Swatjester (talk | contribs) →rawr: new section |
Anythingyouwant (talk | contribs) →ArbCom Notification: emails |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Hi KillerChihuahua, I have filed an arbitration request pertaining to the indefinite ban on me that you proposed. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Ferrylodge Here] is the link.[[User:Ferrylodge|Ferrylodge]] 23:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC) |
Hi KillerChihuahua, I have filed an arbitration request pertaining to the indefinite ban on me that you proposed. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Ferrylodge Here] is the link.[[User:Ferrylodge|Ferrylodge]] 23:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
:May I have your permission to use the emails you sent me on September 14, at the arbitration?[[User:Ferrylodge|Ferrylodge]] 15:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Ferrylodge arbitration request == |
== Ferrylodge arbitration request == |
Revision as of 15:35, 19 October 2007
24 - 23 - 22 - 21 - 20 -19 - 18 -17 - 16 -15 - 14 -13 -12 -11 - 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 -4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Archives
Health updateAs so many have asked about my health, in email and on this page, and been so kind as to offer kind thoughts and prayers for my health, I feel obligated to post an update. For those for whom this is Too Much Personal Information, please just ignore this.
User:HaizumKC, can you have a look at a situation which developed overnight with the entries for Blackwater USA and Blackwater USA arms smuggling and User:Haizum a hostile and emotional guy with an extensive block log. In addition to his general uncivility, he keeps adding POV tags inappropriately. He has made no attempt to reach consensus with anyone about the articles. He's just very upset by them. --Pleasantville 10:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Deletion reviewYou recently commented on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychiatric abuse, which was closed as delete. The article has been nominated for a deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 October 5#Psychiatric abuse. Please feel free to comment on the decision there - as a contributor to the original AfD, your input would be welcomed. -- ChrisO 09:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Please commentYour input would be appreciated: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Martinphi ScienceApologist 21:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Recall questionHey, KC. I've seen this come up in numerous RfAs, and so I figured I'd ask you :) What are your thoughts on Category:Wikipedia administrators open to recall? I'm personally divided on the issue; I think it's fair to be desysopped if someone misuses admin tools, but I don't think I'd like to have a potential recall hanging over my head...hmm. Oh well, just looking for your thoughts, and happy editing, ( arky ) 03:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
← And,as a side note, what do you think about this? Cheers, ( arky ) 01:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC) ArbCom NotificationHi KillerChihuahua, I have filed an arbitration request pertaining to the indefinite ban on me that you proposed. Here is the link.Ferrylodge 23:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Ferrylodge arbitration requestIn the Ferrylodge arbitration case, you state that "Also typical is his initial naming of "Ferrylodge v. FeloniousMonk", indicating his mindset of Me. v Them." This connection between the naming and his motives does not follow, because the use of "v." was once the standard for two-person disputes that didn't have any other reasonable name (see Category:Wikipedia Arbitration cases). Only recently was this changed, to make case names sound less adversarial. So what you are attributing to his state of mind may very well just be left-over knowledge of the old case naming conventions. I'd like to request you remove this claim unless you can back it up, because users shouldn't be blamed for shifts in procedure they were unaware of. Picaroon (t) 01:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Mediation plzHi KC. Today, an editor named Equidistant put on the Conservapedia entry some related articles he thought were appropiate. They were deleted by other users, so Equidistant opened a discussion on the talk page. Only user Hut 8.5 replied. I supported Edquidistant. Given that nobody said nothing else, I thought it was fine to make the edit again, but user Fredrick day reverted it. Anyway, an admin named Bbatsell intervened and deleted the "See also" section completely, arguing no relation to Conservapedia, as per WP:SEEALSO. Please, help. Dukered 01:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge/Workshop. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 16:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC) Anthony ChidiacHi KC, hope you are well. Listen, I posted up a complete re-write and stub for chidiac, and did a big oopsy and put it back up into namespace. It got G4'd quicker than you could say G. I have the stub in my discussion page, can you help with it? Its notable, short, and not a train wreck anymore. all the best! T --T3Smile 18:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC) rawrI'm pretty sure it's been ages since we've run into each other on Wikipedia or IRC. How are you? I'm stressed to the gills with law school, but I'm flying down to Florida tomorrow for the weekend, I can't wait to get a taste of home.⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 02:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC) |