Reverted 1 edit by François Robere (talk): User may remove comments -- see WP:BLANKING. (TW) |
François Robere (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
Removing large quantities of cited material without adequate rationale and posting strong language (including personal attacks) on edit histories and talk pages is not appropriate editing behavior, regardless of one's history as an editor. Disruptive editing does not require additional discussion, and continued disruptive editing may be reported. [[User:Sturgeontransformer|Sturgeontransformer]] ([[User talk:Sturgeontransformer|talk]]) 19:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |
Removing large quantities of cited material without adequate rationale and posting strong language (including personal attacks) on edit histories and talk pages is not appropriate editing behavior, regardless of one's history as an editor. Disruptive editing does not require additional discussion, and continued disruptive editing may be reported. [[User:Sturgeontransformer|Sturgeontransformer]] ([[User talk:Sturgeontransformer|talk]]) 19:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
:{{re|Sturgeontransformer}} Yeah... That's your sayso. I have not attacked anyone personally, I have criticized the text, which is a sham at this point. Please include a few actual arguments '''on the appropriate talk page''' and '''do not post here again''' if all you have are vapid accusations. [[User:Kleuske|Kleuske]] ([[User talk:Kleuske#top|talk]]) 19:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |
:{{re|Sturgeontransformer}} Yeah... That's your sayso. I have not attacked anyone personally, I have criticized the text, which is a sham at this point. Please include a few actual arguments '''on the appropriate talk page''' and '''do not post here again''' if all you have are vapid accusations. [[User:Kleuske|Kleuske]] ([[User talk:Kleuske#top|talk]]) 19:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
:: Hey darling, apparently I'm now to inform you the whole thing was moved to [[WP:DRN]]. The admins seem in a bind on what to do exactly, but it's really not that complicated. Do come and state your mind, won't you dear? Thanks! [[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 02:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:58, 20 December 2017
Comexi Group
Dear Kleuske,
Thanks for your message and for the information. I do not have any conflict of interest with Comexi, as you commented. I work for Comexi taking care of its communication but I totally understand editorial line of Wikipedia. The info that is showed currently is totally incorrect. The page, as initially was created, is not correct; that is why I saw it, created an user and try to fix it.
Please, you or any other member of Wikpedia could check all my changes done this September 27th? You'll see that there is no promotional text. Besides, I have added pictures, logo and other interesting information in order to complete the page.
If you prefer, in case that I'm not the correct person in order to write the text for this page, you can do it yourself or if any other member of this community is able to do it with the information I added, feel totally free to do it but with the correct information and not the old one that is shown currently. Let me know if I can help with any other elements.
Thanks again for your attention,
Best regards and looking forward to hear from you,
NGuisasola (talk) 15:34, 27 September 2017 (UTC)NGuisasola
- @NGuisasola: Working for company X and editing the article of company X is the very definition of a conflict of interest. Yes, I know you work there, hence the COI-welcome. Please stick to the rules (disclosure and suggesting alterations on the talk page) instead of trying to bullshit me. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 22:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske,
I'm sorry. It was not at all my intention to bullshit you. I didn't know the rules about disclosure and suggesting alterations on the talk page. Thanks for the information and I apologize. NGuisasola (talk) 06:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)NGuisasola
Renovation of images?
Can I replace a few images or almost all on 3d rendering related pages? Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_graphics The images need a renovation. STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 11:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
why not? outdated stuff is bad STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 11:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Historical does not equal outdated. We're an encyclopedia, not a CG-magazine. Kleuske (talk) 11:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- These pages are not about historic stuff. ;) They are about current stuff. Not about the Stoneage. So your argument is wrong. You can create a historic page/section and there will be historic images about cgi. STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 11:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Having been in the computing and CG business for almost 30 years, I can assure you that 'Pong' and 'Donkey-Kong' are historic (almost prehistoric) in terms of CG. It is the aim to show progression. Besides, the one example I saw of your preferred images was rather less than impressive, especially if it was intended to show the 'state-of-the-art' CG. Kleuske (talk) 11:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- What is a better example then? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Computer_graphics&action=history STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 11:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Go to commons and look around. What's currently on the page suffices. Kleuske (talk) 11:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- There is nothing good. Majority old images. I wanna use my images. Mine. My image shows what 3d rendering is. And you did not explain in detail what you think. STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 12:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- So that's the point... Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a site on which to publish your own artwork. If you want to publish your work for free, go to Flickr. Kleuske (talk) 12:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- I don't want that. I want to modernize these old looking wikipedia pages. 3d needs a better reputation. If people see these pages they see old and ugly renderings. That is not good. People should get interested in things. That doesn't work with such images as seen on wikipedia. Tell me what images you want to see there.STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- The "old looking" stuff is there for a reason and CG's reputation does not depend on a wikipedia page. Kleuske (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Then tell me what should I make for the 3d pages. If you don't answer or help me, I cannot help wikipedia. How am I supposed to do anything regarding adding or replacing images? Shouldn't you be happy that I want to contribute nice stuff? STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 12:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- The "old looking" stuff is there for a reason and CG's reputation does not depend on a wikipedia page. Kleuske (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- I don't want that. I want to modernize these old looking wikipedia pages. 3d needs a better reputation. If people see these pages they see old and ugly renderings. That is not good. People should get interested in things. That doesn't work with such images as seen on wikipedia. Tell me what images you want to see there.STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- So that's the point... Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a site on which to publish your own artwork. If you want to publish your work for free, go to Flickr. Kleuske (talk) 12:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- There is nothing good. Majority old images. I wanna use my images. Mine. My image shows what 3d rendering is. And you did not explain in detail what you think. STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 12:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Go to commons and look around. What's currently on the page suffices. Kleuske (talk) 11:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- What is a better example then? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Computer_graphics&action=history STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 11:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Having been in the computing and CG business for almost 30 years, I can assure you that 'Pong' and 'Donkey-Kong' are historic (almost prehistoric) in terms of CG. It is the aim to show progression. Besides, the one example I saw of your preferred images was rather less than impressive, especially if it was intended to show the 'state-of-the-art' CG. Kleuske (talk) 11:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- These pages are not about historic stuff. ;) They are about current stuff. Not about the Stoneage. So your argument is wrong. You can create a historic page/section and there will be historic images about cgi. STEWIEMONSTER (talk) 11:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
First off, realize that a page on computer graphics is not the same as a page on 3d rendering (using blender) and requires an historical overview (including old imagery). Then acquire (somehow) a bit of modesty concerning your own work. It really isn't that awe-inspiring. Thirdly remember there's a lot of people writing and editing articles and so far, your main contribution is a distinct pain in my gluteus maximus. Kleuske (talk) 13:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
with regards to WP:MEDRS
If you'd be so kind as to indicate the actual relevant part of WP:MEDRS which indicates the allowance for the removal of the information in the article that would be much appreciated, would save me time from going through the entire section, and would help clarify the issue for us both perhaps, since I feel sure the British medical Journal is a reliable source, although you seem to think policy indicates otherwise , thanks 1a16additional (talk) 12:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- @1a16additional: See WP:BRD. I agree that the BMJ is a reliable source, but, in this case a WP:PRIMARY one. Kleuske (talk) 12:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thank you for your timely response and I see that the policy indicates the importance of primary sources as you have indicated, I will look further into the policy to see how this indicates as you have implied.
Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. - is the first sentence, which indicates the importance of this factor as the opening notion or principle of policy
... any analysis or synthesis of published material that to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources
1a16additional (talk) 12:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- It seems opportune, at this time, to point you to WP:LAWYER. Kleuske (talk) 12:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
with regards to Qnet
Please stop doing what you are doing. I have given sources and link. Its not my own analysis or opinion. There are actual newsreports by credible media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortal4ever (talk • contribs) 23:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
I consider this Electronic harassment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortal4ever (talk • contribs) 23:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Mortal4ever: I consider this a potential noticeboard matter. I'm contemplating wether to bring this to WP:ANI, WP:NPOV/N or WP:COIN. You addition (removed by me) is not worded neutrally and is based on WP:PRIMARY sources (the company's website). To boot, the edit gives WP:UNDUE weight to a few stage appearances. Please peruse WP:V and WP:RS. Thanks.
ReliefWeb
I see you've had an issue on this page before, I think it is important to draw out what the services are a bit more as is a bit vague currently. Without further elaboration on labs a section is missed. Perhaps you could help make this section more appropriate or give some suggestions to help? Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuriousHorse (talk • contribs) 08:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- I strongly suspect you've been told before. See the discussion here.
- Here's the relevant quote:
If people need a detailed description of the services that ReliefWeb provides, well, that's why the ReliefWeb website exists, no? Wikipedia articles should ideally summarize, not regurgitate, information, and they should focus on what reliable sources of information that are independent of the organization have said. Put another way, we are collectively more interested in what others (reliable sources) have said about ReliefWeb than what ReliefWeb has said about itself.
— Wiae- Kleuske (talk) 11:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
I've revised the content, it should be more appropriate now and looks at external sources. Thanks.
Vegan Design
Following up on your involvement in this page's proposed deletion, citations have been added to this page to increase its objectivity and in line with Wikipedia's policies.
In reference to:
Nomination of Vegan design for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vegan design is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegan design until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Cayla Mackey at Unicorn Goods (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Cayla Mackey at Unicorn Goods: Correction. You have inserted a bunch of commercial links which are not reliable sources by a long shot. Kleuske (talk) 13:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Kleuske:According to Wikipedia's definition of reliable sources, "Wikipedia articles are required to present a neutral point of view. However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject." I have added additional sources, as well. -Cayla Mackey at Unicorn Goods (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Ridgefield revert
Please return the page back to it's original. The other editor changed it while RFC discussion was ongoing, and I already reverted back to the original twice.[1] ThanksC. W. Gilmore (talk) 02:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- No. Per WP:Undue. The purchase of a plot and the flying of flags is not a notable event. Kleuske (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Regarding Marlabs
I'm unsure how I'm promoting Marlabs. I was simply trying to inform what Marlabs does. The same information is freely available on their website as well. Should I show you the content I intend to post prior to posting? You can proof read to help me out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arijit.ray81 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes... You were using a tone like a toothpaste commercial to do so. Moreover, LinkedIn lists someone with exactly the same name as you in "Demand Engineering & Marketing Technology". Coincidence? Kleuske (talk) 23:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Stephen Emmer
Dear Kleuske,
Following earlier deletions based on the apparent lack of reliable sources I have edited selected parts (Early Life, Career and Bands) whilst I have added reliable sources. Please find the newly added sections below. Would you please be so kind as to monitor these new additions and let me know your thoughts?
- - - - - - - - - - -
Early Life[edit] He’s the son of former news anchorman Fred Emmer and ballet dancer/actress Roekie Aronds. The majority of his childhood he lived with his mom, with whom he traveled to India where he learned how to play a local wind instrument in an ashram, then Aruba where he learned to play voodoo infused percussion followed by Surinam where he learned how to play the guitar. Upon return to Amsterdam in the early 70’s he studied at the Amsterdam Lyceum where he played in several bands, like Barnstorm and Orange Blues. Following this he teamed up with Reinout Eleveld and Chris Frankemoller to form free-jazz-formation the ‘Chris Frankemoller Trio’. In the late 70’s he joined ‘Hopper’ and ‘Blase’ with Dutch singer Mathilde Santing and Dennis Duchhart.
- - - - - - - - - - -
Career[edit] He’s a music composer for documentaries, tv stations and broadcasting organizations, and composed leaders and musical identities for shows like RTL Late Night [1], RTL Boulevard [2], RTL Nieuws [1] [3], NOS Journaal [4]and NOS (Dutch Broadcasting Foundation) in the early 90’s.
In 1980 he was co-founder and chief editor of Dutch music magazine Vinyl [1] [5], next to hosting and producing RadioNome [2] [6]for Dutch broadcasting organization VPRO. In 1984 he followed the ‘Scoring for Television’ course at the Royal College Of Music in London.
He composed sound and music for 'Van Gogh-Gauguin' and Monsieur Bing at the Van Gogh Museum [3] [7]. In 2006 he designed the identity, sound and music for all interactive installations of the experience for the Dutch institute for image and sound (Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid) in Hilversum [4] [8].
In a close collaboration with dj Joost van Bellen, Mathilde Santing and multitalent Fay Lovsky he produced the soundtrack for two consecutive fashion shows for Marlies Dekkers in 2011.[5] [9]
- - - - - - - - - - -
Bands[edit] In 1979 Emmer joined avantgardist pop band Minny Pops, alongside Dennis Duchhart (guitar), Frans Hagenaars (bass guitar) and Wally van Middendorp (lead vocals), where he played the guitar [6] [10]. He co-composed 7” single ‘Dolphin Spurt’ & ‘Goddess’ [7] [11]. Emmer can only be heard on their first record ‘Drastic Measures, Drastic Movement’ [8] [12].
In 1984 Emmer and Michael Dempsey, former bass guitar player of The Cure, joined The Lotus Eaters [13] from Liverpool. Following this Emmer and Dempsey joined Continental Cast from Amsterdam [9] [14]. He also played guitar on Richenel’s album ‘Deep As Blue' [10] [15].
- - - - - - - - - -
Thank you very much for your time and effort, much appreciated. I look forward to hear back from you at your earliest convenience.
Kind regards,
Maarten Bousie Maartenbousie (talk) 09:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC) (Maartenbousie (talk) 09:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC))
- TL;DR
- Please peruse WP:RS, WP:BLP and WP:COI to find out why I a) have reverted you and b) am contemplating taking this to WP:COIN. Kleuske (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://vimeo.com/127479137
- ^ https://vimeo.com/195781192
- ^ https://vimeo.com/12725621
- ^ https://vimeo.com/127255915
- ^ https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinyl_(tijdschrift)
- ^ https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/RadioNome
- ^ https://vimeo.com/163692171
- ^ http://www.captainvideo.nl/educatief-zakelijk/beeld-en-geluid-wiki/
- ^ https://www.discogs.com/Stephen-Emmer-Feat-Liam-McKahey-Vanessa-Contenay-Quinones-Blown-Away/release/10622665
- ^ http://en.muziekencyclopedie.nl/action/entry/Minny+Pops?name=Minny+Pops&
- ^ https://www.discogs.com/artist/11291-Minny-Pops
- ^ https://www.discogs.com/Minny-Pops-Drastic-Measures-Drastic-Movement/release/786146
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lotus_Eaters_(band)
- ^ https://www.discogs.com/Continental-Cast-End-Of-The-Affair/release/5182200
- ^ https://www.discogs.com/Richenel-Deep-As-Blue/release/84837
marlab
Hello, I am trying to make the page more descriptive. Wanted to change more details which are not accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srikanthboorela (talk • contribs) 12:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sure you are. See WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:PAIDEDITING. You're around since 2011, so that should not be new. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 12:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Medlife
Hello Kleuske. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Medlife, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Subject might be important/significant (see also Google News/Books hits for this subject) / use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead to allow other editors to participate in this decision. Thank you. SoWhy 16:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- @SoWhy: There may be some confusion with a Romanian firm of the same name (which appears to be notable), but I'll leave it for now. Kleuske (talk) 17:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poorvika
how should i fix it in this article
- Show notability. Read WP:CORPDEPTH. Kleuske (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
I am sorry about grumpy cat
my brother thought it would be funny to put that and i apologize in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidsman1234 (talk • contribs) 11:24, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Aidsman1234: You screwed up and then apologized here (after being notified). That's not "in advance", that's "after the fact". Kleuske (talk) 11:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
ELEPHANZ
HI
You blocked one of my edits...I see you ask for a source...Plse specify which section of my edit you are referring too?
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samybh Affectionldn (talk • contribs) 12:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Samybh Affectionldn: "The album has received some good support from Spotify and Deezer with Blowing Like A Storm featuring on nearly 15 playlists and Elephanz making the cover of Spotify's Hot Alternative", which is a) unsourced and b) puffery. Kleuske (talk) 12:12, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Submitting a Draft
Hey
Got your message.
How do I submit draft text to be checked by you?
Thanks
Chris
USwitchSEO (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- You can make suggestions on the talk-page. However, please remember that Wikipedia articles are not company info-pages and promotional language is not tolerated. Kleuske (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
COI-Welcome / Editing Grande Prairie Wiki=
Hey Kleuske, I'm not sure if this welcome I received was due to the e-mail address I used when I signed up or the COI disclaimer I placed on my User page. In either case I hope the disclaimer is enough to comply with the COI policy that I read, if not, do you mind letting me know a better way to do so, so I can be in compliance with the policy. As I stated, I'm not really interested in actually writing the documents, I am just interested in making sure the information is correct, as both Google and Facebook seem to be pulling information from these pages to create their auto generated information and pages. Which as a municipal government is necessary to be correct.
If there is another way to do this that doesn't violate your policies I would be grateful if you would let me know. I have never used Wikipedia as an editor before yesterday when I used the account my boss set up, which was blocked for violating username policy and then the one I created for myself.(i.e this one)
Thank you in advance for any help you can give Gnaime (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello Kleuske. Yes, I work for Rittal but I don't see a COI because I just delivered a translation of ther German article which I didn't wrote in the first place. Unfortunately I forgot to mention that this is a translation. --Manuel Funk (talk) 13:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Manuel Funk: You working for Rittal and editing the article is the very definition of a conflict of interest. An undisclosed conflict of interest at that. Besides, you now admit paid editing. Please peruse WP:COI and Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure for details. Kleuske (talk) 13:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Kleuske. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Asexuality in Human sexual activity
Thanks - I've started a debate at Talk:Human sexual activity#Asexuality and copied your comment from my talk page there, I hope you don't mind. TSP (talk) 14:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Thedecentone (talk) 18:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@Thedecentone: Hi. I'm assuming you're referring to Jean Theslöf, but it would be appreciated you do not let me guess. I reverted since policy [1] requires contributions be sourced from reliable sources [2]. The fact that he is your paternal grandfather does not alter that. In fact, it suggests a conflict of interest and the appropriate guideline [3] strongly discourages editors to write about subjects they have close relations to. You are of course free to point out any shortcomings on the appropriate talk page. You are not free, however, to replace articles with unsourced family hagiographies.
Also I would strongly suggest you pose questions and remarks like this here, since more often than not, I ignore this sort of e-mails. It's not what my e-mail account is for. Regards, Kleuske (talk) 19:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Can you read?
The explanation was in the first revision.209.64.168.66 (talk) 19:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- @209.64.168.66: Your opinion does not equate a reliable source. The source cited is. besides, you seem to be editwarring. If you have a problem, gain consensus on the talk-page. Kleuske (talk) 19:55, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
One sports journalist's opinion is not a consensus. There shouldn't be need of any talk page discussion. I am removing an obvious attempt at inserting somebody's opinion into an article. This is pretty obvious. 209.64.168.66 (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- @209.64.168.66: I'll type slow, so you understand: Take... It... To... The... Bloody... Talk... Page. Thanks. ~Oh... And mind WP:3RR. Kleuske (talk) 20:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
This heading and content violate WP: No Personal Attacks Crawiki (talk) 12:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Jean Theslof Help and Advice
Cher Kleuske,
I love your sense of humour and appreciate how very patient you must be to do this all day (just from scrolling through your talks). As an information provider, I couldn't agree more about providing citations, which is why I included a seriously large section of them, to document each fact in the article.
My affiliate also has now sent me over 10 more online citations from valid news sources and historical organizations, which i would like to include when editing this article. However, I need your advice and you seem to be such an absolute pro, it would be a great kindness...since I am new to all of the technological requirements of posting to Wikipedia.
How can I edit this page and not have it taken down?
Kindest Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedecentone (talk • contribs) 20:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- You can't. You have an Conflict of Interest. You can suggest improvements on the talk-page, though. Kleuske (talk) 23:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Geological Society of America
Hi,
I can understand why you deleted some of the information I added in the last couple of weeks, but why did you revert the entire thing to before I edited it the first time? I think the info box was OK, and I got permission to use the photo of the solar panels, and I even added a reference to a print book. Those are all gone. Is there any way you can undo your edit and then give me the chance to go in and make things right (take out the "excessive" links to our website)? It would be more helpful for some comments on the rules rather than to lose all my work. Keagiles (talk) 23:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Keagiles
- Because the additions were promotional in tone and included excessive external links. Kleuske (talk) 12:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- OK. How does one add factual information to make the copy more accurate and robust without going over that line? Can I add the info box and complete the list of past presidents? Thanks. Kea Giles Keagiles (talk) 16:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
State collapse
Hi, on the 6th December you reduced this article from 40k bytes to 5k in 13 minutes, claiming Or and Synth throughout. Can you please be more specific? Thanks absolutely. Crawiki (talk) 12:52, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- It's a large collection of seemingly unrelated quote w/o any context, unrelated incidents and wild predictions. That's not an encyclopedic article on state collapse, that's an WP:ESSAY based on your POV. Kleuske (talk) 13:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-neutral editing: Wikipedia Standards Reminder
Kleuske: Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Further disruptive or non-constructive editing may be reported. Sturgeontransformer (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Sturgeontransformer: Please read Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars, remember that an admonishment is not an actual argument and respond to the points made on the talk page. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 19:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Removing large quantities of cited material without adequate rationale and posting strong language (including personal attacks) on edit histories and talk pages is not appropriate editing behavior, regardless of one's history as an editor. Disruptive editing does not require additional discussion, and continued disruptive editing may be reported. Sturgeontransformer (talk) 19:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Sturgeontransformer: Yeah... That's your sayso. I have not attacked anyone personally, I have criticized the text, which is a sham at this point. Please include a few actual arguments on the appropriate talk page and do not post here again if all you have are vapid accusations. Kleuske (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hey darling, apparently I'm now to inform you the whole thing was moved to WP:DRN. The admins seem in a bind on what to do exactly, but it's really not that complicated. Do come and state your mind, won't you dear? Thanks! François Robere (talk) 02:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)