were just copyedits.
Cowlibob (talk) 15:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, the review for Barfi! was added during its flc on reviewers request. I can understand but, I think it should be left the way it passed FL. Though, I must say your edits were impressive. But, I will still prefer the earlier one. In between, would you show up on the flc, which you left?—Prashant 15:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
PC's awards list
Hi Prashant.
Love your work on Wiki. Just saw you removed PC's Bollywood Hungama awards table from her page. I understand u did that because of the fl nomination but why don't you add those awards in the other awards table. The same has been done in Vidya Balan's awards page. They didnt remove the Bollywood hungama awards, just added them in the other awards category. Is that possible?
Keep up the good work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.41.41.82 (talk) 07:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Help
- I would like to request the checkuser to check ASAP as I have my exams. My flc is pending and this user Krimuk90, who is a drama creator, having a gala time framing me with no proof. Please, check fast. Here, some cowards talk through e-mail and plan to get down others. I want to ask if you are very positive and honest why don't you say directly. Hypocrisy! These kind of users should be ashamed of themselves and their face should be blackened to show how much they are........—Prashant 10:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
What about framing an innocent user for personal reasons? This user is an expert in this. I have my flc going on and my exams are also coming near. And, you are saying this.—Prashant 10:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)