→Indentation: new section |
Caution: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sourced material on Typhoon Bopha (2012). (TW) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::Thanks Earth 100, for your time and edits. The river is so beautiful, I have never seen any, in my life, like this. Cheers.--[[User:Ramon FVelasquez|Ramon FVelasquez]] ([[User talk:Ramon FVelasquez|talk]]) 14:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC) |
::Thanks Earth 100, for your time and edits. The river is so beautiful, I have never seen any, in my life, like this. Cheers.--[[User:Ramon FVelasquez|Ramon FVelasquez]] ([[User talk:Ramon FVelasquez|talk]]) 14:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Nice photos, but i've seen Crystal clear, blue waters in a stream in Lantau island, Hong Kong, clearer than the ones i saw in your photos, and were almost free of brown algae. --[[User:Earth100|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">✯Earth100✯</span>]] [[User talk:Earth100|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk✉)''</span>]] 11:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== What's wrong..? == |
== What's wrong..? == |
||
Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
You really should start indenting your comments on talk pages. It makes conversations harder to follow when you don't. [[User:Inks.LWC|Inks.LWC]] ([[User talk:Inks.LWC|talk]]) 05:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
You really should start indenting your comments on talk pages. It makes conversations harder to follow when you don't. [[User:Inks.LWC|Inks.LWC]] ([[User talk:Inks.LWC|talk]]) 05:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
It's my style, WHY why, why do you care about all this things? --[[User:Earth100|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">✯Earth100✯</span>]] [[User talk:Earth100|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk✉)''</span>]] 11:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Typhoon Bopha == |
|||
Where are you seeing those sources mention annular characteristics or a 30 km eye? [[User:Inks.LWC|Inks.LWC]] ([[User talk:Inks.LWC|talk]]) 11:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Precise measurement. It is 100% true information. Back than when you didn't appeared in the typhoon articles all was going so well...--[[User:Earth100|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">✯Earth100✯</span>]] [[User talk:Earth100|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk✉)''</span>]] 11:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:If you measured it, that's [[WP:OR|original research]]. And there's no mention of it becoming "compact" or "annular". That needs to either be properly sourced or reverted. [[User:Inks.LWC|Inks.LWC]] ([[User talk:Inks.LWC|talk]]) 11:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Nope it isn't and it is true info. Nowadays it's sometimes the source which is wrong. And nowadays, many people doesn't understand who are the experts. --[[User:Earth100|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">✯Earth100✯</span>]] [[User talk:Earth100|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk✉)''</span>]] 11:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:How could you have done a precise measurement? And where is the mention of annular characteristics or becoming more compact? [[User:Inks.LWC|Inks.LWC]] ([[User talk:Inks.LWC|talk]]) 11:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
I didn't say it was and JTWC says it, and i'm an expert. --[[User:Earth100|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">✯Earth100✯</span>]] [[User talk:Earth100|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk✉)''</span>]] 11:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:It doesn't matter if you're an expert. I'm a meteorologist, but I can't just put my thoughts into articles. Neither can you. Give me a quote where it mentions "30 km" and being annular and compact, or I'm going to have to revert it. [[User:Inks.LWC|Inks.LWC]] ([[User talk:Inks.LWC|talk]]) 11:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Fine, goodbye to the end of the "full of true information fully expanded Wikipedia." |
|||
--[[User:Earth100|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">✯Earth100✯</span>]] [[User talk:Earth100|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk✉)''</span>]] 11:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== December 2012 == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]] or [[WP:SYN|novel syntheses]] of published material to articles as you apparently did to [[:Typhoon Bopha (2012)]]. Please cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your contributions. Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-nor2 --> ''Just in case there's a discussion about this later, this should probably be done with an official template. Feel free to delete it if you'd like in lieu of the discussion above.'' [[User:Inks.LWC|Inks.LWC]] ([[User talk:Inks.LWC|talk]]) 12:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:07, 8 December 2012
● Hello! Any comments, suggestions and request are Welcome!
● Any photo cropping, image Rotation, image flipping, photo adjustments, adding text photo captions...etc request are also welcome!
Help please, review my 2nd article
Hi, Earth 100, I was awed by this River, it is simply magic. So, I created my 2nd article Tapuacan River. If you have time, please go over it and review or revise per the Rules. Thanks and cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 14:20, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
I don't review articles, but i can double check them, and contribute them for you. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 14:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Earth 100, for your time and edits. The river is so beautiful, I have never seen any, in my life, like this. Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 14:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- Nice photos, but i've seen Crystal clear, blue waters in a stream in Lantau island, Hong Kong, clearer than the ones i saw in your photos, and were almost free of brown algae. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
What's wrong..?
I believe you must be confused. I didnt revert any of your edits. I reverted Objectivesea's edits, restoring your version of the article as on 18:15, 6 December 2012. However, if there is anything else that might have hurt your feelings, please let me know. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Indentation
You really should start indenting your comments on talk pages. It makes conversations harder to follow when you don't. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
It's my style, WHY why, why do you care about all this things? --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Typhoon Bopha
Where are you seeing those sources mention annular characteristics or a 30 km eye? Inks.LWC (talk) 11:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Precise measurement. It is 100% true information. Back than when you didn't appeared in the typhoon articles all was going so well...--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- If you measured it, that's original research. And there's no mention of it becoming "compact" or "annular". That needs to either be properly sourced or reverted. Inks.LWC (talk) 11:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Nope it isn't and it is true info. Nowadays it's sometimes the source which is wrong. And nowadays, many people doesn't understand who are the experts. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- How could you have done a precise measurement? And where is the mention of annular characteristics or becoming more compact? Inks.LWC (talk) 11:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
I didn't say it was and JTWC says it, and i'm an expert. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if you're an expert. I'm a meteorologist, but I can't just put my thoughts into articles. Neither can you. Give me a quote where it mentions "30 km" and being annular and compact, or I'm going to have to revert it. Inks.LWC (talk) 11:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Fine, goodbye to the end of the "full of true information fully expanded Wikipedia." --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
December 2012
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Typhoon Bopha (2012). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Just in case there's a discussion about this later, this should probably be done with an official template. Feel free to delete it if you'd like in lieu of the discussion above. Inks.LWC (talk) 12:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC)