Eraserhead1 (talk | contribs) |
→March 2011: stay off my talk page |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adoption_of_Ala%27a_Eddeen&diff=prev&oldid=418022082 Look who is talking] D: D8. Removing tags from the main page article is not only appropriate, but is a good practice. putting tags to the main page's articles is unhelpful to say the least. Main page is a face of wikipedia, and what wikipedia readers will see when they go the article? Ah, who cares?--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 21:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adoption_of_Ala%27a_Eddeen&diff=prev&oldid=418022082 Look who is talking] D: D8. Removing tags from the main page article is not only appropriate, but is a good practice. putting tags to the main page's articles is unhelpful to say the least. Main page is a face of wikipedia, and what wikipedia readers will see when they go the article? Ah, who cares?--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 21:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Which policy are you talking about that says tagging articles that are on the main page is inappropriate? Tags should be left up generally until the dispute is over, that's why I re-instated them. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 21:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
::Which policy are you talking about that says tagging articles that are on the main page is inappropriate? Tags should be left up generally until the dispute is over, that's why I re-instated them. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 21:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lihaas&diff=prev&oldid=409046239 this one]. It is a bad practice to tag articles that are displaying at the main page. Why you could not wait 40 minutes or so to add those absolutely unwarranted tags? I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eraserhead1&diff=prev&oldid=418025429 asked you to stay off my page]. All feature messages from you will be removed with no reading. --[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 21:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:58, 9 March 2011
archives 1 |
Sorry!
Please do write to me about anything Kabbalah related, if you may need any assistance, if I could help! Sorry! - I do not have my own computer, and every few months have an urgent internet cafe emergency wikipedia editing binge, before upcoming chaos may soon prevent me from any wikipedia work! I began editing in 2008, and since 2009 it's been a big rush to minimally bring Kabbalah and Hasidism pages up to minimal level (getting there slowly!)- too much pressure and responsibility on me! I've added a link to you on my user talk page, so please contact me if you wish. Thanks so much for all your Kabbalah pages work - was it you who added the brilliant literature and science section on Ayin (Kabbalah)? Next week I've got some extra important additions to the page, and I'll transfer most of the cross-referenced-linked Atzmus section to that page, where I'll be able to develop it there! Best Wishes and thanks April8 (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ah April8, of course it was me, who added "the brilliant literature and science section on Ayin (Kabbalah)". Please notice, if you ever see anything "brilliant" on wikipedia, it means it was added and/or created by me :-)
- OK, I had in mind one more Kabbalah's subject that I was going to write an article about, but I will not.
- Good luck in dealing with the upcoming chaos.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Adoption of Ala'a Eddeen
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Adoption of Ala'a Eddeen. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop removing the tags from the article -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:27, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Look who is talking D: D8. Removing tags from the main page article is not only appropriate, but is a good practice. putting tags to the main page's articles is unhelpful to say the least. Main page is a face of wikipedia, and what wikipedia readers will see when they go the article? Ah, who cares?--Mbz1 (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Which policy are you talking about that says tagging articles that are on the main page is inappropriate? Tags should be left up generally until the dispute is over, that's why I re-instated them. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- this one. It is a bad practice to tag articles that are displaying at the main page. Why you could not wait 40 minutes or so to add those absolutely unwarranted tags? I asked you to stay off my page. All feature messages from you will be removed with no reading. --Mbz1 (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC)