Tryptofish (talk | contribs) →Final warning: notification |
TonyBallioni (talk | contribs) m →June 2018: fix |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
In case you did not see my reply to you at COIN, if you ever again cast aspersions about my integrity as you did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AIdeological_bias_on_Wikipedia&type=revision&diff=846129486&oldid=846125349 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AConflict_of_interest%2FNoticeboard&type=revision&diff=846293537&oldid=846290799 here], I will seek sanctions against you at [[WP:AE]]. This conduct is unacceptable.- [[user:MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 🖋 19:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC) |
In case you did not see my reply to you at COIN, if you ever again cast aspersions about my integrity as you did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AIdeological_bias_on_Wikipedia&type=revision&diff=846129486&oldid=846125349 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AConflict_of_interest%2FNoticeboard&type=revision&diff=846293537&oldid=846290799 here], I will seek sanctions against you at [[WP:AE]]. This conduct is unacceptable.- [[user:MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 🖋 19:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC) |
||
:Given {{u|TonyBallioni}}'s recent warning to you about this exact sort of thing, I have drawn his attention to it. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 20:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC) |
:Given {{u|TonyBallioni}}'s recent warning to you about this exact sort of thing, I have drawn his attention to it. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 20:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC) |
||
== June 2018 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=]]To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision and for displaying a battleground mentality and using administrative board to administrative boards to further disputes with other editors on the page [[WP:COIN]], you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] (specifically [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|this section]]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard]]. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' ~~~~}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me ([[Special:EmailUser/TonyBallioni|by email]]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 20:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC) <div class="sysop-show"><hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Standard provision: appeals and modifications|procedure instructing administrators]] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> |
Revision as of 20:59, 17 June 2018
Some thoughts: | |
---|---|
"To avoid unkind criticism: say nothing, be nothing, do nothing."
|
"There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy." |
DYK for Passing on the Right
On 7 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Passing on the Right, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Passing on the Right. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Passing on the Right), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Its bias!
Just so you understand why people seem a bit harsh with your replies. In academic conversations people are weary of editors that claim bias all the time vs understanding that opinions differ. The term bias is used by the far sides of political opponents. Your getting such a big kick back because of your tone (word choices.) Try terms like "not representative" or "slanted". You need to remove the appearance of biases when making observations by not claiming bias all the time. Piercarlo Valdesolo; Jesse Graham (2016). Social Psychology of Political Polarization. Psychology Press. pp. 117–. ISBN 978-1-317-28885-5. {{cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |trans_title=
, |laydate=
, |laysummary=
, and |authormask=
(help).--Moxy (talk) 13:29, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Final warning
In case you did not see my reply to you at COIN, if you ever again cast aspersions about my integrity as you did here and here, I will seek sanctions against you at WP:AE. This conduct is unacceptable.- MrX 🖋 19:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Given TonyBallioni's recent warning to you about this exact sort of thing, I have drawn his attention to it. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."