→Indef blocked tagging: Reply |
Tanthalas39 (talk | contribs) →Indef blocked tagging: comment |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
Hey there - you don't have to put the indefblocked template on VOA userpages that have not been created. The point is to have less pages, not more - you only tag them if the user has created a page, which puts it in a category to eventually be deleted. [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]] | [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 17:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
Hey there - you don't have to put the indefblocked template on VOA userpages that have not been created. The point is to have less pages, not more - you only tag them if the user has created a page, which puts it in a category to eventually be deleted. [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]] | [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 17:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
:The reason why I do it is to alert any users who stumble upon the userpage that the account has been indefinitely blocked. Are you saying that you want me to stop doing it? -- [[User:IRP|IRP]] [[User talk: IRP|☎]] 17:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
:The reason why I do it is to alert any users who stumble upon the userpage that the account has been indefinitely blocked. Are you saying that you want me to stop doing it? -- [[User:IRP|IRP]] [[User talk: IRP|☎]] 17:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
::It's not a huge deal, but yes, it's unnecessary and just creates more pages. Any user can see my indefblocked note on their talk page. Don't get me wrong; I highly appreciate your work here. Just giving you friendly advice ;-) [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]] | [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 17:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:12, 29 December 2008
Merry Christmas
Hello IRP! I just wanted to wish you and your family a merry Christmas! May this Christmas be full of great cheer and holiday spirit. Again, merry Christmas! Ashbey 00:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey
15:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Criticism of the Talmud
That was a prod tag, not an AfD; the user is entitled to remove it. Ironholds (talk) 23:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- I was trying to roll my own edit back, but I saw "Rollback failed". I already noticed the mistake, but thanks for letting me know anyways. -- IRP ☎ 23:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleting the article would very improper on your part. Doing so would obviously be an act againist freedom of speech. The articles quotes references, they are in bold type. Deleting would only reveal your bias and fears. There are articles on criticism of many books, but when you do about the talmud, I Jew am accused of being anti-Semite, disgusting. It's not in an essay form, it lists many, many references including profession books, websites, and quotations from books, and Jewish scholars. It is in point form to help make adjustment. I now have a copy of the article so don't think about about trying to delete it I and others will just put back on! It's call presenting different side, or againist that freedom too?--Standforder (talk) 04:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Excuse me? I'm not (and never have) accused you of being an anti-semite. The issue is not to do with bias, freedom of speech or "presenting a different side" but rather about how that information is presented. The bible, for example, is not a reliable source. Please look at the points given here as to the issues with the page. Information should not be kept because of, quote, "freedom of speech"; Wikipedia is not a place for original research and is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Ironholds (talk) 06:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my user page. Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 23:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
uw-rollback
Nice template! But I'm not sure about the formatting, maybe it should be formatted to resemble the uw block templates. Please join the discussion at WT:UTM#New template: uw-rollback. Thanks! Anomie⚔ 04:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Untitled post
sorry i am new — Preceding unsigned comment added by HPS345 (talk • contribs)
- See the introduction to editing. -- IRP ☎ 22:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
i will learn how to do edit in sandbox okay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HPS345 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- That's fine, and if you need any more help, add "{{helpme}}" to the very bottom of your talkpage. -- IRP ☎ 22:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Sorry
About the confusion above, I thought he was putting spam messages around (cut and paste) and did not see them as good faith, now I know they are, I apologize to you as I think you are sorting it out for me. Regards. Andy (talk) 22:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Indef blocked tagging
Hey there - you don't have to put the indefblocked template on VOA userpages that have not been created. The point is to have less pages, not more - you only tag them if the user has created a page, which puts it in a category to eventually be deleted. Tan | 39 17:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)