Miki Filigranski (talk | contribs) |
You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war on Khan Shaykhun chemical attack. (TW) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Miki Filigranski, why did you ignore this warning? You are making revert after revert on this page, and you even mark them in your edit summaries as reverts. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khan_Shaykhun_chemical_attack&diff=774601831&oldid=774600835],[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khan_Shaykhun_chemical_attack&diff=774603743&oldid=774603054]. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 15:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC) |
Miki Filigranski, why did you ignore this warning? You are making revert after revert on this page, and you even mark them in your edit summaries as reverts. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khan_Shaykhun_chemical_attack&diff=774601831&oldid=774600835],[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khan_Shaykhun_chemical_attack&diff=774603743&oldid=774603054]. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 15:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
:I did not ignore the warning. Don't falsely accuse other editors, don't violate [[WP:GOODFAITH]]. These were not reverts of your edit, yet with your edit you removed reliable information and sources without any substantiation, becuase there was change in article main style (removal of section).--[[User:Miki Filigranski|Miki Filigranski]] ([[User talk:Miki Filigranski#top|talk]]) 16:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC) |
:I did not ignore the warning. Don't falsely accuse other editors, don't violate [[WP:GOODFAITH]]. These were not reverts of your edit, yet with your edit you removed reliable information and sources without any substantiation, becuase there was change in article main style (removal of section).--[[User:Miki Filigranski|Miki Filigranski]] ([[User talk:Miki Filigranski#top|talk]]) 16:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
== April 2017 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Khan Shaykhun chemical attack]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 16:08, 9 April 2017 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
Revision as of 16:08, 9 April 2017
Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
--NeilN talk to me 17:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Untitled
Miki Filigranski, why did you ignore this warning? You are making revert after revert on this page, and you even mark them in your edit summaries as reverts. [1],[2]. My very best wishes (talk) 15:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- I did not ignore the warning. Don't falsely accuse other editors, don't violate WP:GOODFAITH. These were not reverts of your edit, yet with your edit you removed reliable information and sources without any substantiation, becuase there was change in article main style (removal of section).--Miki Filigranski (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
April 2017
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN talk to me 16:08, 9 April 2017 (UTC)