concept name and future help offered |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I've renamed it "Encleation (concept)" . This is actually describes more of what you wrote rather than surgical technique. With this, the page does not have to be a disambiguation page. There can be sections for leiyomyoma, pathology, etc. Good luck on writing it. If you need help, I am willing to help. [[User:Chergles|Chergles]] ([[User talk:Chergles|talk]]) 23:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC) |
I've renamed it "Encleation (concept)" . This is actually describes more of what you wrote rather than surgical technique. With this, the page does not have to be a disambiguation page. There can be sections for leiyomyoma, pathology, etc. Good luck on writing it. If you need help, I am willing to help. [[User:Chergles|Chergles]] ([[User talk:Chergles|talk]]) 23:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
==comment on your comment== |
|||
I'm not sure where Chergles is getting people cutting out their own eyes stuff. That's bizarre. --InsufficientData (talk) 00:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Bizarre is correct. See http://www.nature.com/eye/journal/v18/n4/full/6700667a.html and http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28582204/ . First link is entitled "Bilateral self-enucleation of eyes" describing an event in the UK. Second link is entitled "Death row inmate pulls out eye, says he ate it; He had earlier pulled out other eye after conviction in family's killings" and happened in Texas. Chergles (talk) 00:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Really, it feels to me that you're not really getting what I'm saying, since you don't reply to specific parts of my messages. Are you actually reading my replies in their entirety? This is frustrating to me. I feel like either I'm not expressing myself very well, or you're just not understanding what I'm saying. |
|||
--InsufficientData (talk) 00:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chergles" |
|||
Sorry, not trying to argue or be difficult. Will clarify anything you wish. Specific part that I didn't answer. In short, I'm very uncomfortable with enucleation (surgical technique). I'll think of an alternate name that is mutually acceptable. [[User:Chergles|Chergles]] ([[User talk:Chergles|talk]]) 01:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:01, 8 February 2009
Test Message
Leaving a message for myself. Hello you. InsufficientData (talk) 13:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Nice little article. :-) I see you've been editing a lot of articles related to dentistry. You a dentist? Nephron T|C 12:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you :) I'm actually an engineer, but I've been doing quite a bit of research into oral pathology and treatments after my own recent diagnosis with ameloblastoma. I figure that if I'm going to make the effort to research these things, I might as well share what I've learned with others. --InsufficientData (talk) 17:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
enucleation page
I saw your new article when patrolling pages. I've marked it as patrolled.
Consider stopping work on this article. It could be a disambiguation page. Chergles (talk) 18:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia should not give instructions on how to do surgery, just as Wikipedia should not give bomb making instructions or how to kill someone with an axe. Therefore, enucleation (surgical technique) is an inappropriate title because it could lead to article creep and eventually tell people, including insane people, how to remove their eye.
This should be a disambiguation page. It could direct people to the different articles, some of which are red linked. I will show you what I mean. When I do so, it is not an edit war. It's just that seeing it is easier than a long, long description (and so far there are not other editors - if there were 50 editors then it would be unwieldy to demonstrate like I will be doing). Thank you for your patience. Chergles (talk) 20:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
How about renaming it? You may have no intention of teaching people how to remove eyes but the title of "surgical technique" is highly suggestive of this. Since you don't seem to want the article as a disambiguation, I will restore your text with some modification. Chergles (talk) 23:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I've renamed it "Encleation (concept)" . This is actually describes more of what you wrote rather than surgical technique. With this, the page does not have to be a disambiguation page. There can be sections for leiyomyoma, pathology, etc. Good luck on writing it. If you need help, I am willing to help. Chergles (talk) 23:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
comment on your comment
I'm not sure where Chergles is getting people cutting out their own eyes stuff. That's bizarre. --InsufficientData (talk) 00:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Bizarre is correct. See http://www.nature.com/eye/journal/v18/n4/full/6700667a.html and http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28582204/ . First link is entitled "Bilateral self-enucleation of eyes" describing an event in the UK. Second link is entitled "Death row inmate pulls out eye, says he ate it; He had earlier pulled out other eye after conviction in family's killings" and happened in Texas. Chergles (talk) 00:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Really, it feels to me that you're not really getting what I'm saying, since you don't reply to specific parts of my messages. Are you actually reading my replies in their entirety? This is frustrating to me. I feel like either I'm not expressing myself very well, or you're just not understanding what I'm saying.
--InsufficientData (talk) 00:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chergles"
Sorry, not trying to argue or be difficult. Will clarify anything you wish. Specific part that I didn't answer. In short, I'm very uncomfortable with enucleation (surgical technique). I'll think of an alternate name that is mutually acceptable. Chergles (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)