Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk | contribs) |
→Could you please explain more fully?: new section |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Actually it was putting the nonsense tag in that vandal article.Feel We should encourge all users in aprticular IP editors to stay.[[User:Pharaoh of the Wizards|Pharaoh of the Wizards]] ([[User talk:Pharaoh of the Wizards#top|talk]]) 10:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC) |
Actually it was putting the nonsense tag in that vandal article.Feel We should encourge all users in aprticular IP editors to stay.[[User:Pharaoh of the Wizards|Pharaoh of the Wizards]] ([[User talk:Pharaoh of the Wizards#top|talk]]) 10:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Could you please explain more fully? == |
|||
Greetings, |
|||
I try my best to understand the points of those who disagree with me. Even if I broadly disagree with them, there may be some points they hold that I would agree with. I try to identify those, so I can take them into account in my future contributions. And, who knows, if I fully understand their points, I may be won over. |
|||
You wrote: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FAhmed_Adnan_Muhammad_Ajam&diff=201774620&oldid=201768902 We cannot be having articles for everyone detained]. |
|||
*No one is suggesting we have an article about everyone who has been detained. |
|||
*No one is suggesting we have an article about every Guantanamo captive. |
|||
Several participants in the discussion stated that Guantanamo captives were just like convicted felons. I have addressed this concern many times. |
|||
If this is your root concern, I would really appreciate it if you would take the time to review: [[User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Guantanamo captives aren't felons and aren't POWs|Guantanamo captives aren't felons and aren't POWs]]. |
|||
Several participants in the discussion stated that the article does not fulfill [[WP:BIO]]. I thought I had addressed those concerns. I would really appreciate it if you could find your way clear to explain more fully which clause(s) of [[WP:BIO]] you think the article does not fulfill. |
|||
Thanks! [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 15:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:11, 29 March 2008
Talk Archive |
---|
RE:
I haven't do anything yet ! Just viewing although I've already have an account. Regards, --125.25.19.186 (talk) 10:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Actually it was putting the nonsense tag in that vandal article.Feel We should encourge all users in aprticular IP editors to stay.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Could you please explain more fully?
Greetings,
I try my best to understand the points of those who disagree with me. Even if I broadly disagree with them, there may be some points they hold that I would agree with. I try to identify those, so I can take them into account in my future contributions. And, who knows, if I fully understand their points, I may be won over.
You wrote: We cannot be having articles for everyone detained.
- No one is suggesting we have an article about everyone who has been detained.
- No one is suggesting we have an article about every Guantanamo captive.
Several participants in the discussion stated that Guantanamo captives were just like convicted felons. I have addressed this concern many times. If this is your root concern, I would really appreciate it if you would take the time to review: Guantanamo captives aren't felons and aren't POWs.
Several participants in the discussion stated that the article does not fulfill WP:BIO. I thought I had addressed those concerns. I would really appreciate it if you could find your way clear to explain more fully which clause(s) of WP:BIO you think the article does not fulfill.