==Jonathan's Law== |
m rm vandalism |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
==Request for peer review== |
==Request for peer review== |
||
The article '''[[Clinical psychology]]''' has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology/Peer review/Clinical psychology|peer review page]]''' and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! [[User:Psykhosis|Psykhosis]] 20:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC) |
The article '''[[Clinical psychology]]''' has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology/Peer review/Clinical psychology|peer review page]]''' and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! [[User:Psykhosis|Psykhosis]] 20:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
== NHS == |
|||
At http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Refrigerator_mother&diff=prev&oldid=91074757 and various other places you present the NHS - the health service of four nations - with the implication that anything coming from it is suspect. This is unjustified - at least by you. Justify it or cease presenting this point of view in WP. [[User:Midgley|Midgley]] 00:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Repeated untrue statement about me == |
|||
"the npov vaccination critics page, which morphed into the pov ridden anti-vaccinationists" |
|||
You have previously been made aware that John's vaccine critics page was deleted in an afd. [[Anti-vaccinationist]] was started de novo, later. There is no connection between them. You appear to be accusing (everyone of everything) me of some sort of plagiarism, expropriation or whatever, and you have no reasonable excuse for not knowing this to be false. Please apply a retraction to the AFD in which you made that comment. [[User:Midgley|Midgley]] 01:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Courtesy notice == |
|||
As you are on probation for tendentious editing on medically related articles and I believe your behavior at the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frequency of autism|frequency of autism AfD]] violates the terms of this probation, I have asked for a review [[WP:AE|here]]. [[User:MastCell|MastCell]] 01:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Jonathan's Law]]== |
==[[Jonathan's Law]]== |
||
Please note that the initial article has been deleted per [[WP:BLP]], as there was a clear statement that death had been caused by negligence or worse and this was not referenced. Please do not reinstate it unless it has cast iron references. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
Please note that the initial article has been deleted per [[WP:BLP]], as there was a clear statement that death had been caused by negligence or worse and this was not referenced. Please do not reinstate it unless it has cast iron references. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
<!-- Template from Template:Refstart --> |
|||
== Guide to referencing == |
|||
Click on "show" to open contents. |
|||
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: center; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em; font-size: 100%; " |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="background-color: #f90;" | <big>Using references (citations)</big> |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" style="text-align: left;" | |
|||
I thought you might find it useful to have some information about references (refs) on wikipedia. These are important to [[WP:V|validate]] your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can removed unreferenced material; and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's highly advisable to also include a reference to say where it came from. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started. |
|||
=== Good references === |
|||
A reference must be accurate, i.e. it must prove the statement in the text. To validate "Mike Brown climbed Everest", it's no good linking to a page about Everest, if Mike Brown isn't mentioned, nor to one on Mike Brown, if it doesn't say that he climbed Everest. You have to link to a source that proves his achievement is true. You must use [[WP:Reliable sources|Reliable sources]], such as published books, mainstream press, authorised web sites, and official documents. Blogs, Myspace, Youtube, fan sites and extreme minority texts are not usually acceptable, nor is [[WP:Original research|Original research]], e.g. your own unpublished, or self-published, essay or research. |
|||
=== Simple referencing === |
|||
The first thing you have to do is to create a "Notes and references" section. This goes towards the bottom of the page, below the "See also" section and above the "External links" section. Enter this code: |
|||
:<nowiki>==Notes and references==</nowiki> |
|||
:<nowiki><references/></nowiki> |
|||
The next step is to put a reference in the text. Here is the code to do that. It goes at the end of the relevant term, phrase, sentence, or paragraph to which the note refers, and ''after'' punctuation such as a full stop, without a space (to prevent separation through line wrap): |
|||
:<nowiki><ref> </ref></nowiki> |
|||
Whatever text you put in between these two tags will become visible in the "Notes and references" section as your reference. |
|||
=== Test it out === |
|||
Copy the following text, open the edit box for this page, paste it at the bottom (inserting your own text) and save the page: |
|||
:<nowiki>==Reference test==</nowiki> |
|||
:This is the text which you are going to reference.<nowiki><ref></nowiki> ''Substitute your own text in this space'' <nowiki></ref></nowiki> |
|||
:<nowiki>==Notes and references==</nowiki> |
|||
:<nowiki><references/></nowiki> |
|||
(End of text to copy and paste.) |
|||
=== Information to include === |
|||
You need to include the information to enable the reader to find your source. For a book it might look like this: |
|||
:<nowiki><ref> Smith, Timothy: "A Guide to Planets", page 29. Solar Publishing, 2001 </ref></nowiki> |
|||
An online newspaper source would be: |
|||
:<nowiki><ref> Plunkett, John. [http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1601858,00.html "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying"], ''[[The Guardian]]'', [[2005-10-27]]. Retrieved on [[2005-10-27]]. </ref></nowiki> |
|||
Note the square brackets around the URL. The format is <nowiki>[URL Title]</nowiki> with a space between the URL and the Title. If you do this the URL is hidden and the Title shows as the link. Use double apostrophes for the article title, and two single quote marks either side of the name of the paper (to generate italics). |
|||
The date after ''The Guardian'' is the date of the newspaper, and the date after "Retrieved on" is the date you accessed the site – useful for searching the [http://www.archive.org web archive] in case the link goes dead. Wikilinks (double square brackets which create an internal link to a wikipedia article) function inside the ref tags. Dates are wikilinked so that they work with user [[Help:Preferences|preference settings]]. |
|||
=== Citation templates === |
|||
You may prefer to use a citation template to compile details of the source. The template goes between the ref tags and you fill out the fields you wish to. Basic templates can be found here: [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference]] |
|||
=== Same ref used twice or more === |
|||
The first time a reference appears in the article, you can give it a simple name in the <nowiki><ref></nowiki> code: |
|||
:<nowiki><ref name=smith> DETAILS OF REF </ref></nowiki> |
|||
The second time you use the same reference in the article, you need only to create a short cut instead of typing it all out again: |
|||
:<nowiki><ref name=smith/></nowiki> |
|||
You can then use the short cut as many times as you want. Don't forget the /, or it will blank the rest of the article! A short cut will only pick up from higher up the page, so make sure the first ref is the full one. Some symbols don't work in the ref name, but you'll find out if you use them. |
|||
=== Example === |
|||
You can see refs in action in the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Bowyer_%28artist%29&oldid=102432843 William Bowyer (artist).] There are 3 sources and they are each referenced 3 times. Each statement in the article has a footnote to show what its source is. |
|||
=== Next step === |
|||
When you become familiar with the process, the next step is to have one section, "Footnotes", with links embedded in the text, and another, "References", which lists all of your references alphabetically with full details, e.g. for a book: |
|||
:Lincoln, Abraham; Grant, U. S.; & Davis, Jefferson (1861). ''Resolving Family Differences Peacefully'' (3rd ed.). Gettysburg: Printing Press. ISBN 0-12-345678-9. |
|||
If you're ready to go into it further, these pages have detailed information: |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Citing sources/example style]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Citation templates]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Footnotes]] |
|||
I hope this helps. If you need any assistance, let me know. |
|||
[[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 04:17, 14 March 2007
Previous discussions: February 26 to December 31, 2005, January 1 to June 30, 2006, July 1 to December 30, 2006
Poor Breggin article!
Hi Ombudsman!
I hope everything is going on well with you since our last communication.
I’ve just written in Peter Breggin’s edit summary: “Scuro’s copyedits are extreme POV! Article badly requires a tag (BTW, Barlett’s web cite is NOT a reliable source)”.
Perhaps you may want to take a look at the incredibly POV insertions of a new editor in that article. (I just wrote a similar letter to Anarchist42.) I no longer have Breggin in my Watchlist (I’m overwhelmed in real-life work). Do you have an idea which editor could be willing to watch that article?
--Cesar Tort 03:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
List of Articles Related to Quackery
Care to weigh in here? Always interested in your side of things... [1] Levine2112 00:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- This vote has changed locations and the page title has changed. Care to weigh in here? Levine2112 21:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
AfD Nomination: Pilots for 9/11 Truth
An editor has nominated the article Pilots for 9/11 Truth for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilots for 9/11 Truth. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Pilots for 9/11 Truth during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 17:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Rating the ToK
Hi. I'm trying to get members of the Psychology Project to get together and rate the both the quality and importance of the Tree of Knowledge System, along with discussing ways to improve the article. Hope you're interested. Have a great day! EPM 14:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Psychiatric Survivors Movement
You recently reverted a merge of this page into Consumer/Survivor/Ex-patient Movement, with no discussion and only an edit comment to explain. The merge suggestion tag had been on the page since December (with a brief interlude when it was replaced with an outright deletion tag) and the rationale for the merge had been clarified on the talk page, with other suggestions or objections requested, several times since then, before anything was done. No objections or alternative suggestions were raised, by you or anyone else. Therefore, your reversion of this careful work feels quite offensive, and against Wikipedia guidelines. I would like to discuss and establish a consensus - please would you engage in discussion on the article's talk page? I'm going to clarify further the rationale for the merge there. EverSince 10:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Psychiatric survivors movement
If you look in the history of the page you reverted you will see there was a merge discussion, so your rv may not have been exactly proper. Vees 19:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Also, that is by no means a minor edit. Vees 19:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
David Ayoub
Before we get deeper into what could quickly turn into an edit war, let's discuss the section that you find problematic on the talk page of the article. Maybe we can make it better, so it doesn't appear like a personal attack to you. Oh, and please don't make the section headlines haliographic. They are descriptive as they are, and NPOV. --Kristjan Wager 08:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Helping out with the Unassessed Wikipedia Biographies
Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of [unassessed articles] tagged with {{WPBiography}}. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 21:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikiproject Biography March 2007 Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 21:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Request for peer review
The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Please note that the initial article has been deleted per WP:BLP, as there was a clear statement that death had been caused by negligence or worse and this was not referenced. Please do not reinstate it unless it has cast iron references. Tyrenius 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)