→December 2015: cmt |
14.100.132.155 (talk) |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Hi {{reply to|Mdann52}} Just to let you know that I reverted these 2 edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=prev&oldid=695365245], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=prev&oldid=695369656] since a lot of reliably cited content (which was added after a discussion on the talk page) was removed. And after each of these 2 edits I posted on the talk page and after the second revert I did not revert any further. If you look at the history of the article [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&action=history] , there seems to have been a chain of such removal of content within the last few hours, in particular reliably cited content [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&type=revision&diff=695354464&oldid=695337117],[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=next&oldid=695356879],[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=next&oldid=695360288], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=next&oldid=695365245], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=next&oldid=695369656]. There has also been a violation of 3RR rule by one user who removed a large chunk of content (see the last 3 links) and has previously been warned about edit warring on the same article. I'm not sure how to deal with this. Should I seek dispute resolution? --[[User:Lemongirl942|Lemongirl942]] ([[User talk:Lemongirl942#top|talk]]) 18:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC) |
:Hi {{reply to|Mdann52}} Just to let you know that I reverted these 2 edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=prev&oldid=695365245], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=prev&oldid=695369656] since a lot of reliably cited content (which was added after a discussion on the talk page) was removed. And after each of these 2 edits I posted on the talk page and after the second revert I did not revert any further. If you look at the history of the article [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&action=history] , there seems to have been a chain of such removal of content within the last few hours, in particular reliably cited content [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&type=revision&diff=695354464&oldid=695337117],[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=next&oldid=695356879],[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=next&oldid=695360288], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=next&oldid=695365245], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calvin_Cheng&diff=next&oldid=695369656]. There has also been a violation of 3RR rule by one user who removed a large chunk of content (see the last 3 links) and has previously been warned about edit warring on the same article. I'm not sure how to deal with this. Should I seek dispute resolution? --[[User:Lemongirl942|Lemongirl942]] ([[User talk:Lemongirl942#top|talk]]) 18:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
::That would be a good step. For reference, I am not assuming any bad faith here, I just delivered this notice to everyone involved in the dispute. [[User:Mdann52|Mdann52]] ([[User talk:Mdann52|talk]]) 18:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC) |
::That would be a good step. For reference, I am not assuming any bad faith here, I just delivered this notice to everyone involved in the dispute. [[User:Mdann52|Mdann52]] ([[User talk:Mdann52|talk]]) 18:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
== February 2016 == |
|||
Hi '''Lemongirl942''" Being a Singaporean you need to take care of yourself when editing because the ISD has been known to trace IPS to real life people. Good luck. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/14.100.132.155|14.100.132.155]] ([[User talk:14.100.132.155|talk]]) 08:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: Hi! Sorry, what do you mean by IPS and ISD? [[User:Lemongirl942|Lemongirl942]] ([[User talk:Lemongirl942#top|talk]]) 09:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Internal security department. IP addresses <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/14.100.132.155|14.100.132.155]] ([[User talk:14.100.132.155|talk]]) 10:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: Hi! Sorry, I still don't understand what you are trying to say. Do you want me to add the statement/quotation to any article? Please mention any suggested edits on the talk page of the article and cite your sources. The statement you wrote does not have any citations. [[User:Lemongirl942|Lemongirl942]] ([[User talk:Lemongirl942#top|talk]]) 10:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:: I see you you are editing the pages of Singapore political people. Please google Internal Security Department and detentions. They can trace you. You seem very young. Do your parents know what you are doing? Please be careful [[Special:Contributions/14.100.132.155|14.100.132.155]] ([[User talk:14.100.132.155|talk]]) 12:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
::: Thank you. I still do not understand the purpose behind tracing me. Just to let you know, Wikipedia is a collaborative project which can be edited by anyone. Even you! Even if you are not an adult. [[User:Lemongirl942|Lemongirl942]] ([[User talk:Lemongirl942#top|talk]]) 14:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
::: Now I am sure you are very young. In Singapore it is dangerous to offend people aligned to the ruling party in Singapore especially political figures. Don't get yourself and your family into trouble . Please talk to your parents. It is not worth wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/14.100.132.155|14.100.132.155]] ([[User talk:14.100.132.155|talk]]) 15:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Sorry, but who have I supposedly offended and how? And why is it dangerous to edit Wikipedia? Wikipedia is a knowledge base which relies on volunteers. [[User:Lemongirl942|Lemongirl942]] ([[User talk:Lemongirl942#top|talk]]) 15:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:::I don't wanna name names because I don't wanna be traced either. Just be careful editing the pages of real life politicians in Singapore. People are watching. You can continue to edit Miss Universe etc but just ask your parents before you go playing with the pages of Singapore politicians pages [[Special:Contributions/14.100.132.155|14.100.132.155]] ([[User talk:14.100.132.155|talk]]) 15:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Well if you cannot name even a single person I am supposedly offending, I have to conclude that I am offending none. In addition, Wikipedia is transparent and open to scrutiny. [[User:Lemongirl942|Lemongirl942]] ([[User talk:Lemongirl942#top|talk]]) 16:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
::: How many politicians pages are you editing???? This is not about Wikipedia. This is about your real life Anyway I am not your parent. If you don't take my concern it is ok. Good day [[Special:Contributions/14.100.132.155|14.100.132.155]] ([[User talk:14.100.132.155|talk]]) 16:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:24, 20 February 2016
Lemongirl942, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Lemongirl942! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC) |
December 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Calvin Cheng. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mdann52 (talk) 17:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @Mdann52: Just to let you know that I reverted these 2 edits [1], [2] since a lot of reliably cited content (which was added after a discussion on the talk page) was removed. And after each of these 2 edits I posted on the talk page and after the second revert I did not revert any further. If you look at the history of the article [3] , there seems to have been a chain of such removal of content within the last few hours, in particular reliably cited content [4],[5],[6], [7], [8]. There has also been a violation of 3RR rule by one user who removed a large chunk of content (see the last 3 links) and has previously been warned about edit warring on the same article. I'm not sure how to deal with this. Should I seek dispute resolution? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
February 2016
Hi 'Lemongirl942" Being a Singaporean you need to take care of yourself when editing because the ISD has been known to trace IPS to real life people. Good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.100.132.155 (talk) 08:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi! Sorry, what do you mean by IPS and ISD? Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Internal security department. IP addresses — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.100.132.155 (talk) 10:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi! Sorry, I still don't understand what you are trying to say. Do you want me to add the statement/quotation to any article? Please mention any suggested edits on the talk page of the article and cite your sources. The statement you wrote does not have any citations. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- I see you you are editing the pages of Singapore political people. Please google Internal Security Department and detentions. They can trace you. You seem very young. Do your parents know what you are doing? Please be careful 14.100.132.155 (talk) 12:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. I still do not understand the purpose behind tracing me. Just to let you know, Wikipedia is a collaborative project which can be edited by anyone. Even you! Even if you are not an adult. Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Now I am sure you are very young. In Singapore it is dangerous to offend people aligned to the ruling party in Singapore especially political figures. Don't get yourself and your family into trouble . Please talk to your parents. It is not worth wikipedia. 14.100.132.155 (talk) 15:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, but who have I supposedly offended and how? And why is it dangerous to edit Wikipedia? Wikipedia is a knowledge base which relies on volunteers. Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- I don't wanna name names because I don't wanna be traced either. Just be careful editing the pages of real life politicians in Singapore. People are watching. You can continue to edit Miss Universe etc but just ask your parents before you go playing with the pages of Singapore politicians pages 14.100.132.155 (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Well if you cannot name even a single person I am supposedly offending, I have to conclude that I am offending none. In addition, Wikipedia is transparent and open to scrutiny. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- How many politicians pages are you editing???? This is not about Wikipedia. This is about your real life Anyway I am not your parent. If you don't take my concern it is ok. Good day 14.100.132.155 (talk) 16:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)