→Ahoy matey!: avast, thar be anot'er scruvy dog! |
→Ahoy matey!: - Aye |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:I started playing back in [[Invasion (Magic: The Gathering)|Invasion]] block, and got really into it during [[Time Spiral]], but I fizzled due to lack of funds and rising interest here. So I know enough of the jargon from the Spike-ish time to actually have some idea what I'm doin' there. :P |
:I started playing back in [[Invasion (Magic: The Gathering)|Invasion]] block, and got really into it during [[Time Spiral]], but I fizzled due to lack of funds and rising interest here. So I know enough of the jargon from the Spike-ish time to actually have some idea what I'm doin' there. :P |
||
:That aside, I'm glad I'm working with someone who has more experience in this area. I like to think I've got a pretty good sense of what is and isn't disruptive/a personal attack/etc., but I'll be the first to admit I don't know all the background involving the Pseudoscience case, though the sanctions themselves are relatively straightforward. I hope to have some time to read through a lot of it this weekend, but I'm also working on copyediting [[Magic: The Gathering]] before 0.7 on the 2nd. If you need anything, feel free to email me or contact me here. I'm also happy to give additional contact information by email. Cheers. <font color="green">[[User:Lifebaka|''lifebaka'']]</font>[[User talk:Lifebaka|'''++''']] 01:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
:That aside, I'm glad I'm working with someone who has more experience in this area. I like to think I've got a pretty good sense of what is and isn't disruptive/a personal attack/etc., but I'll be the first to admit I don't know all the background involving the Pseudoscience case, though the sanctions themselves are relatively straightforward. I hope to have some time to read through a lot of it this weekend, but I'm also working on copyediting [[Magic: The Gathering]] before 0.7 on the 2nd. If you need anything, feel free to email me or contact me here. I'm also happy to give additional contact information by email. Cheers. <font color="green">[[User:Lifebaka|''lifebaka'']]</font>[[User talk:Lifebaka|'''++''']] 01:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
:: Sure, you can email me at elonka@aol.com, and I'm also on several of the IM clients (AIM, GTalk, etc.). Regarding MtG, I actually got involved with it early on, and have many Alpha cards in my collection. I collected obsessively through Arabian Nights, Antiquities, Legends, and then started fading around the "Ice Age" time period, but I still play when I can. We had some wonderful big multiplayer "Emperor" games going on in my office. My favorite deck is a little red/green one, which I made when I got into an argument with someone about whether they ''had'' to have rare or high-mana cards in order to have a chance at winning. So I made a deck composed entirely of 1 and 2-mana common red/green cards, to prove my point. :) |
|||
:: In terms of the Chiropractic article, feel free to ask for advice, but I'm more inclined to sit back and watch you at work. ;) The main reason I got interested was because I saw that the editing atmosphere had gotten toxic for quite awhile there, and there was no real admin presence. So I was willing to strap on my armor and wade in, but if someone else wants to do it, I'm fine on putting my feet up and munching popcorn. :) Oh, I do recommend adding a few pages to your watchlist. Like on the log page, check the list of "editors notified of restrictions", and add their talkpages to your watchlist. There's been a fair amount of overflow of the dispute to those pages, so it may help give you a more rounded view of what's going on. Best, --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 01:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:42, 26 September 2008
Archives
| |||||||
|
Please add new comments in . I will respond to messages here unless you ask otherwise. Or, if you're notifying me of a problem, I'll probably just fix it and leave it at that. I can also be contacted by email.
Hi Lifebaka. You put full protection on this article on 28 August. Per WP:Suspected sock puppets/Wtcsurvivor I think the registered socks that have been at all active are all blocked. If you check Talk:William Rodriguez you'll probably notice the subject still editing his Talk page as an IP-hopper. You could probably lighten the full protection of the article to indefinite semi protection and things would work out OK. EdJohnston (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds fine to me, I've put it on indefinite semi. As a general note, I'm fine if people fix these sorts of things without coming to me first, since I'm not always going to follow what's going on at the page. Cheers. lifebaka++ 17:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, noted. EdJohnston (talk) 01:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- IT is unfair for other users to be unable to balance the view of just 2 people that have already suggested negative point of view against Rodriguez on the talk page, (user Jazz2006 and Contrivance). Requesting full protection or full un-protection. Thanks.Celeronel (talk) 04:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, noted. EdJohnston (talk) 01:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Earl's List
I see from this article that you were an administration relating to the talks about deleting the "Earl's list" page. I am contributor at My Name is Earl Wiki, and I used that page to update some of the information there. I am not asking for a page restore, I was just wondering if it would be possible to have the contents of the page to use for reference in helping with the ongoing production of Earl Wiki. Any help you can offer in this respect would be very much appreciated. SignorSimon (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, done? SignorSimon (talk) 06:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- I emailed it to you. If you didn't get it, send me an email from the address you'd like it sent to at [lifebaka@gmail.com and I'll send over another copy. Cheers. lifebaka++ 14:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Sir William Arbuthnot, 2nd Baronet
please would you speedy delete this talk page under G8. Kittybrewster ☎ 20:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- The page is a redirect, so it doesn't actually fall under G8. Instead I redirected it to match the article. Cheers. lifebaka++ 12:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. I suspect it won't "stick" because it didn't do so last time - see Tikiwont's edit in the history. Kittybrewster ☎ 12:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Template talk:Drvlinks
A request for you here. Thanks. -- Suntag ☼ 02:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Cal Chamberlain DRV
Thank you for restoring the article to my sandbox, and yes it wasn't pretty. Anyway, I've reviewed the article and had I been aware that it was going to be speedied I would have asked for a regular AfD. Do I need to do anything in particular to shift this from a temporary restoration to a full fledged deletion review? AniMate 07:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Since it hasn't been closed, there's no need to open another one. It looks like you made it clear you don't think it made A7 over there, so things should turn out just fine. People have also helpfully begun discussion as well. Cheers. lifebaka++ 13:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, sorry, but you are the only admin who has commented on the request for a reversal of the GUE speedy deletion.
As per your suggestion, one of the other Wikipedian divers has put together a stub in my namespace below my "list of reasons", so I am not sure if that changes your view on endorsing the deletion.
[Will monitor this page for replies]
--Legis (talk - contribs) 16:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Deletion Review
Can you please review the article about Ayusha Shrestha thank you (NepaliBoy7 (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)).
- It was deleted as a result of this AfD. So, exactly what sort of problem do you have with it? lifebaka++ 20:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey, regarding your edit to Rajsaurus Narmadensis, I agree with your deletion of that content, I just want to warn you, that user has been determinedly and repeatedly undoing people's edits and working on that article, removing deletion requests and move templates that people put up. So he might end up trying to restore the version from before we put the redirect up; if it keeps happening, we might be able to get the article deleted and then protected or something to keep him from restoring it. --Politizer (talk) 17:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- We could, yes, but probably we should talk to him first. That's often the step that's missing in these issues. Of course, if he ignores the "You have new messages!" bar at the top of every page, there's not much that can be done. Cheers. lifebaka++ 17:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review for Fábio Pereira da Silva
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Fábio Pereira da Silva. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. You were one of four admins who deleted this article. I got the request to UNSALT and have listed at DRV since I'm not comfortable enough with WP:ATHLETE to make the call and wanted community discussion since that's what resulted in its deletion. TravellingCari 21:20, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Ahoy matey!
Saw your name at the log page. Welcome aboard! :) I see we have a common interest in Magic: the Addiction. ;) Which booster set did you first get involved with? Anyway, looking forward to working with you... --Elonka 01:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- I started playing back in Invasion block, and got really into it during Time Spiral, but I fizzled due to lack of funds and rising interest here. So I know enough of the jargon from the Spike-ish time to actually have some idea what I'm doin' there. :P
- That aside, I'm glad I'm working with someone who has more experience in this area. I like to think I've got a pretty good sense of what is and isn't disruptive/a personal attack/etc., but I'll be the first to admit I don't know all the background involving the Pseudoscience case, though the sanctions themselves are relatively straightforward. I hope to have some time to read through a lot of it this weekend, but I'm also working on copyediting Magic: The Gathering before 0.7 on the 2nd. If you need anything, feel free to email me or contact me here. I'm also happy to give additional contact information by email. Cheers. lifebaka++ 01:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, you can email me at elonka@aol.com, and I'm also on several of the IM clients (AIM, GTalk, etc.). Regarding MtG, I actually got involved with it early on, and have many Alpha cards in my collection. I collected obsessively through Arabian Nights, Antiquities, Legends, and then started fading around the "Ice Age" time period, but I still play when I can. We had some wonderful big multiplayer "Emperor" games going on in my office. My favorite deck is a little red/green one, which I made when I got into an argument with someone about whether they had to have rare or high-mana cards in order to have a chance at winning. So I made a deck composed entirely of 1 and 2-mana common red/green cards, to prove my point. :)
- In terms of the Chiropractic article, feel free to ask for advice, but I'm more inclined to sit back and watch you at work. ;) The main reason I got interested was because I saw that the editing atmosphere had gotten toxic for quite awhile there, and there was no real admin presence. So I was willing to strap on my armor and wade in, but if someone else wants to do it, I'm fine on putting my feet up and munching popcorn. :) Oh, I do recommend adding a few pages to your watchlist. Like on the log page, check the list of "editors notified of restrictions", and add their talkpages to your watchlist. There's been a fair amount of overflow of the dispute to those pages, so it may help give you a more rounded view of what's going on. Best, --Elonka 01:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)