→Commons: removed |
→response to warning: re likely SPA |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
PBS, I've responded to your "tagging redirects as orphans" message on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lockley my own talk page], FYI. Cheers. --[[User:Lockley|Lockley]] ([[User talk:Lockley|talk]]) 18:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC) |
PBS, I've responded to your "tagging redirects as orphans" message on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lockley my own talk page], FYI. Cheers. --[[User:Lockley|Lockley]] ([[User talk:Lockley|talk]]) 18:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
:PBS, you probably should take a look at this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EEng&diff=534705699&oldid=534687217]. I hope I'm wrong, but it looks like someone's up to no good. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 20:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:13, 24 January 2013
|
|
You have a message
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Maxwell Wallace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prince Leopold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Battle of Berlin
My intend was simply to use the correct dash. I have no strong opinion regarding the name of the article. MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, understood MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom request
Hello PBS, Happy New Year. I've mentioned you in an ArbCom case request submission. While you are not a party, your comments would be appreciated. LittleBen (talk) 12:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Your comment
See my reply Phillip. I am suspicious of your sudden interest in this dispute. You must realise it will have no bearing on the outcome of the consus of the title change. I am entitled to state my opinion on your attiutde on this article if I choose to do so. I have not received an adequate response to your resistance to the the operational commanders being added, other than, I presume, it was me that added it. I have only edited this article several times over the past few years, but you - and you alone - have contested every single change to the content. Why? It is quite acceptable to complain that these unreasonable complaints slow down its progression. Editors like me like to get on with things. Under the circumstances I'm justified in saying what I said - which is an observation, not an attack. Dapi89 (talk) 10:25, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saint Kenelm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alderley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Clan Gregor mercat cross image
I see you restored the original pic of the mercat cross on this page after I'd replaced it with a pic of the post-1617 location. Thanks for spotting that error. Kim Traynor (talk) 15:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
response to warning
PBS, I've responded to your "tagging redirects as orphans" message on my own talk page, FYI. Cheers. --Lockley (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC)