Jake Fuersturm (talk | contribs) added auto archiving notice |
→Suggestion: new section |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Possibly unfree File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg == |
== Possibly unfree File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg == |
||
A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 May 29#File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> --[[User:Lankiveil|Lankiveil]] <sup>([[User talk:Lankiveil|speak to me]])</sup> 07:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 May 29#File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> --[[User:Lankiveil|Lankiveil]] <sup>([[User talk:Lankiveil|speak to me]])</sup> 07:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Suggestion == |
|||
I suggest you familiarize yourself with [[WP:POINT]]. Filing bogus 3RRs and other general off-topic barbs is not productive to consensus building and it does not demonstrate your [[WP:AGF|assumption of good faith]]. You have pointed out several times that I (and others) have not edited [[Spock]] in quite a while, but that should not prevent anyone from being a part of the article ''now''. I do not [[WP:OWN]] the article any more than you do. |
|||
Despite your clear lack of good faith on my part, the pointiness you've demonstrated by filing a bogus 3RR, and borderline ownership issues with the article (repeated over the timing of other editors involvement in ''your'' article) I'm going to offer you some [[WP:TEA]]. Thank you for your contributions to this and other articles. I'm sure we will reach some sort of understanding that doesn't require general uncivil behavior. I look forward to your involvement and that of other editors. [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 13:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:34, 29 May 2011
Going inactive. I've spent far too much time here over the past while, and the process has become, quite simply, frustrating. Therefore I've decided to take a break from Wikipedia. I may pop up on occasion for a visit. Take care! (If you need to get hold of me for some reason, just send me an email). -- Jake Fuersturm
Ack, sorry, my mistake on the second point, you're quite right. With that said, it's not in my opinion clearly meeting the NFCC either. I'd be happy to restore it and list it at XFD so that we can get a firm decision one way or the other, if you're agreeable to that. Again, sorry for getting the deletion wrong. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:05, 29 May 2011 (UTC).
- Not to mention that Spock is very much "alive"! :)
- That's cool - I'd appreciate it going through whatever channels/processes it would have normally been subjected to - there was actually a fairly lengthy discussion in progress on the file's talk page, but seeing as how the only two participants were the uploader (i.e. me) and the deletion nominator, I'm thinking we probably need some third parties involved to get a proper consensus going.
- Thanks! -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Suggestion
I suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:POINT. Filing bogus 3RRs and other general off-topic barbs is not productive to consensus building and it does not demonstrate your assumption of good faith. You have pointed out several times that I (and others) have not edited Spock in quite a while, but that should not prevent anyone from being a part of the article now. I do not WP:OWN the article any more than you do.
Despite your clear lack of good faith on my part, the pointiness you've demonstrated by filing a bogus 3RR, and borderline ownership issues with the article (repeated over the timing of other editors involvement in your article) I'm going to offer you some WP:TEA. Thank you for your contributions to this and other articles. I'm sure we will reach some sort of understanding that doesn't require general uncivil behavior. I look forward to your involvement and that of other editors. Erikeltic (Talk) 13:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)