SuzanneOlsson (talk | contribs) →False Information In Times of India article.: new section |
VanishedUserABC (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
History2007, You have brought up the Times of India article several times at the Roza Bal page, as though this is some kind of Gospel and irrefutable proof about something that you repeatedly bring against me. I followed your link and was shocked at that article. I never knew it even existed. It is not the same Times Of India article that had appeared a few years earlier. In part it says this, "Amin said in light of Quranic teachings no Muslim can accept Olsson's theory. The caretaker even filed an FIR against her and got her visa cancelled. "Despite this we used to allow tourists to enter the shrine but we became suspicious when she tried to get curfew imposed in the locality and plant something at the shrine to authenticate her claim." This is absolutely and blatantly a lie. Mr Amin (aka Mr. Ringshawl) is exactly the man who was stealing from the tomb and sold pieces of it to Holger Kersten and to Pakistani agents. In my opinion, he was responsible directly for the death of Bashrat Shaheen. You have done many people a disservice by backing what Mr. Amin says and supporting him. I fear for the trouble you could cause- even at Roza bal tomb and even regarding the efforts to obtain DNA. I truly fear the damage people like you and Mr. Amin bring to this world. [[User:SuzanneOlsson|SuzanneOlsson]] ([[User talk:SuzanneOlsson|talk]]) 18:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Suzanne Olsson[[User:SuzanneOlsson|SuzanneOlsson]] ([[User talk:SuzanneOlsson|talk]]) 18:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC) |
History2007, You have brought up the Times of India article several times at the Roza Bal page, as though this is some kind of Gospel and irrefutable proof about something that you repeatedly bring against me. I followed your link and was shocked at that article. I never knew it even existed. It is not the same Times Of India article that had appeared a few years earlier. In part it says this, "Amin said in light of Quranic teachings no Muslim can accept Olsson's theory. The caretaker even filed an FIR against her and got her visa cancelled. "Despite this we used to allow tourists to enter the shrine but we became suspicious when she tried to get curfew imposed in the locality and plant something at the shrine to authenticate her claim." This is absolutely and blatantly a lie. Mr Amin (aka Mr. Ringshawl) is exactly the man who was stealing from the tomb and sold pieces of it to Holger Kersten and to Pakistani agents. In my opinion, he was responsible directly for the death of Bashrat Shaheen. You have done many people a disservice by backing what Mr. Amin says and supporting him. I fear for the trouble you could cause- even at Roza bal tomb and even regarding the efforts to obtain DNA. I truly fear the damage people like you and Mr. Amin bring to this world. [[User:SuzanneOlsson|SuzanneOlsson]] ([[User talk:SuzanneOlsson|talk]]) 18:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Suzanne Olsson[[User:SuzanneOlsson|SuzanneOlsson]] ([[User talk:SuzanneOlsson|talk]]) 18:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Well, thank you for not suggesting that myself and Amin (whoever he may be) are the same people... But seriously, may I go out on a limb here and suggest a reading of the page [[WP:RS]]? The [[Times of India]] has a circulation of 3 million copies and is what is known as a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] in the jargon used on this celebrated web site. And a few editors here are known to have occasionally browsed the page WP:RS. May I suggest you do that too? And if it is no additional bother please read the page [[WP:V]] as well. As for the death of Shaheen, whoever he may be, please go off and write another self-published book, devise a plot, etc. That might save you having to read the WP:RS page... [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007#top|talk]]) 18:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:41, 8 May 2013
Leave a message if you wish, but please do understand if I do not wade into new discussions.
DYK for Supercomputing in China
The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Consecration and entrustment to Mary
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Areopagus sermon
The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
DYK for HIP 13044 b
Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like this one made over 11,200 hits. Simply south (talk) 11:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Animation database
Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Knowledge of Christ
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Rich Representation Language
rʨanaɢ (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 18:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for PAD emotional state model
Thank you for your help Victuallers (talk) 06:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for NECA Project
Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Holy Name of Jesus
Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Person of Christ
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Right hemisphere brain damage
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Last Supper in Christian art
Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Jesus at Herod's Court
Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Langlois Bridge at Arles
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Wiki-Watch
Thanks for this article Victuallers (talk) 18:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Ascension of Jesus in Christian art
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Imitation of Christ
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Five Discourses of Matthew
Calmer Waters 12:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Supercomputing in Japan
Materialscientist (talk) 16:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for History of supercomputing
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Supercomputing in Europe
EncycloPetey (talk) 08:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Quasi-opportunistic supercomputing
Materialscientist (talk) 10:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Decision fatigue
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Water of Life (Christianity)
Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Eternal life (Christianity)
Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Michaelion
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Left brain interpreter
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:38, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Intercession of Christ
Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Love of Christ
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Supercomputer architecture
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Supercomputer operating systems
--Allen3 talk 17:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Message passing in computer clusters
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Banned editor back?
I wonder if Lloydbaltazar/LoveforMary is back, editing as 38.121.17.167. Esoglou (talk) 16:48, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- You are right. And I am 99% sure. Same location for IP, same pages, same type of edits. These people will never give up. We know that... I just typed on the old SPI ... History2007 (talk) 16:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
False Information In Times of India article.
History2007, You have brought up the Times of India article several times at the Roza Bal page, as though this is some kind of Gospel and irrefutable proof about something that you repeatedly bring against me. I followed your link and was shocked at that article. I never knew it even existed. It is not the same Times Of India article that had appeared a few years earlier. In part it says this, "Amin said in light of Quranic teachings no Muslim can accept Olsson's theory. The caretaker even filed an FIR against her and got her visa cancelled. "Despite this we used to allow tourists to enter the shrine but we became suspicious when she tried to get curfew imposed in the locality and plant something at the shrine to authenticate her claim." This is absolutely and blatantly a lie. Mr Amin (aka Mr. Ringshawl) is exactly the man who was stealing from the tomb and sold pieces of it to Holger Kersten and to Pakistani agents. In my opinion, he was responsible directly for the death of Bashrat Shaheen. You have done many people a disservice by backing what Mr. Amin says and supporting him. I fear for the trouble you could cause- even at Roza bal tomb and even regarding the efforts to obtain DNA. I truly fear the damage people like you and Mr. Amin bring to this world. SuzanneOlsson (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Suzanne OlssonSuzanneOlsson (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Well, thank you for not suggesting that myself and Amin (whoever he may be) are the same people... But seriously, may I go out on a limb here and suggest a reading of the page WP:RS? The Times of India has a circulation of 3 million copies and is what is known as a reliable source in the jargon used on this celebrated web site. And a few editors here are known to have occasionally browsed the page WP:RS. May I suggest you do that too? And if it is no additional bother please read the page WP:V as well. As for the death of Shaheen, whoever he may be, please go off and write another self-published book, devise a plot, etc. That might save you having to read the WP:RS page... History2007 (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)