Warning: Three-revert rule on Thangjing Hill. Tag: Twinkle |
→February 2024: Comment |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 22:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 22:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
: You have done three reverts already. Better watch out! -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 22:51, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:51, 15 February 2024
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
past discussion at archive
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Persian Gulf on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Western Sahara on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your mail
Hello Luwanglinux! I received your mail. Here's my reply:-
- https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/the-story-of-a-giant-python-called-poubi-lai/article7449693.ece
- https://nationalmuseumindia.gov.in/assets/pdf/Poubi-Lai-Activity-Sheet.pdf
- https://www.indiaculture.gov.in/poubi-lai-inspiring-young-minds
- https://indiaculture.gov.in/poubi-lai-story-giant-python
- https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=123469
- https://e-pao.net/GP.asp?src=13..220715.jul15
- https://www.telegraphindia.com/north-east/loktak-s-mythical-python-lives-on-in-wood/cid/1391819
- https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/snake-tales/lite/
- Haoreima thanks but most of these seems not peer reviewed sources and I doubt it can fulfil reliability of historicity 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 02:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:Sanamahism sidebar templates has been nominated for splitting
Category:Sanamahism sidebar templates has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
Your recent editing history at Thangjing Hill shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)