correction |
999~enwiki (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
Not all administrators are [[WP:ROUGE|rouge]]. Anyway, I'm not an administrator. Just take a look at my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ANetsnipe user rights log]. It's empty. An administrator has the following entry: "''bureaucrat'' (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for ''user'' from (none) to (none) (=sysop)". There is no grand conspiracy to get you. -- <span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Netsnipe|'''''<span style="background-color: #003333; color:White"> Netsnipe </span>''''']]'''[[User talk:Netsnipe|<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> <sup>(Talk)</sup> </span>]]'''</span> 17:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC) |
Not all administrators are [[WP:ROUGE|rouge]]. Anyway, I'm not an administrator. Just take a look at my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ANetsnipe user rights log]. It's empty. An administrator has the following entry: "''bureaucrat'' (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for ''user'' from (none) to (none) (=sysop)". There is no grand conspiracy to get you. -- <span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Netsnipe|'''''<span style="background-color: #003333; color:White"> Netsnipe </span>''''']]'''[[User talk:Netsnipe|<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> <sup>(Talk)</sup> </span>]]'''</span> 17:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Anti-pagan bigotry == |
|||
Please stop tagging pagan articles claiming "biased" sources. Christian articles may use Christian sources, Islamic articles may use Islamic sources, and Pagan articles may use pagan sources. Unless you are going to start tagging all religious articles for using their own "biased" sources, you are merely showing your ''own'' biases here. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 18:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:That's nice, GB, but as of now, [[WP:V]] allows that use of self-published autobiographical sources in articles about the subject in question. But thanks for "helping." -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 18:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::Please show me exactly where [[WP:V]] says that; nobody else has been able to because it doesn't, it's simply your interpretation. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 18:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:34, 24 August 2006
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
Hi! GBYork 01:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Naughty boy! No commercial links in the articles! - BalthCat 04:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Good job cleaning this article up. Cheers, JYolkowski // talk 20:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
You marked the article Dave Waymer for speedy deletion as a nn-bio. I wanted to let you know that professional athletes at the higher level in their sport (and this would include NFL players) are always considered notable. I removed the speedy and expanded the article. Please take a look at the article and make any improvements that seem appropriate. -- TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Please stay off my talk pages and don't send me any of your welcoming notes
I see what you really are and don't want contact with you. GBYork 01:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Huh? So what am I, go on, really? It's my job to leave a welcome message on people's talk page who haven't received one yet. Sheesh, it's called the Wikipedia:Welcoming committee. So much for Wikipedia:Assume good faith! -- Netsnipe (Talk) 04:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
I'd like an answer please. -- Netsnipe (Talk) 16:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'll assume good faith on your part. Having contact with people around here is dangerous so I seek to avoid it, especially with administrators and I suspect you are one. But maybe you are different from the rest. So I will assume good faith for you. In fact, I'm surprised you answered me, as administrators usually don't, and I am surprised that you are interested in my opinion. GBYork 16:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Not all administrators are rouge. Anyway, I'm not an administrator. Just take a look at my user rights log. It's empty. An administrator has the following entry: "bureaucrat (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for user from (none) to (none) (=sysop)". There is no grand conspiracy to get you. -- Netsnipe (Talk) 17:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Anti-pagan bigotry
Please stop tagging pagan articles claiming "biased" sources. Christian articles may use Christian sources, Islamic articles may use Islamic sources, and Pagan articles may use pagan sources. Unless you are going to start tagging all religious articles for using their own "biased" sources, you are merely showing your own biases here. -999 (Talk) 18:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)