Content deleted Content added
So why does that mean his entire talk page gets blanked?! |
m Reverted edits by Wknight94 (talk) to last version by Splash |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This user is a sockpuppet as described on the user page. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] - [[User talk:Splash|tk]] 19:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
'''Welcome!''' |
|||
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome]] to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]] |
|||
*[[Help:Contents|Help pages]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Tutorial|Tutorial]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Article development|How to write a great article]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] |
|||
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Please [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 15:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Speedy retagging== |
|||
Regarding [[Don Bell (reporter)]], I previously removed a speedy deletion tag you added but you re-added so I re-removed. That article just survived an AFD so it is not a candidate for speedy deletion. Please stop re-adding the speedy tag. Thanks. —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 15:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I think the [[Don Bell (reporter)]] should be deleted. Did I do something wrong? It also seems to be a reason [[User:CFIF]] says I am a sockpuppet of [[User:Spotteddogsdotorg]], something it looks like he does when people do not agree with him. I made a request on the [[Wikipedia:Requests for investigation]] page that he gets looked at. Can you advise me further? [[User:José is Fluid|José is Fluid]] 16:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::That article has already been nominated for non-speedy deletion and it survived. If it is not a candidate for ''non-speedy'' deletion, it certainly isn't a candidate for ''speedy'' deletion. That's an honest mistake. The problem is that I removed the speedy tag yesterday with an edit summary and you re-added the tag today. Once an admin removes a speedy deletion tag, you're not supposed to re-add it. Bring it to [[WP:PROD]] or [[WP:AFD]] if you want but I already said that it's not a candidate for [[WP:CSD]]. As far as the sockpuppet accusations, I don't know anything about that. —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 16:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::I now have the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Bell (reporter)]] page. I think I must have misread the deletion thing before. Thank you for your help. [[User:José is Fluid|José is Fluid]] 16:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::::Not a problem. Speedy deletion can be a little dangerous if administrators get careless and don't look into the history of an article before hitting the deletion button. I've had to save a couple articles recently that were speedy deleted by admins who didn't notice that the article had been badly vandalized first. Vandals using speedy delete is very bad because it's hard to track down what they've had deleted. Sorry if I'm a little touchy about it! :) —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 16:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:CFIF]] == |
|||
Hey, thanks for helping me combat CFIF's recklessness in labeling others sockpuppets. It's comforting to know I'm not the only one being targeted. [[User:JianLi|JianLi]] 17:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC) |