DYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs) Giving DYK credit for Hamo (Dean of York) on behalf of Casliber |
→Another of Dana's to watchlist: new section |
||
Line 459: | Line 459: | ||
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#20 February 2015|20 February 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Hamo (Dean of York)]]''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the dispute over '''[[Hamo (Dean of York)|Hamo]]'''{{`s}} appointment as treasurer of [[Diocese of York|York]] was resolved when [[Burchard du Puiset|his opponent]] gave him [[Alne, North Yorkshire|a church]] instead?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Hamo (Dean of York)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hamo (Dean of York)]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Hamo (Dean of York)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Hamo (Dean of York)]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Hamo_(Dean_of_York)&datefrom=2015-02-01&dateto=2015-02-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201502/Hamo_(Dean_of_York) daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]]. |
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#20 February 2015|20 February 2015]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Hamo (Dean of York)]]''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the dispute over '''[[Hamo (Dean of York)|Hamo]]'''{{`s}} appointment as treasurer of [[Diocese of York|York]] was resolved when [[Burchard du Puiset|his opponent]] gave him [[Alne, North Yorkshire|a church]] instead?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Hamo (Dean of York)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hamo (Dean of York)]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Hamo (Dean of York)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Hamo (Dean of York)]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Hamo_(Dean_of_York)&datefrom=2015-02-01&dateto=2015-02-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201502/Hamo_(Dean_of_York) daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]]. |
||
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 12:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC) |
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 12:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Another of Dana's to watchlist == |
|||
[[Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971]]. Editor who has never touched the article suddenly making massive rewrite of a GA-class article, They raised one legit issue, which I fixed. Need more eyes because of course I'm just an article owner who doesn't know jack shit about the topic, as usual... :-P [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 07:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:04, 22 February 2015
Archive 1 May 2007 to Jan 2008 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Happy New Year!
Dear Ealdgyth,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").
John Appleton
Hi Ealdgyth, thanks for looking at the GAN for John Appleton - I was leaving this for Michael Jester to respond to as he is both the inspiration behind the article and its single largest contributor of content. Unfortunately Michael seems to have stopped editing on January 5.
It's been a couple of weeks since your review, and the time for comments is well and truly up. But if possible, can I request that the review be left open another couple of days? I did the peer review for this article last year and still have the sources somewhere about the place. If I dig these out again I can hopefully address the points you raise. -- Euryalus (talk) 02:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, I meant to fail that - I even put that on the review page ... but it appears to have not been totally finished. HOw about I finish off that detail and you find and fix the issues, and ping me when you renominate it. I'll do a second review then. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
On your "copy edit"
Hi, a few months ago I put some information into the article on the Gregorian mission. You removed the information but seemed to have accidentally typed in the edit summary that it was a copy edit. Could you explain why you removed it? Bosstopher (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure... sometimes glitches happen. However, looking at it... what does it really tell us about the mission itself or the cult of the saints involved in the mission? It might be useful an article on Gregory - but it's a very poor fit where it is. It's tacked on to the information about saints cults ...it's not clear what "instructions" it is referring to - since the paragraph is concerning Bede's approach to Gregory's imputus to the mission - nothing about Gregory's instructions is mentioned there. Also - if Gregory's instructions were really considered canon law by the AS church - why the hell did they not move the archiepiscopal see to London? (And later allow a third archbishopric?) I've never seen anyone else say that the instructions were considered canon law by the AS church ... Lastly - and this is a pet peeve - it's a featured article. Is it THAT difficult for people to actually conform the citations to the style used in the article ... rather than just putting it in however? The article has a pretty clear style - short citations with author's last name, short title of the work and page numbers in the text and then a fuller reference in the references section. It makes more work for the editors maintaining a featured article (which must have a consistent citation style) if folks can't be bothered to at least try. All in all - it's not a very good fit. I'm not sure why you thought it fit there well at all. (And it would fit better in an article on Gregory than in the mission article also). Ealdgyth - Talk 15:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback. Really sorry about the citation thing, it completley failed to occur to me at the time. The edit was the result of trawling through old essay notes trying to find something to put into wikipedia, which I guess isn't really the best way to go about editing. I guess I'll try and trudge up the book I got that from, and see if i can find more information on it to put in the Gregory article instead. Bosstopher (talk) 15:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- When I worked up the mission article - I think I read just about everything I could find on the subject. I'm sure I missed minor mentions in some works but... I read a lot. And I've worked on a lot of articles in the time period, so while it's not a specialty (I like the Anglo-Norman period better), it's an area I'm pretty familiar with. I'd have run across the idea of it being canon law if it was a common theme. It's not a big worry - but I maintain a number of featured articles and good articles and it's just ... a lot of work... when you've got so much to watch out for. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
That time again...
Anyone have access to this from PNAS? Ealdgyth - Talk 22:37, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- New Scientist?
- Also from New Scientist? Ealdgyth - Talk 22:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Apparantly I like New Scientist. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nos. 3 and 4 on their way to you (unless you've changed your email address?). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 01:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Hermeneutic style
Any comments on Hermeneutic style at Wikipedia:Peer review/Hermeneutic style/archive1 gratefully received. Dudley Miles (talk) 15:10, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
RS Question
Hey Ealdgyth, where does http://www.theequinest.com sit in the realm of WP:RS for wiki? This question per [1]. Seems we had issues about using the site, but I can't recall why. Help? Montanabw(talk) 02:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'd say ... no. The about page doesn't give names or anything. Looks like a personal site to me. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
DYK for William Pantulf
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,350 | Aaliyah (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
17 | Bishop of Sodor and Man (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
11 | R. W. Southern (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
8 | Adam Orleton (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
376 | Book of Common Prayer (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
2 | Katharine Keats-Rohan (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
84 | Fancy mouse (talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
1 | George Valesente (talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
36 | Decision model (talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
82 | Shield wall (talk) | Expand | ||||||
8 | Eleanor de Guzmán (talk) | Expand | ||||||
13 | Abbey of Sainte-Trinité, Caen (talk) | Expand | ||||||
201 | Rule of Saint Benedict (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
272 | Horse breeding (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
131 | History of Protestantism (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
86 | Economy of England in the Middle Ages (talk) | Merge | ||||||
109 | Purebred (talk) | Merge | ||||||
47 | Jenny (donkey) (talk) | Merge | ||||||
6 | Tevis Cup (talk) | Wikify | ||||||
356 | Christianity in India (talk) | Wikify | ||||||
11 | Humbert III, Count of Savoy (talk) | Wikify | ||||||
1 | NorthAmerican Sportpony (talk) | Orphan | ||||||
1 | Ann-Mari Lindberg (talk) | Orphan | ||||||
1 | Aki Daitō (talk) | Orphan | ||||||
4 | Richard Beauchamp (bishop) (talk) | Stub | ||||||
3 | John Ford (bishop) (talk) | Stub | ||||||
0 | Wayne G. Sayles (talk) | Stub | ||||||
2 | Nicholas Close (talk) | Stub | ||||||
2 | Ralph Walpole (talk) | Stub | ||||||
2 | Hewlett Thompson (talk) | Stub |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Brace for drama
And you are going to be in on this one, dearie! See [2] Someone reverted this individual and warned him, but if s/he wants to kick up a fuss, well lovely. ;-) Montanabw(talk) 18:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments. And by the way, you rock! Montanabw(talk) 03:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk about a hypocrite!
Regarding your edits in the Lipizzan article: A few weeks, ago you insisted on the alphabetical ordering of languages with the following revision note:
"alphabetize - so it's fair to all the various countries"
Fair enough. Yet when I alphabetized the breeding associations, you reverted the edit with the following comment:
"nationalistic "must have first" ordering"'
However, the only difference between the two alphabetized lists was that you apparently didn't like the resulting order of the alphabetized list in the second instance. In other words, you only seems to care about "principles" when they go your way. You truly are a disgrace to Wikipedia.
(Oh, and you managed to revert three other, undisputed revisions simply to prove your point.)--LJU2ORD (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Ealdgyth, this editor has also dragged me to ANI over this: [Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Pattern_of_abusive_behavior_from_Montanabw] Montanabw(talk) 19:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- (ec) Oh, good gods. Go away. Austria comes before Slovenia. Trying to make sure that Slovenia is first (and also removing the "now" in "via the Lipica stud that is now located within its borders") shows that it's just more of the same that is so frequent at this article. Ealdgyth - Talk 20:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Hamo (Dean of York)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Another of Dana's to watchlist
Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971. Editor who has never touched the article suddenly making massive rewrite of a GA-class article, They raised one legit issue, which I fixed. Need more eyes because of course I'm just an article owner who doesn't know jack shit about the topic, as usual... :-P Montanabw(talk) 07:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC)