Maelgwnbot (talk | contribs) m Robot: Template subst per WP:SUBST |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:::Explain what's wrong with the article on the talk page. Then wait for people to comment. And I'm not a pseudo-scholar, I just am trying to keep users to policy whilst explaining what it is to them. And I'm pretty sure defaced is not the word you wanted to use (it means vandalized, basically). And if you're a part of the group, then you have a [[WP:COI]], so you really should not edit the article if opposed. [[User:Gscshoyru|Gscshoyru]] 03:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC) |
:::Explain what's wrong with the article on the talk page. Then wait for people to comment. And I'm not a pseudo-scholar, I just am trying to keep users to policy whilst explaining what it is to them. And I'm pretty sure defaced is not the word you wanted to use (it means vandalized, basically). And if you're a part of the group, then you have a [[WP:COI]], so you really should not edit the article if opposed. [[User:Gscshoyru|Gscshoyru]] 03:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
::::Hi there. I have explained in the talk page what is wrong with it however the original author continues to revert the page back to his claims without providing us any references, sources and evidence for his claim. The article basically covers the same subject matter as the wiki article about Opium production in Afghanistan however it is full of exaggerated claims and maliciously attaches an ethnicity to these criminal activities without any proof or merit. I dont wish to play edit/undo game. The author clearly doesn’t want to discuss the matter since he is clearly exposed. What can be done in this matter? Can an admin moderate participate and take action? Regards, [[User:NangOnamos|NangOnamos]] 02:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Basically, both of you need to stop editing the article and start discussing. Because you're both close to violating the [[WP:3RR]]. If you're looking for outside input, [[WP:RFC]] is the place to go. And I'll take a closer look at this in the morning myself, and see what's really going on here. [[User:Gscshoyru|Gscshoyru]] 04:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:06, 18 October 2007
Welcome!
Hi NangOnamos! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Pashtun Mafia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
I'd suggest going through some lengthy discussion on the talk page, before going ahead with any deletions.
--Madchester 02:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
It was your mistake. In the edit summary I gave specific reasons as to why they are being removed. The original author has the option to discuss it with us though untill it is cleared how can this misinformation be allowed? NangOnamos 03:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
October 2007
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pashtun Mafia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Gscshoyru 05:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pashtun Mafia, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Pashtun Mafia was changed by NangOnamos (c) (t) deleting 15053 characters on 2007-10-16T05:41:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 05:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Pashtun Mafia page
you said 'Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted.' Can I ask you based on what did you determind that it wasn't contructive? My edits of disinformation werent constructive or didnt "appeare" constructive yet distructive disinformation about an ethnic group is allowed and reverted back? NangOnamos 05:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- That much blanking without discussion needs do be discussed, long term, on the talk page first, ok? Period. You simply removed the whole article! Please explain your reasoning on the talk page and come to consensus with other editors before removing quite so much content. Thanks! Gscshoyru 12:31, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Mr. Period. The original author of the article has been defaced and has not replied back. Please suggest what should be our next step in regards disinformation on that page (whote page) on wiki about my ethnic group? Since you are the pesudeo cyber scholar of the WikiPedia of facts, I need your suggestion on how to deal with it since your administrators have admitted that they are hopless in such matters and encouraged me to take matters in my own hands. NangOnamos 03:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Explain what's wrong with the article on the talk page. Then wait for people to comment. And I'm not a pseudo-scholar, I just am trying to keep users to policy whilst explaining what it is to them. And I'm pretty sure defaced is not the word you wanted to use (it means vandalized, basically). And if you're a part of the group, then you have a WP:COI, so you really should not edit the article if opposed. Gscshoyru 03:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hi there. I have explained in the talk page what is wrong with it however the original author continues to revert the page back to his claims without providing us any references, sources and evidence for his claim. The article basically covers the same subject matter as the wiki article about Opium production in Afghanistan however it is full of exaggerated claims and maliciously attaches an ethnicity to these criminal activities without any proof or merit. I dont wish to play edit/undo game. The author clearly doesn’t want to discuss the matter since he is clearly exposed. What can be done in this matter? Can an admin moderate participate and take action? Regards, NangOnamos 02:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Basically, both of you need to stop editing the article and start discussing. Because you're both close to violating the WP:3RR. If you're looking for outside input, WP:RFC is the place to go. And I'll take a closer look at this in the morning myself, and see what's really going on here. Gscshoyru 04:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)