KSWarrior8 (talk | contribs) →Thanks: new section |
→OnMobile: ref please |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chzz&diff=prev&oldid=275429391 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 17:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chzz&diff=prev&oldid=275429391 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 17:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Please feel free to put back any parts that you feel are referenced with a suitable reliable source. |
|||
::Thanks, --<small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 19:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::On the above article, you have just reinstated the following fact; |
|||
:::"60-70% p.a revenue growth" |
|||
:::Please could you tell me where the reference is for this information, |
|||
:::Thank you. --<small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 19:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks == |
== Thanks == |
Revision as of 19:55, 6 March 2009
![]() |
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
|
![]() | If you are here to ask me why I deleted your article, please read the common reasons why I have deleted your article. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hey Gogo (if I may; if not, Dr. Dodo?), thanks for reverting this act of spamming. The user is a repeat offender, by now; care to apply a more serious warning? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
May I ask you the reason for your revert? I was undoing an undiscussed, and non-supported merge - not deleting content, which you'll see was returned to Pro-Italian Maltese. If you did not realise this, I would be very grateful if you could revert again. If of interest, the request for page protection I filed is here. Cheers Geocourrier (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Geocourrier. BTW I am not Geocourrier, as you can verify if you wish by CU. All this mess has been created by the "hate toward everything italian" of PiccoloModificatoreLaborioso, who now uses even a french name probably because of that rejection. --Right2 (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
drookie98
I have been informed that Random.Person219 is drookie98. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclarenaustralia (talk • contribs)
- If you look on his userpage it has drookie98 in the Aliases section. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't know until he filled it in. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I said I was informed that it was him, I didn't said if I thought it was true or not. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Mike's Day Off
Lucky you finally did. It's been about ten months since I've seen the episode, so my memory of it is somewhat fuzzy now. The only dilemma was why only this year and not the year it was produced. Because it seemed to me that it followed the rerun of the 200-jobs lookback episode. Also, did you see the episode in 4:3? All I know is that the show switched to 16:9 after the 100 Jobs Special. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
James Teej
Hi, I am not sure as to why the James Teej article is seen as advertising or whatever else is has been deleted for. Pls adivse me as to how I should change this. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecraigon (talk • contribs) 05:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Message from Julianathomas
Thanks for your help and advise.
Julianathomas (talk) 05:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
deleting article
new to wikipedia confused to why our article/page on our band keeps getting deleted maybe you can help we looked at other band sites and added what we thought was enough to start our article Apparently we are doing something wrong. Appreciate the help
(67.117.172.234 (talk) 20:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC))Carbon 9
- The article was deleted because it was blatant copyright infringement. The article also does not establish why the band is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia per the notability guideline. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
OnMobile
Re. declined speedy for OnMobile
A related, very similar speedy was agreed; I don't see this company is notable, and specifically I don't see how this article can be cleaned up to make a valid entry without starting from scratch.
As you decided to decline the speedy, will you be checking all the links to see what portions of the facts they support, or will you be listing the article for AfD?
From a quick glance, I see that there is a long list of awards, which is not supported by a reference; the article, therefore, acts as an advertizement for the company concerned; the mere fact it appears on wikipedia serves to promote the organisation.
Do you believe that the article will be edited to create useful content? Or will nobody bother, and it will sit here promoting the company, thus abusing the principles of wikipedia?
I realise that, technically, it might be possible to find sufficient notability in some obscure financial news item, but I fail to see the value in keeping the article. I would ask you to consider WP:COMMONSENSE, ie what value will this article add to wikipedia.
I hope this doesn't sound too accusatory; that's not my intention. I hate spam, I hate spammers, and I'm fed up of spending hours checking obscure reference links, flagging articles as unreferenced, removing spam links, etc etc, just for an anonymous IP to pop in and reinstate them or put yet another odd reference in, which takes time to follow, and often there is a WP:SRS at the end of it.
Thanks for your time reading this - again, apologies for a bit of a rant,
-- Chzz ► 09:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for helping me out!
KSWarrior8 (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)