Gunmetal Angel (talk | contribs) →November 2011: also… |
|||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
::What I was warned for before doesn't even resemble what I'm getting warned for right now. Please notice ''I have never made edit summaries of that nature since the time that even you gave me an insight for them''. This warning on the other hand is pretty damn ridiculous. I mean seriously, to think that starting drama over me saying I removed "fandom crap" is this necessary? Wow, bro • [[User:Gunmetal Angel|<font face="papyrus"><font color="#green">GunMetal Angel</font></font>]] 21:30, 19 November 2011 (UTC) |
::What I was warned for before doesn't even resemble what I'm getting warned for right now. Please notice ''I have never made edit summaries of that nature since the time that even you gave me an insight for them''. This warning on the other hand is pretty damn ridiculous. I mean seriously, to think that starting drama over me saying I removed "fandom crap" is this necessary? Wow, bro • [[User:Gunmetal Angel|<font face="papyrus"><font color="#green">GunMetal Angel</font></font>]] 21:30, 19 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::I wouldn't exactly say that you've "never" made such an edit summary since my previous warning in May of this year. A quick peek into your edit summaries turns up things like: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blood_on_the_Dance_Floor_(group)&diff=prev&oldid=458728684 nobody gives a fuck, read MOS:TM. Jesus Christ]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emarosa&diff=prev&oldid=458712469 real mature, man]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Motionless_in_White_discography&diff=prev&oldid=460202572 Thanks for screwing up the template]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Post-hardcore&diff=prev&oldid=458486882 I'm not going to sort out the biggest unnecessary bullshit little things with you, it started with your electronica drama and now this?]. And these examples are just from this month. This kind of tone is definitely not [[WP:CIVIL|civil]] nor does it [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]. [[User:Fezmar9|Fezmar9]] ([[User talk:Fezmar9|talk]]) 23:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:05, 19 November 2011
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Welcome to my talk page
if you would like, thanks! °•° GmA
- & click here if you would like to take a look at something interesting that I started recently.
Re: Your Warning
Won't happen again. If I ever do, it means I'm pissed off to hell with a user and I want them to know it. But this is unlikely in the future as I OFFICIALLY QUIT EDITING ARTICLES ABOUT ELECTRONICORE BANDS.
Oh, and why are you referring to yourself in third person? Salamibears58 (talk) 21:30, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Salamibears58
- I still think you and Jer are the same person, but that isn't important. Thanks for your time. Salamibears58 (talk) 01:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Salamibears58 P.S. Can I write about this hurdle on my page?
- I'd have been blocked for being a sockpuppet when he was blocked the past few days. So no, we're not the same person, just have a similar taste in music. -Jer Hit me up 01:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Even though you can say we're similar as people in a couple ways, it would be pretty weird to say we're the same person since you know nothing of us personally. I can already bring evidence to the table of how him and I are different as I do not support local bands, Jer does in his town (I mainly don't because almost every band here are douchebags attempting metalcore left and right). Also, I happen to play bass, Jer plays guitar. • GunMetal Angel 03:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'd have been blocked for being a sockpuppet when he was blocked the past few days. So no, we're not the same person, just have a similar taste in music. -Jer Hit me up 01:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Edivence was: You both monitor the same articles and change the same things. Salamibears58 (talk) 13:06, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Dontaskaginalright
So what you're saying is, when somebody agrees and enforces the changes I make over Wikipedia, that person is automatically me? LOL • GunMetal Angel 15:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- God I really hope we aren't the same people, would make stuff like this super weird. Maybe He is also the same person as us too! -Jer Hit me up 18:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not to mention, you also helped me out on the talk page for these guys regarding that TV Tropes wasn't a reliable source, to which I fixed days later because of your input of what I dind't realize. This happened about a week and a half ago? Yeah dude, we are totally the same person, and Kevin is the clone of us both. It only makes sense!!!1! • GunMetal Angel 19:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Pornogrind
NVM, It was unsourced anyways. 98.101.159.65 (talk) 01:38, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
(98.101.159.65 is me.) Salamibears58 (talk) 01:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Salamibears58
TesseracT - SikTh
hey, good job changing the TesseracT page to Tesseract. Could you do it to SikTh too, I've no idea how to!Yellowxander (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
November 2011
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article The Bunny the Bear has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Abhijay Let's have a chat, my friend. 09:55, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- I made no edit summary to that page that is inaccurate or inappropriate. You can't be serious if you think "rv IP fandom crap + other fixes" is an actual problem. Wowowowowow • GunMetal Angel 13:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Eitherways, I have began noticing that some of your edit summaries that you have contributed to other articles, as for example this: [1], are considered inappropriate. When you were blocked for the edit-warring around this year, we editors are not assuming any 'bad-faith' or 'brutality' of any kind. We were simply trying to tell you that your actions were wrong, and were all along the way trying to help you. In addition, this is also a violation of WP:TPO. Deleting or editing legitimate comments, as demonstrated by your act, is considered bad practice for an editor. Instead of deleting this, you may have simply archived it.
Specially, even regarding this [2], 'wtf' is considered inappropriate for your addition to this talk page. How? well, this conversation between the both of us is not motivated by hatred or of any kind. This is simply to help you calm down the edit summary business of yours down a bit. By using 'wtf' You are neither doing yourself any good, nor are you being on the good-side of editors. I understand that everyone makes their mistakes and tend to go over the line, but in your case, you are going all over the line in your edit summaries - some that are using swears and some that are just not making any sense whatsoever. Abhijay Let's have a chat, my friend. 15:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- When you template an established editor, a little ire is understandable. Is saying 'wtf' in an edit summary on your own talk page "over the line"? I certainly don't think so. If you legitimately want to work with Gunmetal on the problem, don't just template him. All it does is piss a frustrated editor off more. Your whole response came off as condescending to me, so you might want to work on your wording if your goal is calming. Falcon8765 (TALK) 20:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- (Talk page stalker) This is not GunMetal's first warning about edit summaries[3]. It seems to be an on going problem. As Abhijay said, these warnings are not assuming bad faith, they're merely meant to make sure that you're aware that your actions go against what Wikipedia's behavioral guidelines suggest. Ignoring these warnings is probably not the most wise of decisions. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- What I was warned for before doesn't even resemble what I'm getting warned for right now. Please notice I have never made edit summaries of that nature since the time that even you gave me an insight for them. This warning on the other hand is pretty damn ridiculous. I mean seriously, to think that starting drama over me saying I removed "fandom crap" is this necessary? Wow, bro • GunMetal Angel 21:30, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- I wouldn't exactly say that you've "never" made such an edit summary since my previous warning in May of this year. A quick peek into your edit summaries turns up things like: nobody gives a fuck, read MOS:TM. Jesus Christ; real mature, man; Thanks for screwing up the template; I'm not going to sort out the biggest unnecessary bullshit little things with you, it started with your electronica drama and now this?. And these examples are just from this month. This kind of tone is definitely not civil nor does it assume good faith. Fezmar9 (talk) 23:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)