Uzma Gamal (talk | contribs) |
Uzma Gamal (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Logos-Word, I added some comments to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Armstrong (Catholic apologist)]]. -- [[User:Uzma Gamal|Uzma Gamal]] ([[User talk:Uzma Gamal|talk]]) 13:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC) |
* Logos-Word, I added some comments to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Armstrong (Catholic apologist)]]. -- [[User:Uzma Gamal|Uzma Gamal]] ([[User talk:Uzma Gamal|talk]]) 13:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
* I'm sorry for implying wrong actions on your part at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dave_Armstrong_(Catholic_apologist) the AfD]. I didn't mean to, but it apparently does read that way. I feel bad about it and I'll work towards avoiding making such posts. -- [[User:Uzma Gamal|Uzma Gamal]] ([[User talk:Uzma Gamal|talk]]) 12:38, 14 October 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:38, 14 October 2012
Welcome!
|
October 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dave Armstrong (Catholic apologist) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Dave Armstrong (Catholic apologist) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2006/07/my-literary-resume.html, http://socrates58.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:21, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Logos-Word, I added some comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Armstrong (Catholic apologist). -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for implying wrong actions on your part at the AfD. I didn't mean to, but it apparently does read that way. I feel bad about it and I'll work towards avoiding making such posts. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:38, 14 October 2012 (UTC)