m Talkback (Wikipedia:Help desk#"blame" command for Wikipedia) (TW) |
→Warning: new section |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
{{talkback|Wikipedia:Help desk|"blame" command for Wikipedia|ts=06:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)}} |
{{talkback|Wikipedia:Help desk|"blame" command for Wikipedia|ts=06:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)}} |
||
<span style="font-family:monospace;">[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</span>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 06:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC) |
<span style="font-family:monospace;">[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</span>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 06:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Warning == |
|||
Despite being properly sourced, your repeated addition of cn tag and removal of sourced material is [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]]. According to [http://www.webcitation.org/663OeHZUG this], ''"Surveys indicate that 90 per cent of North American men and 65 per cent of women masturbate, Queen notes"''. The google book reference can be found [[Wikipedia:RX#Archived_newspaper_articles|here]]. If you continue this disruptive behavior by disruptively adding cn tag and removing sourced material, you will be reported. --[[User:SupernovaExplosion|'''<span style="color: maroon;">Supernova</span><span style="color: DarkGreen;">Explosion</span>''']] [[User talk: SupernovaExplosion|'''<span style="color: blue;"> <sup>Talk</sup></span>''']] 13:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:10, 21 March 2012
Archived discussions
Archive | Start | End |
Archive 1 | 2012-02-01 | 2012-02-15 |
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Sonezaki Shinju (1978 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Ribbon Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Cinema of Japan
I have tried rewriting the paragraph. Let me know if you still find it confusing. If I may say so, however, I found your tone of your last comment unproductive. This is a community, where a cooperative atmosphere is essential. If my statement that you seemed to misunderstand the paragraph offended you, I apologize. But I might add that comments like yours should at best be said on individual talk pages, which is why I am writing on yours. Also, if you had a problem with my reversions of your changes, referring them to me first is much more productive that writing on the article talk page. Michitaro (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but I'm not really following where this discussion is meant to lead to. I spent quite a long time writing and rewriting that comment on the talk page to make it understandable why I thought there was a problem with the paragraph, but it didn't seem to help you to see my point of view. I don't know what else to write there which would make it any clearer or convince you, so if you're not convinced by what I wrote then it's better to drop the discussion and leave the paragraph as it is. JoshuSasori (talk) 15:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
How we can not know this
I didn't know it.
Well of course what you wrote was shorthand for Everyone who's taken the trouble to read anything about YM knows this. And since I'm editing the article, it's reasonable to assume that this "everyone" includes me.
But it doesn't, because I haven't read up on YM, in whom I'm not much interested. All I'm doing is tidying up the article, because the little I know about YM is enough to tell me that she merits an article that isn't a mess. (True, no article should be a mess. OK then: She has such a degree of popularity that the article on her is likely to be much consulted, and its messiness particularly unfortunate.)
Anyway, unless I cite some source, you can assume that I'm editing out of complete ignorance. If I seem to be making some mistake, chances are that I'm making some mistake. (Don't say I didn't warn you!)
I note that your (slightly irritated?) edit comment accompanied your addition of a source, so NB I'm not complaining. Quite the contrary, you're doing good work. Keep it up!
Pop singers aside, I must compliment you on your good (or good bad) taste in films, as shown by your username. -- Hoary (talk) 01:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- It's just a joke. Momoe despite being a gigantic star in Japan is almost unknown to English speakers, which is a sad reflection on something or other. JoshuSasori (talk) 01:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Well, she was a star on the strength of her looks, movies, TV series and music. Japanese TV dramas were rarely exported at the time, I don't think any Japanese starlet has succeeded in the west on her looks, and back then English speakers had different tastes in movies and music. I'm not sure that even now they'd be much interested. But I don't suppose they'd be less interested in her than in whoever were the gigantic Hong Kong, Indonesian, Argentinian or Soviet stars of the early 70s. -- Hoary (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- People who don't speak Japanese are unlikely to notice Momoe's power of expression as a singer. JoshuSasori (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Well, she was a star on the strength of her looks, movies, TV series and music. Japanese TV dramas were rarely exported at the time, I don't think any Japanese starlet has succeeded in the west on her looks, and back then English speakers had different tastes in movies and music. I'm not sure that even now they'd be much interested. But I don't suppose they'd be less interested in her than in whoever were the gigantic Hong Kong, Indonesian, Argentinian or Soviet stars of the early 70s. -- Hoary (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Ten Dark Women, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. When you recently edited Risa Yoshiki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Funabashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 06:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dismas|(talk) 06:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Warning
Despite being properly sourced, your repeated addition of cn tag and removal of sourced material is disruptive editing. According to this, "Surveys indicate that 90 per cent of North American men and 65 per cent of women masturbate, Queen notes". The google book reference can be found here. If you continue this disruptive behavior by disruptively adding cn tag and removing sourced material, you will be reported. --SupernovaExplosion Talk 13:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)