Lionmadness (talk | contribs) |
AtlanticDeep (talk | contribs) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 299: | Line 299: | ||
Ironholds, just because the heat turns up in places like Afd, doesn't mean that you need to lose your cool with other editors. How about take a short break, go for a walk or something, to calm down. You tell AD to keep within policies and guidelines, well [[WP:AGF]] ''is'' a policy and [[WP:CIVIL]] ''is'' a guideline. Please reinforce those.--[[User:Lionmadness|Lionmadness]] ([[User talk:Lionmadness|talk]]) 02:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC) |
Ironholds, just because the heat turns up in places like Afd, doesn't mean that you need to lose your cool with other editors. How about take a short break, go for a walk or something, to calm down. You tell AD to keep within policies and guidelines, well [[WP:AGF]] ''is'' a policy and [[WP:CIVIL]] ''is'' a guideline. Please reinforce those.--[[User:Lionmadness|Lionmadness]] ([[User talk:Lionmadness|talk]]) 02:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
We know each other off-wiki, and watch each other's edits, but keep that quiet! :)--[[User:Lionmadness|Lionmadness]] ([[User talk:Lionmadness|talk]]) 02:30, 27 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Oh no, I am not his meatpuppet, in fact, I think I joined a whole month before he did.--[[User:Lionmadness|Lionmadness]] ([[User talk:Lionmadness|talk]]) 02:32, 27 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:We were about the same time. 11 months ago.--[[User:AtlanticDeep|AtlanticDeep]] ([[User talk:AtlanticDeep|talk]]) 02:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:35, 27 December 2009
RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DreamRimmer | 34 | 24 | 5 | 59 | Open | 10:02, 4 June 2024 | 4 days, 14 hours | no | report |
Inner Temple
Unrecognisably fantastic! Very nice work. Will gladly help out when I can, although real-life a bit hectic at present. Yours, BencherliteTalk 13:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- It has its moments... No chance of me attending meetups, alas, since User:WifeofBencherlite and User:BabyBencherlite demand attention at weekends, and "Wikipedia meetups" would not be a phrase to assist domestic harmony! BencherliteTalk 17:30, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, the correct answer is "Merge with Middle Temple Library" and save lots on the running costs... BencherliteTalk 20:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- I know; it's on the agenda for various committees in the next few weeks! BencherliteTalk 20:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, the correct answer is "Merge with Middle Temple Library" and save lots on the running costs... BencherliteTalk 20:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Slightly off-topic, but this talk might interest you. BencherliteTalk 15:05, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Don't rush on my account, I won't be back in the Temple until Wednesday. BencherliteTalk 00:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
More old TV schedules for Brisbane
You had nominated 1959 Brisbane network television schedule (weekday) for delete, along with 1985 Brisbane network television schedule (weekday). Since then I have added 3 more to the list. If you would like to comment on them, here are the links. Articles for deletion - 1992 Brisbane, 1974 Brisbane and State-by-State Australian Daytime TV schedules. Later, I guess we can delete that template included in these pages as well. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 16:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of AB/CD
A tag has been placed on AB/CD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's not a blatant copyright! I have translated this from Italian wikipedia ([1]). Elfast (talk) 18:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Megarex
Hi, Ironholds! I saw you nominated Megarex for deletion. In fact, it had no references. I added some references I found about this band and its importance to Brazilian music and, then, I explained the reasons to keep the article in Wikipedia, according to band. Take a look, please. Thank you!Victor Silveira (talk) 02:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Rohan Smith
One added prior to your message, and more to follow.Lando09 (talk) 19:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Hüseyin Demiral
No big loss if Hüseyin Demiral goes away and comes back as a decent write-up, but PROD is probably the way to go. I considered an outright non-admin decline but given your considerable experience and the fact that it's no big loss I didn't change it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 21:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, my first language is swedish and Ive written some 100+ articles there, mostly on economics and green topics. But I have tried to contribute a little to english wp also. In this case I think it is pretty obvious that the article should not be deleted. It is obvious that the case is unic and the original documents are even there, so everyone can check it all quite easily. What on earth could justify a deletion then, just wondering.--Mats33 (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I suggested an alt hook for your dyk Trustee Investments Act 1961, as the first one was 215 characters and therefore over the accepted limit. Please check for accuracy! Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 16:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Your flag for 2010...
Hi there, Ironholds. I noticed that on the WikiCup signup sheet, you chose . However, has already been taken, so please choose another flag. If you have any questions, tell them on my talkpage. Secret Saturdays (talk to me) 00:00, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Apparently, you added yourself twice, and the one who already took it is you. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:38, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Inner Temple
Orlady (talk) 02:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Trustee Investments Act 1961
SoWhy 21:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Trustee Act 2000
Hello! Your submission of Trustee Act 2000 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Calmer Waters 17:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Trustee Act 2000
⇌ Jake Wartenberg 16:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation!
To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup.
It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:
- Mainspace and/or portal edits will not be awarded points at all.
- Did you know? articles (which were worth 5 points last year) will now be worth 10 points.
- Good articles (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
- Valued pictures will be now awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
- Featured lists (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
- Featured portals (which were worth 25 points last year) will now be worth 35 points.
- Featured articles (which were worth 50 points last year) will now be worth 100 points.
- Featured topics (which were worth 10 points per article last year) will now be worth 15 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
- Good topics (which were worth 5 points per article last year) will now be worth 10 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
- In the news will still be awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges, iMatthew talk at 03:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Some questions have arisen regarding your dyk for dyk for Arthur Lee Dixon. Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 01:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Occupiers' Liability Act 1957
Materialscientist (talk) 18:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Seert (Chaldean Diocese)
Thanks for this excellent article ;). In future, could you use inline citations? Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 19:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- I intend to eventually. See, for example, my article Dioceses of the Church of the East to 1318. I just haven't got round to adding inline citations yet to the Seert article. I've created about twenty new articles on the Church of the East in the past couple of months, and my priority has been to get the stuff on Wikipedia first and bolster it with citations later. As you have probably guessed, I put in a single inline citation in the Seert article just to stop it from being plastered with tags.
- I'm an academic editor by trade, and fully agree that Wikipedia articles should be properly sourced. Give me a bit of time and I'll sort the Seert article out.
I've replied on my talk page.HeartofaDog (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Inner Temple (2)
OK, I've gone and bought the "Community of Communities" book from the Treasury Office. Are there particular bits and pieces you're after in the other works, or shall I just see what I can find? BencherliteTalk 15:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Defective Premises Act 1972
⇌ Jake Wartenberg 10:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
University of Sussex - Notable faculty
Thanks for helping to edit The University of Sussex page, i think it needs quite a lot of work but i'm not quite sure how to get it up to a decent standard.
I reverted your adding of Colin Eaborn though, because i dont see why he should be added as an example when there are no other examples? Why is he especially notable? Maybe there needs to be a list of notable faculty?
I'd appreciate your thoughts on it. --Allie Cabab (talk) 16:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Occupiers' Liability Act 1984
Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
You must be kidding. Bearian (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Arthur Lee Dixon
⇌ Jake Wartenberg 18:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLP bot
Hey there
I wanted your input on a bot that you requested (and i scripted) see the discussion here Tim1357 (talk) 18:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Yo ho ho
PS sorry I missed the Oak, hope to be there in Jan. ϢereSpielChequers 20:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Colin Eaborn
Materialscientist (talk) 11:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for George Martin Lees
Materialscientist (talk) 03:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Childrens Cupcakes
Hi, the photo is mine. Are you able to please explain to me in simple language how to indicate this? I studied and studied the instructions but clearly don't have it right... Many thanks!!!
Zadokco (talk) 13:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
I have a scathing review for you to proof
It's on my fake major and the corresponding "professor". Find me on IRC. Lara ☁ 17:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
hi, i create this article as summary of subdivisions of the province cited in wikipedia, i am interested in made citations, extend the article an made more interested. i just do no not where start . can you give me a suggestion or examples? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liz de Quebec (talk • contribs) 00:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Flippa
I'd created this article Flippa in good faith after watching outdated information at Sitepoint and updated it. I wonder if Sitepoint passes the criteria of WP:GNG and should also be tagged for deletion. The Sitepoint blog was the only official statement (more like an official press release) so I included it with other verifiable references, and most of them are WP:RS. Thank you very much for your time. --Scieberking (talk) 20:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Ulka
Hello Ironholds, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Ulka - a page you tagged - because: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. JohnCD (talk) 21:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Only one sentence of the article is actually a direct copy, and I would think that's acceptable - if not, that sentence could be recast. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion Coaxpress:
Hello Ironholds, I am just asking why Coaxpress is deleted as G11. It is not an advertising or promotion of one company or product. It is a standard like USB or fireWire and propably the successor of Cameralink (Several Cameralink standardisation companies are now active in the CoaXPress standardisation). xmaillard (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:03, 21 December 2009 (UTC).
Vikingvin
Maybe you know WHAT is radio WFMU???? :))) WFMU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.103.233.222 (talk) 18:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Re: Speedy deletion of Bumbaclot
Please see WP:Soft redirect. That's uncontroversially an okay article, but still, to follow Wiki rules, I won't remove it. GSMR (talk) 21:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
Re: things
Took a fairly long break from much computer stuff this term.. (Too much partying) .. so I decided I should probably get back to learning law and writing about it. The duty of care article is very nearly done, and pretty comprehensive I think. The vicarious liability needs some improvements probably, but it's good I think. What're you learning this year? RichsLaw (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- UCTA is a good shout. Do you mind if I help out a little? After that we could tidy vicarious liability/add a few little things and get it reviewed, as well as duty of care (the whole of negligence is a mess). RichsLaw (talk) 19:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Enjoy the season!
Re: UCTA FA
I look forward to collaborating with you on the GA/FA drive for the UCTA article. But I won't be able to even consider getting around to working on it until the beginning of the new year. Would that accord with your plans for the article, or will my tardiness prove problematic? Best, AGK 02:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Jatra Shuru
Hello Ironholds, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Jatra Shuru - a page you tagged - because: Article is about an album by Bhoomi. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:01, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Notification: Proposed 'Motion to Close' at Wikipedia:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote. You have previously commented at Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator/Admin Recall. Best Wishes for the Holidays, Jusdafax 06:13, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
aha
But of course... Shimgray | talk | 16:39, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- It is... complicated. It was originally the "Avoidance of Liability (England and Wales) Bill" (second reading, 28-1-77), name changed sometime in April/May. First Lords reading (?) 10-5-77; second Lords 23-5-77; I'm having some trouble pinning down the rest of it. This (6-5-77) is a debate on amendments, but Commons first/second reading proper is a bit hard to find. Shimgray | talk | 17:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Re: AFC Youth Championship 1988 qualification
Done. Thanks for the reminder. --Al1976 (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
You shoot that dog!
It's an expression that is hard to explain but is like saying that common sense should be applied.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 02:06, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
I've undone the edit you made to my talk page. I was trying to be polite in the comment above try to explaining you the phrase. The saying is in line with policy, as I admitted it is hard to explain the saying's true meaning. Either way, you didn't have to snap at me like that >:(--AtlanticDeep (talk) 02:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Ironholds, just because the heat turns up in places like Afd, doesn't mean that you need to lose your cool with other editors. How about take a short break, go for a walk or something, to calm down. You tell AD to keep within policies and guidelines, well WP:AGF is a policy and WP:CIVIL is a guideline. Please reinforce those.--Lionmadness (talk) 02:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
We know each other off-wiki, and watch each other's edits, but keep that quiet! :)--Lionmadness (talk) 02:30, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh no, I am not his meatpuppet, in fact, I think I joined a whole month before he did.--Lionmadness (talk) 02:32, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- We were about the same time. 11 months ago.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 02:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC)