Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Jax 0677/Archive 21) (bot |
TenPoundHammer (talk | contribs) →State I'm In (album) : new section |
||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
** Thanks for the whisper back! I was trying to see if there were guidelines on that at [[Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates]] but I'm having trouble locating them... [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 00:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC) |
** Thanks for the whisper back! I was trying to see if there were guidelines on that at [[Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates]] but I'm having trouble locating them... [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 00:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
::*''' Reply '''- {{yo|WhisperToMe}}, [[WP:CAT#T]]. --[[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677#top|talk]]) 19:59, 21 April 2019 (UTC) |
::*''' Reply '''- {{yo|WhisperToMe}}, [[WP:CAT#T]]. --[[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677#top|talk]]) 19:59, 21 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
== [[State I'm In (album) ]] == |
|||
What part of "the label does NOT need a citation" do you not understand? The label ''never'' needs a citation, since the album itself is always understood the source of that information. (For instance, ''[[Dookie]]'' is a featured article, and the infobox does ''not'' have a citation for the label.) I know this is at least the fifth or sixth goddamn time I've told you this. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 04:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:55, 25 April 2019
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Country music songs
If you see a country music song that you don't think is notable, would you be willing to send it my way? I speak specifically of Talk You Out of It and Night Shift (Jon Pardi song), both of which I was able to expand after seeing you'd tagged them. This is a topic of interest to me, so please feel free to ping or message me when you see a country music article that needs work. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 16:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, I will try to do that, if I remember. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:52, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, also, if "Bubalu" can not be expanded beyond a stub, it should be merged per WP:NSONG. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Lisa Lynn Masters
Thank you for creating Lisa's page. Thank you so much!
William
WilliamBenBrooks@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.17.46.79 (talk) 16:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Janice Griffith listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Janice Griffith. Since you had some involvement with the Janice Griffith redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 24.185.5.61 (talk) 05:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop undoing edits without any justification and without doing any research
Please be bold and verify any facts you believe to be untrue by checking Google yourself before just hitting "undo" on edits without providing any justification whatsoever. I even did all the work for you and provided you with multiple references already: [1][2][3][4][5][6] --Nicholas0 (talk) 22:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Nicholas0:, @Ponyo:, a navigation box is designed to list existing articles only, not to list every album that an artist has released, nor every subject associated with the title of the navbox, which is the purpose that an infobox would serve. Bold, revert, discuss is a policy stating that while editors should be bold,
- Also, please link to the page in question when leaving a message on the talk page of another user. While it is OK to list the album with references on the article page, it should not be added to the navbox until an article exists. The exception to this is a navigation box for a musical ensemble with two or more members. For a navigation box for a musical ensemble with two or more members, listing only the members with articles might falsely lead people to believe that the ensemble is a solo act. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://cleorecs.com/store/shop/skold-never-is-now-limited-edition-clear-vinyl/
- ^ https://skold.bandcamp.com/album/never-is-now
- ^ http://www.sonic-seducer.de/index.php/de/6074-never-is-now-ehemaliges-marilyn-manson-mitglied-tim-skold-veroeffentlicht-sein-zweites-album.html
- ^ https://www.volt-magazin.de/index.php/home/release-preview-ebm-electro-industrial-post-punk-cold-wave/439-skold-never-is-now-album-info-cover-voe-termin-vorbestellung
- ^ http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/former-marilyn-manson-multi-instrumentalist-tim-skold-returns-with-new-skold-album-never-is-now/
- ^ http://www.altrevolt.com/tim-skold-announces-new-album-never-is-now/
--Jax 0677 (talk) 13:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
That is not an actual rule. It is merely a suggestion. Please refer to the instructions in WP:NAVBOX:
"Each link should clearly be identifiable as such to our readers. In general, text colors should be consistent with Wikipedia text color defaults, so links should be blue; dead links should be red; and red and blue should not be used for other (non-link) text."
The fact that it states that dead links should be listed in red clearly indicates that items for which there is no article can be included in navboxes. That is how the links would be red. It is therefore readily apparent that navboxes also include items for which there is no article. I don't know where you pulled your invented rule from, but you did not quote anything proving that it is actually a rule. You just invented it and now you want to force everyone else to abide by your own personal preference. That is non-collaborative and your failure to provide any explanation makes your constant unjustified "undoing" resemble edit warring. I have not accused you of it, but providing an edit summary would prevent users from getting such an impression from you.
The only requirement regarding such templates is this: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template." I does not state that there must be an article for each item in the navbox, but rather only the subject of the template. This is yet another form of proof that navboxes also include items for which there are no pages, though this should already be readily apparent from the multitude of navboxes including items without pages.
This item is very likely to be developed into an article, which justifies its inclusion: "Red links and redirects should normally be avoided unless they are very likely to be developed into articles." I did not include a red link, since that is to be avoided (although it could technically be included), but rather included the information in the correct way using black text to indicate that there is not yet any page for it. That is the best balance. There are articles for all of his other albums so it can be assumed that an article will be created for this one as well. You could be bold and make such a page if you have such a problem with black text in the navbox, but you cannot just make up a rule and then enforce it without ever telling anyone what you are doing, without giving any justification, and without leaving any edit summary. Leaving an edit summary is a very basic concept of Wikipedia. If you need help, please refer to Help:Edit summary.
Nicholas0 (talk) 13:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Nicholas0:, if you read the edit summaries carefully, you will see that links to WP:WTAF and WP:BRD were included. WP:WTAF indicates that the album added did not have an article, and WP:BRD indicates that because there was a reversion due to objection to adding the album, that adding the album needs to be discussed. Also, on a talk page, please format the web pages as URLs and not references with reference tags.
- @Ponyo:, thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I have no specific input with regard to the content dispute itself; my message to Nicholas0 was directly related to concerns regarding their ability to edit collaboratively. I would have responded on their talk page, but no one should be expected to read through a wall of text such as this (which is moot given that they blanked the whole conversation before I could respond) all of which just reinforces my concerns regarding civility and collaboration. It looked like some headway was being made above, but this edit summary doesn't give me much hope. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for using {{blp sources}} instead of {{refimprove}} on a biographical article. Remember that this also applies to actively touring duos/groups/bands. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
"Dirty World Entertainment Recordings LLC" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Dirty World Entertainment Recordings LLC". Since you had some involvement with the "Dirty World Entertainment Recordings LLC" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Janice Griffith
Hello, Jax 0677,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Akhiljaxxn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Janice Griffith for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a consensus decision to be unsuitable for inclusion.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Akhiljaxxn}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Akhiljaxxn:, the article was very recently voted keep here. I have notified the deleting administrator. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of 2019 United States Border closure for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 United States Border closure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 United States Border closure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 14:14, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I'm a bit confused about this revert here. Doesn't the navigational template on HPD belong in the category about HPD?
Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @WhisperToMe:, I have been told that the only categories in a navbox should be template categories. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the whisper back! I was trying to see if there were guidelines on that at Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates but I'm having trouble locating them... WhisperToMe (talk) 00:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @WhisperToMe:, WP:CAT#T. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:59, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
What part of "the label does NOT need a citation" do you not understand? The label never needs a citation, since the album itself is always understood the source of that information. (For instance, Dookie is a featured article, and the infobox does not have a citation for the label.) I know this is at least the fifth or sixth goddamn time I've told you this. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC)