→August 2022: Vandal 3 - you have already been warned about discretionary sanctions |
→August 2022: Vandal 4 and 3 RR warning |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Jammu and Kashmir (union territory)]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 12:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC) |
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Jammu and Kashmir (union territory)]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 12:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Jammu and Kashmir (union territory)]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 12:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Jammu and Kashmir (union territory)]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}<br>Consensus is that there are no flags or emblems used articles on places in the disputed territories - and that the existing map should remain<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->- [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 12:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:46, 4 August 2022
Hi
Discretionary sanctions
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. - Arjayay (talk) 11:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong in my edit. I seperately shown the pakistani administered region in shade and stated it as "not administered"
Jammu and Kashmir is a union territory of India since august 2019 Editor8220 (talk) 12:01, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jammu and Kashmir (union territory) . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Arjayay (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jammu and Kashmir (union territory), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jammu and Kashmir (union territory). - Arjayay (talk) 12:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jammu and Kashmir (union territory) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Consensus is that there are no flags or emblems used articles on places in the disputed territories - and that the existing map should remain- Arjayay (talk) 12:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)