Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==Edit-warring warning== |
==Edit-warring warning== |
||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Blue Army (Poland)]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian|talk]]) 22:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC) |
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Blue Army (Poland)]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian|talk]]) 22:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
==You are mentioned here== |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:E-960_reported_by_.5B.5BUser:Template:Faustian.5D.5D_.28Result:_.29] [[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian|talk]]) 04:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:48, 23 November 2015
Discretionary sanctions notification - Eastern Europe
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:31, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Template:Z33
Disambiguation link notification for September 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brick Gothic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brookline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Sock-puppetry check
Hi E-960, I opened a sockpuppetry investigation regarding you and COD T 3, after Faustian's comment, and you can view the investigation and defend yourself here. I'm really sorry if you haven't used sock puppetry, but at this point there seems to be enough evidence that it's impossible to ignore. On the bright side of things, if you're not a sock, an investigation will clear your name. -Darouet (talk) 18:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- @E-960: My apologies, it seems a previous investigation found that you are not a sock puppet of COD T 3. -Darouet (talk) 00:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Edit-warring warning
Your recent editing history at Blue Army (Poland) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Faustian (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)