Ncmvocalist (talk | contribs) m →Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Herostratus 2: emphasis |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
::::::Nihonjoe, you are bound by [[Wikipedia:Admin#Administrator_recall|administrator policy]], if you cared to read what I said above. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 14:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
::::::Nihonjoe, you are bound by [[Wikipedia:Admin#Administrator_recall|administrator policy]], if you cared to read what I said above. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 14:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
::::::::You realize that that section is not policy as there has never been consensus to have it become policy (or even a guideline). In fact, there is significant opposition to it becoming a policy or guideline. That section ought to be reworded to indicate that, while it's mentioned on a policy page due to relevance, it is not a policy. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<font color="maroon">Join WikiProject Japan</font>]]!</small> 01:45, 25 June 2010 (UTC) |
::::::::You realize that that section is not policy as there has never been consensus to have it become policy (or even a guideline). In fact, there is significant opposition to it becoming a policy or guideline. That section ought to be reworded to indicate that, while it's mentioned on a policy page due to relevance, it is not a policy. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<font color="maroon">Join WikiProject Japan</font>]]!</small> 01:45, 25 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::::::::You really are not listening: nothing justified the poor judgement you made in this matter, be it during or after the event. There was no consensus that supported demoting the recall section of long-standing [[WP:ADMIN|written admin policy]] or changing the meaning of [[WP:DR|dispute resolution policy]]/[[WP:RFC/U|procedure]]. You didn't even try to find a consensus. Instead, you were desperate to close a [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Herostratus 2|legitimate recall process]] that you weren't happy with and tried to inappropriately further your personal position. This can be seen from your bullying (including the inappropriate close you attempted), and the edit-warring [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators_open_to_recall&diff=369855764&oldid=326531111] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators_open_to_recall&diff=369912404&oldid=369880241] to push your personal (and extreme) views that would rob users of their rights (which at the time, were being exercised in good faith). As an admin (let alone a bureaucrat) of this site, your conduct is best described as grossly inappropriate and your rationales were fundamentally incorrect - if you ''still'' don't understand why, then this marks the beginning of a big problem. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 06:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::You do realize the section of that page you're linking to expressly says it is "completely voluntary", right? I can't see how that section contains anything that binds anyone at all. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 14:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
:::::::You do realize the section of that page you're linking to expressly says it is "completely voluntary", right? I can't see how that section contains anything that binds anyone at all. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 14:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
::::::::'''Comment:''' Essentially agree with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nihonjoe&diff=369914045&oldid=369912211 this comment], by {{user|Lar}}. Cheers, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 17:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
::::::::'''Comment:''' Essentially agree with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nihonjoe&diff=369914045&oldid=369912211 this comment], by {{user|Lar}}. Cheers, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 17:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:20, 25 June 2010
Generally, I'll reply here if you post here, so please watch this page if you want to see my reply. If replying on another page, use the
Volleyball playersI have seen that you edited some volleyball articles. Some players articles, most of them looks outdated. I would like to improve players by country. Could you please choose a country to contribute with? Please take a look on Yekaterina Gamova, Hélia Souza, Serena Ortolani and Kenia Carcaces for a model to follow. Please can you please improve some volleyball players with infobox and some addons? References are very important. Let me know. Oscar987 22:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
WP:CHU/S backlogCome and see. —ΩpenTheWindows™ 20:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
TalkbackHello, Nihonjoe. You have new messages at Courcelles's talk page.
Message added 21:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Asked you another question while I had your attention. Courcelles (talk) 21:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC) He's causing problems with romanization again, this time at Talk:Hepburn romanization#ゐ/ヰ and ゑ/ヱ. Also, he repeatedly removed the ッジ thread from WT:MOS-JA the other day.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC) SFCG Co.-Summary pleaseIf you are intending to wipe the page like that please provide a para on what they were doing.andycjp (talk) 06:04, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
CC-by-SA 3I noticed you have restored the files deleted, my problem has been the removal of attributation that was part of the license the problem with occurinng on text mainly, although I also had one image file also changed by someone. If the files or text retain attributation it complies, when its removed if does not, I hope you understand my reason for the deletions, --Rovington (talk) 12:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Georgiana HoughtonPlease undelete the Georgiana Houghton page. If you had been a little less impatient, I would have added the citations that justified having a wikipedia page for this person. Georgiana Houghton was well known in the 19th C spiritualist movement, was associated with spirit photography, left a legacy of paintings and drawings, was an associate of the Pre-raphaelites and was considered as a precursor artist to the abstract impressionists. She also published two books on spirit photography that are still in print 130 years after her death. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsimpson1100 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
MOS-JAIt seems that I have inadvertantly brought up the tired old discussions because of my recent clarification to the MOS and then responded to Jpatokal about it. The MOS was never changed after either of those first two discussions, but he still thinks that if it's written in katakana and it's not a word native to Japanese prior to the Meiji period, Hepburn does not apply anyway.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC) He's at it again, and he removed the romanization examples I had (all based on the doumoi word) and added {{disputed}}. Although I think this is from the misunderstanding that I was using an existing Okinawan word to show examples of Japanese, Okinawan, and Ainu romanization schemes.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC) AinuVaguely related, do you have any idea why in some places they use "Aynu" and in others it's "Ainu"? When they refer to the language, it's the former, but to Hokkaido its the latter.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
RequestWould it be possible to recreate User:Collectonian with {{retired}} so the rename log is not quite so upfront? Might help with some continued issues. (using IP so this request is not tied to my new name). Can email if need better confirmation. Thanks. 74.192.33.242 (talk) 04:06, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
PingI have sent week 7 status report. Also, I sent an e-mail in which I proposed a "case study" as a way to build common ground. --Tenmei (talk) 22:31, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
New Shinto Task Force project: ShintoHi Joe, I know you must be busy with your God complexesYou always give me good advice on dealing with conflicts (even I don't always follow as well as I should *grin*). How do you recommend dealing with an editor who seems to have a bit of a God complex (i.e. regularly declares implicitly and explicitly that he is better than most, if not all, other editors, "chastizes" people that they should work with humility with him because he "fixed" their mistakes, etc)[1]? I can't really avoid the person since he's insisting on making himself visible at the Films' project and I am a coordinator there until the next election. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Kentaro YabukiI was wondering if you can give the Romaji transliteration of the second work listed on Kentaro Yabuki —Farix (t | c) 18:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Good newsЕлисеева is Russian for Elisséeff; and it caused me to remember writing about Serge Elisséeff at Harvard. It will take time for me to figure out how to explain why this seemed helpful. A more immediate consequence was the opportunity to enjoy effective collaboration. I worked with In ictu oculi in improving the text of William George Aston and Kim Chae-guk. This was a very small illustration of what I hope to encounter whenever I log on to Wikipedia. Good news is good to share. --Tenmei (talk) 21:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Portal Speculative FictionI've re-reviewed the portal and left some revised comments at the portal review page. Espresso Addict (talk) 10:42, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
NotificationI'm notifying you here because this is where you're most active. I wanted to let you know that I nominated an image that you uploaded, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Von_Karman_vortices_off_Rishiri_Island,_Japan.jpg, for Valued Image on Wikimedia Commons. Joe Chill (talk) 22:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Stephan MartinièreHello, I am letting you know that an article you created, Stephan Martinière, has been nominated for deletion, as part of a series of AFDs based on the deletion nomination of List of Magic: The Gathering artists. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Formerly Deleted PageHi Nihonjoe, I am very new to this Wiki world, so I apologize if my terminology doesn't make sense. I want to learn about contributing to wikipedia and decided I would like to write an article about my vocal voach, Diana Yampolsky, but see that you have deleted a page that used her name as the title. I'm not sure what this means in terms of my being able to start a new one with the same page name. The message I saw prompted me to contact you, so here I am :) I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be asking you though and I didn't fully understand the reason for why it was deleted, but I haven't seen the old page either, so I don't know what it is referring to anyway. Some kind of copyright issue. I just don't want the same thing to happen to this new one if I'm going to put the time into making it. Any guidance or information is greatly appreciated Cheers R. Tigress (talk) 22:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Roy (I'm supposed to put those tildes in here, right?)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Herostratus 2This was started by the user himself, as a recall RFA. The page, Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall, leads to what it refers to as "a default procedure and set of criteria", which states, "The venue for re-confirmation is Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. Following a successful recall petition, the admin submits a new RfA, making clear that if it fails, they will resign. (At the admin's discretion, they can resign first and submit a new RfA at their own convenience.) The standard for the RfA, just as for any RfA, is community consensus: if the user has consensus to remain an admin, the RfA is successful; if they lack such consensus, it is unsuccessful. Admins who resign during or as the result of a recall process are considered to have done so "under a cloud" and should re-apply at RfA to regain adminship." Therefore, the RFA page is the proper place for this to take place, as initiated by the admin in question. Please re-open it. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 03:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Nihonjo. If you don't agree with a process then it is fully appropriate for you to raise questions about the process, and start a discussion on alternative methods. It is, however, inappropriate to stop a consensual process mid-flow, as that is disruptive - it may force other people to revert your actions, may destabilise the process, and can create unneeded drama. I admire boldness, and I recognise there is sometimes a fine line between boldness and disruption, so I don't wish you to feel that I am wagging a finger at you, just giving my view that I feel that in this instance boldness was overstepped into disruption. SilkTork *YES! 09:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
I have put this page on pending change protection per request at the pending change queue. However, it seems that this article have a bad history of edit war, and since you know the history of this article better than me, be sure to keep an eye in case if another edit war breaks out, and you are more than welcome to override the PCP by putting it back to semi or full if needed, thanks. 山本一郎 (会話) 06:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
|