No edit summary |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
::::Oh, I meant to ask this earlier, but it slipped my mind. What are all the commendations you received off-wiki for? <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 06:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC) |
::::Oh, I meant to ask this earlier, but it slipped my mind. What are all the commendations you received off-wiki for? <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 06:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::::Excellent work! Congratulations! :) <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 06:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC) |
:::::Excellent work! Congratulations! :) <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 06:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
== You need to see a psychiatric bro! == |
|||
Don't you understand simple English! [[Humanyun's Tomb]] and [[Lotus Temple]] are not in [[New Delhi]]. So why do you put their images on New Delhi? Do you need some help? --[[User:Jai Dixit|Jai Dixit]] 04:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:If I have been incivil, you have been extremely stubborn and childish. You are so obsessed to add "stunning" images to articles, that you ignore their relevance to the subject. You remove an image on Laxminarayan Temple and add one on Akshardham, which lies in [[South Delhi]]! Let me ask you a question: What do you know about New Delhi apart from the fact that it is the capital of India? See, there is a limit to everything and one thing is for sure.. it is extremely difficult to work with you. I seriously recommend that you learn to work in teams. And please, go ahead and "report me". Gosh.. how old are you again? --07:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jai Dixit|Jai Dixit]] ([[User talk:Jai Dixit|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jai Dixit|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:BTW, I must say that you have done a great job by adding good images from Flickr to articles on various Indian cities. But, you cannot add good images at the expense of their relevance. --[[User:Jai Dixit|Jai Dixit]] 07:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Let us not even go there. You add [[:Image:New Delhi North.jpg]] which is photoshopped. How can u add such images to an encyclopedia?! And talking about attitude, you won't even discuss on the talk-page. Just blindly revert any edit which u don't like and call them "pointless". For example, in this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Delhi&diff=172770141&oldid=172697659] you reverted some of the copyedits that I had done. How can u expect respect without showing the same to others? You reap what you sow. --[[User:Jai Dixit|Jai Dixit]] 00:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Also, I notice that you don't write edit summaries. So, please u don't teach me Wikipedia rules and guidelines. --[[User:Jai Dixit|Jai Dixit]] 00:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:45, 4 December 2007
VT image
Nikkul, The Image:Vict.jpg was good find! I saw that flickr had a higher resolution available and therefore replaced your upload with the higher resolution version and corrected the license version (cc-by-2.0 rather than cc-by-2.5). Cheers. Abecedare 02:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- To see all the versions, look just above the top-left corner of the image on flickr for "All sizes". Then you can see all the available sizes, and if the license is compatible (and the image has encyclopedic value) you can upload it on wikipedia. By the way, make sure to update the license version while/after uploading - you can do so by simply editing the license section and hand editing the license template to, say, {{cc-by-2.0}}, {{cc-by-sa-2.0}} etc. That will ensure that no one deletes these images from wikipedia due to incorrect licensing information. Hope that helps! Abecedare 02:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- I updated the Image:Vidhana Soudha.jpg image that you had uploaded to a higher resolution version and correct license. If/when you have the time, perhaps you can go over your flickr uploads and re-upload the highest resolution versions. Cheers. Abecedare 02:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Image
Hi, thanks for uploading Image:Bangalore.jpg. When uploading CC-attrib or CC-SA-Attrib images, it is important to indicate the exact source (url) and author's name. I would appreciate it if you clarify the source and author of the image since the image is still liable to be deleted without this information. Thanks AreJay 15:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Images
Nice find for the BSE image. Hope we can get one that also contains the "rotunda" though ...
By the way, Image:Bulltemple.jpg is copyrighted [1] and will have to be deleted from wikipedia soon. Perhaps the photographer can be requested to release it under the CC/CC-BY license and then it can be reuploaded. Cheers. Abecedare 01:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Dakshineswar Temple
Thanks for the awesome image of the Dakshineswar Kali Temple, cheers Jeroje 10:04, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
A note about your pics
Hey Nikkul, nice pics you've started adding there. But I must say that pics like the Yamuna and the Mumbai bandstand one may not make the grade. They're nice pics and can make nice posters or wallpapers.. but I dont think they have enough 'distinguishing features' in them to make them encyclpedic/worthy of the India page. What I mean is.. unlike the Kerala backwaters pic, which is a signature postcard of Kerala, the Yamuna pic especially has nothing in it to convey that it is the Yamuna.. it could be a pic of a sunset by any river. Right? Anyway, these are my first thoughts. I suggest that you go a little slow with adding pics to that page till more people weigh in. That page is only meant to be a sort of a test page. Sarvagnya 02:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well, im pretty sure theres going to be a discussion on which images make thefinal rotation,so im just adding images so that we can pick the best out of the bunch.Nikkul 05:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Tourism in India
Sorry, must have hit the wrong button. It does good now. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. 03:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Attention required
If you notice, the article on New Delhi contains numerous data on the entire metropolis of Delhi. Because you have contributed extensively to the article, please make sure that the content of the article is on New Delhi only. Thanks --Lokantha 06:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
IN show in Kolkata
The IN ships will be in Kolkata [2] If you can take some photos it would be great. Chanakyathegreat 04:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Mumbai port and airport data
I am not sure if the data applied only to Mumbai's air traffic, or to both sea and air traffic.
Anyways, the first link applies to Mumbai's premier position as a sea port. In the next line, we speak of Mumbai handling half of India's sea (in context) and air (out of context) traffic. I think we need to introduce Mumbai's sea port (already done in the first line) and airport before mentioning the quantum of traffic being handled.
Pizzadeliveryboy (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Question
I was just perusing around, and I stumbled upon your userpage. I saw the prices (in lakhs) of the cars and house bottom of the page, and I thought that it couldn't be right. What exactly are you basing your figures off of? For example, I have a Honda Civic, and I know for a fact that it did not cost 10 lakhs ($25,000 at current rate), even if you count all the other extraneous charges, in addition to the MSRP of the car. Cheers, Nishkid64 (talk) 03:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ah okay, thanks for the explanation. My parents have a Civic in my hometown in New Jersey. I'm a freshman in college, so you can guess what my age is. Is that how old you are also? Nishkid64 (talk) 05:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
You need to see a psychiatric bro!
Don't you understand simple English! Humanyun's Tomb and Lotus Temple are not in New Delhi. So why do you put their images on New Delhi? Do you need some help? --Jai Dixit 04:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- If I have been incivil, you have been extremely stubborn and childish. You are so obsessed to add "stunning" images to articles, that you ignore their relevance to the subject. You remove an image on Laxminarayan Temple and add one on Akshardham, which lies in South Delhi! Let me ask you a question: What do you know about New Delhi apart from the fact that it is the capital of India? See, there is a limit to everything and one thing is for sure.. it is extremely difficult to work with you. I seriously recommend that you learn to work in teams. And please, go ahead and "report me". Gosh.. how old are you again? --07:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jai Dixit (talk • contribs)
- BTW, I must say that you have done a great job by adding good images from Flickr to articles on various Indian cities. But, you cannot add good images at the expense of their relevance. --Jai Dixit 07:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Let us not even go there. You add Image:New Delhi North.jpg which is photoshopped. How can u add such images to an encyclopedia?! And talking about attitude, you won't even discuss on the talk-page. Just blindly revert any edit which u don't like and call them "pointless". For example, in this edit [3] you reverted some of the copyedits that I had done. How can u expect respect without showing the same to others? You reap what you sow. --Jai Dixit 00:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I notice that you don't write edit summaries. So, please u don't teach me Wikipedia rules and guidelines. --Jai Dixit 00:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)