Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for a major copyright violation. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 06:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for a major copyright violation. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 06:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
||
:I have just deleted the [[Bombing of Germany during World War II]] article you created most of its content had been taken from [http://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=55 this] website. Given the extent of this copyright violation, I have decided to block your account for an ''indefinite'' period. This is not a permanent block, but will remain in place until you demonstrate to me or another reviewing administrator that you have read and understand Wikipedia's policy on copyright and will abide by it in the future - please see [[WP:COPYRIGHT]]. I hope that this block will only be needed for a few hours or days. On a different topic, I also note your reversions of reasonable requests for citations sought by another editor on the entirely spurious grounds that you were enforcing Wikipedia's "anti-troll policy": [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brothers_von_Bl%C3%BCcher&diff=prev&oldid=565046983], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Crete&diff=prev&oldid=565046711] - no such policy exists, and if it did the IP editor's concerns would not fall under its scope. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 06:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC) |
:I have just deleted the [[Bombing of Germany during World War II]] article you created most of its content had been taken from [http://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=55 this] website. Given the extent of this copyright violation, I have decided to block your account for an ''indefinite'' period. This is not a permanent block, but will remain in place until you demonstrate to me or another reviewing administrator that you have read and understand Wikipedia's policy on copyright and will abide by it in the future - please see [[WP:COPYRIGHT]]. I hope that this block will only be needed for a few hours or days. On a different topic, I also note your reversions of reasonable requests for citations sought by another editor on the entirely spurious grounds that you were enforcing Wikipedia's "anti-troll policy": [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brothers_von_Bl%C3%BCcher&diff=prev&oldid=565046983], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Crete&diff=prev&oldid=565046711] - no such policy exists, and if it did the IP editor's concerns would not fall under its scope. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 06:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
::{{user-multi |
|||
|doc=yes |
|||
|User=91.66.11.36 |
|||
|1=t |
|||
|2=c |
|||
|3=dc |
|||
|4=m |
|||
|5=bu |
|||
|6=bl |
|||
}} |
|||
::Also read the policy [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|Sock puppetry]] and state on this talk page that you will abide by it. |
|||
::--[[User:PBS|PBS]] ([[User talk:PBS|talk]]) 07:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:55, 21 July 2013
Welcome
|
- Thank you very much for your assistance! Hyperboreer (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Watching
(Watching: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)
German inventors and discoverers
You seem to be adding links to a German inventors and discoverers page enthusiastically across Wikipedia. This sort of thing is usually done as a category, not as an article - perhaps you could look into this before continuing? Thanks. Djr32 (talk) 19:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the information, I will look into this right away! Hyperboreer 20:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Elvis Presley
It's clear that these sources are disputed, yet you keep adding them. Guidelines suggest that when your edits are reverted, you should justify them on the Talk page, and although you've opened a discussion, you still need to convince the community that your sources are reliable. Meanwhile, you should not edit war to include this content until a consensus exists for its inclusion. The bottom line is that if you add this content again, or links, you will be blocked for edit-warring. Your next station is the Talk page, where you need to make a cogent case for the inclusion of this material. Thanks. Rodhullandemu 00:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Elvis and edit warring
None of the three websites to which you want to link qualifies as a high-quality source—in other words, none of them can be cited in support of any material you might want to add to the text...and you can't add anything to the text without proper citation. Please see our WP:Verifiability policy. In addition, none of the three websites meets our standards for external links. Please see our content guideline concerning WP:External links. Furthermore, your series of repeated attempts to insert these links in the article violates our policy on WP:Edit warring, for which you can be blocked. You would be wise to stop now. Below, I'm posting our standard warning, which also links to our three-revert rule, with which you need to become familiar, right away.
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in Elvis Presley. It appears you may be engaged in an edit war. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you.—DCGeist (talk) 00:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Elvis Presleys Heritage
For many years, it was said that this Presley line descended from David Pressley, who was of Anglo-Irish origin; however, in recent years, this has come under increasing scrutiny and doubt. More evidence now seems to weight that Elvis is actually of German descent from Johannes Valentin Pressler / Preslar (1669-1742) and Anna Christina Frantse / Frantz (1674 - ) This family came to New York in 1709.
According to Donald W. Presley and Edward C. Dunn, both distant relatives of the King, a direct link can be made from Elvis back to a certain Johann Valentin Pressler, a German winegrower who emigrated to America in 1710. Pressler came from a village in southern Palatinate called Niederhochstadt. Niederhochstadt became Hochstadt sometime during the 250 years after Johann Pressler left it, but there are still many Presslers there, among them a winegrower like Johann Valentin. Johann Valentin first settled in New York and later moved his family to the South. The name was Anglicized during the Civil War by a Pressler serving in the Confederate Army, Presley and Dunn report in a forthcoming book on the Presley family.
It is interesting to note that if indeed he is descended from Johannes Valentin Pressler, then he would also be related to former President Jimmy Carter, as Johannes would be their common ancestor.
For some reason, every time I add information about the true heritage of Elvis presley, this is deleted. Is it not "politically correct" to proclaim Elvis GERMAN? Or are there other reasons? I'm willing to learn, please conclude! --Hyperboreer 20:21, 9 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyperboreer (talk • contribs)
- None of the three websites to which you link qualifies as a high-quality source—in other words, none of them can be cited in support of any material you might want to add to the text...and you can't add anything to the text without proper citation. Please see our WP:Verifiability policy. In addition, none of the three websites meets our standards for external links. Please see our content guideline concerning WP:External links. Furthermore, your series of repeated attempts to insert these links in the article violates our policy on WP:Edit warring, for which you can be blocked. You would be wise to stop now.—DCGeist (talk) 00:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Well, DCGeist ("Geist" meaning intellectual spirit ... I hope ...), I understand your criticism and I will consider your suggestions. I regret the fact, that you think the website "German Heritage" is not sufficient, because it is definitely high-quality! Elvis Presley is of dominant German descent - that is a fact. Where exactly is the problem of proclaiming this? In the article French Norman Jewish and so on are noted, there is NO proof of this, but there IS proof of Elvis' German heritage. Do you have a problem with the terminus "German"??? You seem to know what you are doing by Wikipedia, why don't you just clarify the facts and change the article to it's factual version? I would be grateful - and I am sure the users of Wikipedia would be also! --Hyperboreer 12:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Elvis of German descent
- Elvis' German heritage
- More on Elvis
- Please visit German-American Heritage Museum in Washington D.C. and learn more about Elvis' German ancestory
- So you want to mention that Elvis had ancestors that immigrated in 1710? Not sure if this is relevant at all, 1710 is way to far back to think that its an influence on his life...I would also note that the references you have provide state that he has Scottish, English, Native American, German, Jewish and South African descent. So what we see is you trying to highlight hes German ancestry without care of the rest of his family tree. Can you honestly say you think that his German ancestry (from 1710) is worth mentioning in an article that starts in 1935...I would say that hes Christian and Jewish heritage is what was the biggest influence on his life as mentioned in your references above. So should we talk about hes ONE German ancestor from 300 years ago or should we simply can him an American as it is now? Moxy (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- German blood is German blood, no matter WHEN this was given, if Elvis were Jewish (which he is definitely not!!!), then no one would consider deleting HERITAGE, even if it was 2000 years ago, his Jewish descent would be HIGHLIGHTED! Elvis Presley comes from the big and influentual Pressler Family of Germany, he carries a German Surname, this should be noted - not more, not less. He is a German-American, where exactly is the problem??? I thought free-thinking Americans have overcome barbaric anti-German ressentments?! --Hyperboreer 21:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyperboreer (talk • contribs)
- Well, DCGeist ("Geist" meaning intellectual spirit ... I hope ...), I understand your criticism and I will consider your suggestions. I regret the fact, that you think the website "German Heritage" is not sufficient, because it is definitely high-quality! Elvis Presley is of dominant German descent - that is a fact. Where exactly is the problem of proclaiming this? In the article French Norman Jewish and so on are noted, there is NO proof of this, but there IS proof of Elvis' German heritage. Do you have a problem with the terminus "German"??? You seem to know what you are doing by Wikipedia, why don't you just clarify the facts and change the article to it's factual version? I would be grateful - and I am sure the users of Wikipedia would be also! --Hyperboreer 12:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Anna Kreisling, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Kudpung (talk) 15:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oh yes, very well, I am working on it, and I am sure, some Wiki-experts will assist me. Thank you! Hyperboreer 16:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Anna Kreisling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No reliable third-party sources exist to back up the assertions made in this article (not a hoax exactly - probably "myth" is a better description)
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EyeSerenetalk 20:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Anna Kreisling for deletion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/42px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Kreisling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Kreisling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EyeSerenetalk 10:53, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Anna Kreisling
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Anna Kreisling, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Anna Kreisling is a hoax? That shocks and disappoints me, as I initiated the article, I thought (and somehow still do), this is/was a true person with actual achievements. Maybe the future will show the truth, and until then I of course accept the decision! Hyperboreer 21:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Battle of Grunwald.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Battle of Grunwald.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 23:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
List of German inventors and discoverers#Notes
Hello, you recently reverted one of my edits and I have created a section in the talk page to discuss it. Per WP:BRD please provide your opinion, thanks. Reatlas (talk) 11:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- It is the other way around, you removed MY notes from the article I initiated (18 February 2009). The notes are important and must stay. Keep up the good work, but do not remove sections of articles, that have existed for years. Greetings! --Hyperboreer 13:53, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:German postage stamp in honor of Heinrich Göbel.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:German postage stamp in honor of Heinrich Göbel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks for adding the file. I appreciate your upload. Please upload this type of imge at wikimedia commons and inform me. I will add the appropiate information about the file so that it won't be deleted.Regards. Rahman.safwan (talk) 18:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC) -Member of Wikiproject Philately
Disambiguation link notification for June 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Attila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ildikó (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Declarations of War during World War II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roosevelt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elsa Brändström, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilhelmina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bombing of Germany during World War II
Hello Hyperboreer,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bombing of Germany during World War II for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for informing me! --Hyperboreer 13:20, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Blocked for an indefinite period
![Stop icon](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 06:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)- I have just deleted the Bombing of Germany during World War II article you created most of its content had been taken from this website. Given the extent of this copyright violation, I have decided to block your account for an indefinite period. This is not a permanent block, but will remain in place until you demonstrate to me or another reviewing administrator that you have read and understand Wikipedia's policy on copyright and will abide by it in the future - please see WP:COPYRIGHT. I hope that this block will only be needed for a few hours or days. On a different topic, I also note your reversions of reasonable requests for citations sought by another editor on the entirely spurious grounds that you were enforcing Wikipedia's "anti-troll policy": [1], [2] - no such policy exists, and if it did the IP editor's concerns would not fall under its scope. Nick-D (talk) 06:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- 91.66.11.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Also read the policy Sock puppetry and state on this talk page that you will abide by it.
- --PBS (talk) 07:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)