→February 2014: re |
|||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
:::I think we need someone to mediate.—[[User:Khabboos|Khabboos]] ([[User talk:Khabboos#top|talk]]) 17:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
:::I think we need someone to mediate.—[[User:Khabboos|Khabboos]] ([[User talk:Khabboos#top|talk]]) 17:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
::::Mediate what? I have given you 3 legitimate reasons. Why are you continuing? [[User:AcidSnow|AcidSnow]] ([[User talk:AcidSnow|talk]]) 17:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
::::Mediate what? I have given you 3 legitimate reasons. Why are you continuing? [[User:AcidSnow|AcidSnow]] ([[User talk:AcidSnow|talk]]) 17:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
* When a content dispute arises you have to stop the edit war and need to take it to the talk page. If after discussion among the two sides at the talk page they are unable to resolve the dispute then there are multiple ways forward (''See'' [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]]). So if you have tried one way go to the next step of dispute resolution. Also remember even if you think you are right about something or your edit is justifiable in a content dispute, it does not allow you to continue the edit war. And both of you might also like to know that [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] has allowed administrators to impose [[WP:AC/DS|Discretionary Sanctions]] on editors if they find their actions disruptive in the India-Pakistan topic area. -- [[User:Smsarmad|<span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span><span style="background:white;color:DodgerBlue">'''M'''</span><span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Smsarmad|Talk]]</sup> 17:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:55, 2 February 2014
Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Khabboos! Thank you for your contributions. I am Writers Bond and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Writers Bond (talk) 16:25, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
You have constantly and purposely violated and attempted to violate Wikipedias neutral point of view and rule on editing on several pages (Talk:Karachi, Talk:Sindhi people, Jayapala, and Hindu Kush). You have already been warned by other editors that this is not allowed. Following your recent edits on the Hindu Kush with your deliberate disruptive editing of a quote in a attempt to push your "agenda" I have personally come to inform you that you are severely risking being banned. AcidSnow (talk) 22:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Khabboos, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Khabboos! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Hindu Kush. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Did you read the edit I made at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_kush#Origin_of_name? What is wrong with it? The term Hindu Kush comes from the words Hindu and Kush, so we have to either replace Indians with Hindu or put the few words that I added at the end of that particular senence. If one reads the next sentence, it clearly mentions Hindu Kush='Killer of Hindus', so why is what I add unacceptable?—Khabboos (talk) 16:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by LukeSurl t c 16:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC). (You can at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Administrators' noticeboard
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AcidSnow (talk) 22:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- If you wish to participate or watch the discussion, you can find it at WP:ANI#User:Khabboos. AcidSnow accidentally started the discussion on the wrong page, so I've moved it. Nyttend (talk) 00:34, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Hinduism in Pakistan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS Talk 16:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- In the article on Hinduism in Pakistan, I wrote that a mob ransacked a temple at Nowshera in 2005, with this as a reference - '"Mob ransacks temple in Nowshera". http://www.dawn.com/news/145745/mob-ransacks-temple-in-nowshera. DAWN MEDIA GROUP. June 30, 2005. Retrieved 31 January 2014.', which said the same thing, but AcidSnow is continuously removing it, so please tell me what to do.—Khabboos (talk) 16:57, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- I have told you several times already POV is not allowed here. You also keep under representing the links you have given. "to avenge an alleged desecration of Holy Quran by a man here", this is not a hate crime so please stop adding it you are wasting my time and others. AcidSnow (talk) 17:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- When a content dispute arises you have to stop the edit war and need to take it to the talk page. If after discussion among the two sides at the talk page they are unable to resolve the dispute then there are multiple ways forward (See Wikipedia:Dispute resolution). So if you have tried one way go to the next step of dispute resolution. Also remember even if you think you are right about something or your edit is justifiable in a content dispute, it does not allow you to continue the edit war. And both of you might also like to know that Arbitration Committee has allowed administrators to impose Discretionary Sanctions on editors if they find their actions disruptive in the India-Pakistan topic area. -- SMS Talk 17:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC)