→WTF: explain please |
Ice Cold Beer (talk | contribs) →WTF: r |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
:: Wouldn't ask if I did. <strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span></sup>]] 20:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
:: Wouldn't ask if I did. <strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span></sup>]] 20:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
::: Are you going to explain your edit summary? <strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span></sup>]] |
::: Are you going to explain your edit summary? <strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span></sup>]] |
||
::::I'm calling you a dunce for re-inserting the POV tag as an attempt to weaken the credibility of the article. BigDunc + the missing 'e' = BigDunce. [[User:Ice Cold Beer|Ice Cold Beer]] ([[User talk:Ice Cold Beer#top|talk]]) 23:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:22, 9 June 2009
Main ||| Talk ||| Contribs ||| Edit Count ||| RfA ||| Recall
|
Hi, Ice Cold Beer, could you leave your input on this report? I've really tried to assume "good faith" for a while, but he attacked me and harassed editors. So I would appreciate if you come to ANI. Thanks.--Caspian blue 01:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
RFA thanks
TfD nomination of Template:911ct supportersHi Ice Cold Beer — I've done some changes to the template that you have nominated for deletion. This includes adding some functionality, so that the format of the template can be adjusted to the specific needs of an article in which it appears. The lists in the template now have their own navbars, so they can be updated easily. I've also changed the documentation, so that it adresses the BLP and WP:UNDUE concerns. With these changes, the template can be merged with the existing 911ct template, as has been suggested in the discussion. Would you agree to such an approach, so that we can make a joint proposal at the TfD discussion? — Regards, Cs32en 19:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
DeletionWhy'd you delete an entry I created? I created a page for an artist I know, Alan Steinberg, and included links to his Web site, places his work is featured, etc. Why was it deleted so quickly? Oaklandnjb (talk) 08:23, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Oaklandnjb
So how would one enter information about an artist in a way that isn't a blatant ad? Oaklandnjb (talk) 08:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Oaklandnjb
This user, whom you recently blocked, has persisted in using both his user and user talk pages for repeat personal attacks. Would it be wise to protect these pages? Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 02:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Notability of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 TruthHi, Recently you stopped by Talk:Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth#Suggest_merging and voiced your opinion that the subject was not notable. I had presented 9 sources that I believe establish notability. Could you please tell me your opinion on those sources? Thanks! Unomi (talk) 17:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
InvitePlease visit 9/11 talkpage and explain the policies you've called upon in recent summary. Thanks. TheFourFreedoms (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
WTFWhat does that edit summary mean. BigDuncTalk 19:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
| ||