(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 230:
Line 230:
''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}}
{{clear}}
== Lack of Good Faith ==
Your words and actions as well as your attitude towards me over the past 24 hours demonstrate you lack good faith, kindness, and good will towards people of dispositions other than your own. Check yourself. This is my only warning to you. I am only a messenger. Good luck. [[User:Haerdt|Haerdt]] ([[User talk:Haerdt|talk]]) 12:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
== You’re not a sock, you’re a napkin ==
Your words and actions as well as your attitude towards me over the past 24 hours demonstrate you lack good faith, kindness, and good will towards people of dispositions other than your own. Check yourself. This is my only warning to you. I am only a messenger. Good luck. [[User:Haerdt|Haerdt]] ([[User talk:Haerdt|talk]]) 12:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Revision as of 12:08, 31 December 2020
The current date and time is 19 June 2024 T 15:43UTC.
Discretionary sanctions alerts
You can email me from this link but in the interests of Wiki-transparency, please message me on this page unless there are pressing reasons to do otherwise.
Comments which I find to be uncivil, full of vulgarities, flame baiting, or that are excessively rude may be deleted without response. If I choose not to answer, that's my right; don't keep putting it back. I'll just delete and get annoyed at you.
Coming here to ask why I reverted your edit? Read this page first...
Welcome to my talk page! I am an administrator here on Wikipedia. That means I am here to help. It does not mean that I have any special status or something, it just means that I get to push a few extra buttons to help maintain this encyclopedia.
If you need help with something, feel free to ask. Click to start a new topic.
If I have not made any edits in a while, (check) you may get a faster response by posting your request in a more centralized place.
If you want to ask for help, you can ask at the help desk for questions about Wikipedia, and at the reference desk for more general questions. You may also simply ask a question on your talk page and add {{helpme}} before your question. This will attract the attention of experienced users who will most likely be able to help you.
Did I delete your page, block you, or do something else that I should not have done?
First, please remember that I am not trying to attack you, demean you, or hurt you in any way. I am only trying to protect the integrity of this project. If I did something wrong, , but remember that I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please keep your comments civil. If you vandalize this page or swear at me, you will not only decrease the likelihood of a response, your edits could get you blocked. (see WP:NPA)
When posting, do not assume I know which article you are talking about. If you leave a message saying "Why did you revert me?", I will not know what you mean. If you want a response consisting of something other than "What are you talking about", please include links and, if possible, diffs in your message. At the very least, mention the name of the article or user you are concerned with.
Also, if you sign your post (by typing four tildes - ~~~~ - at the end of your message), I will respond faster, and I will tend to be in a better mood, because unsigned comments are one of my pet peeves.
If you are blocked from editing, you cannot post here, but your talk page is most likely open for you to edit. To request a review of your block, add {{unblock|reason}} to your talk page. (replace reason with why you think you should not be blocked.) I watch the talk pages of everyone I block, so I will almost definitely see you make your request. If I am making edits (check Special:Contributions/Doug Weller) and I do not answer your request soon, or you cannot edit your talk page for some reason, you can try sending me an email. Please note, however, that I rarely check my email more than a few times a day, so it may be a couple of hours before I respond.
Administrators: If you see me do something that you think is wrong, I will not consider it wheel-warring if you undo my actions. I would, however, appreciate it if you let me know what I did wrong, so that I can avoid doing it in the future.
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Paul Staines
Hello, Doug Weller. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
Overall winner
1st - $500
2nd - $200
3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Hello, Doug Weller. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hello, Doug Weller. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
hi
I did not remove anything from Secession in the United States.I added two sections. Check once. Thank
God Jul och Gott Nytt År!
Yo Ho Ho
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!
Hello Doug Weller, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:24, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
user:Binksternet is edit warring and has violated the 3RR. He is also removing sourced content--2601:3C5:8200:97E0:B03E:E0D7:FE7C:7A1B (talk) 20:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker)I think you need to be more careful about your charges. Binksternet made an edit, which you reverted. I see two reverts by Binksternet and three by you today. You also misrepresented Binksternet's first edit by claiming that it removed sourced material. - Donald Albury 21:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But he did remove sourced material. College rock is sourced as being jangle pop.--2601:3C5:8200:97E0:793A:1031:8357:5838 (talk) 21:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for informing me about the restrictions, regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict articles. I'm just wondering, did I edit anything I wasn't supposed to? I'm pretty sure I was very careful and only posted an edit request on the article's talk page without changing anything that has to do with the main article. Ziad Rashad (talk) 04:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Now for something completely somewhat different...
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:38, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Happy holidays
Luminarias
Happy Holidays!
Hi Doug Weller, May your holidays be merry and bright, and hope you have a happy and healthy 2021
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
---Wikaviani (talk)(contribs) 15:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A good faith editor who may be a problem
The editor who made this edit has been quite busy creating much work for others, but thankfully has not crossed the 500 edit mark yet!
I've just left copious messages on their Talk, but I wonder if it might be better if some bot reverted everything they have done in the realm of finding citations. A bunch of inapt refs is worse than multiple instances of "citation needed", since it gives the impression that a statement is supported and can be trusted. Reviewing their work involves diving into a bunch of disparate sources, plus the usual mechanics of reversion. I'd prefer not to be the one to do this massive cleanup.
I wish somebody had determined the editor's level of ability before turning them loose. If this person has interests, they should have been sounded out on what they like to read about before letting them take pot luck with whatever articles need citations. I'd love to hear your feedback.--Quisqualis (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I explained why I edited. Do not pretend you didn't see it
December 2020
As a matter of fact, Talk pages are expressly for ipen discussion and to deny this priveledge to editors goes against common sense and established Wikipedia precedent. If you do not appreciate other intelligent people freely and openly expressing views contrary to your own, you should leave the Wilipedia project. This is an Open Encyclopedia. It is not a grounds for censorship or totalitarian thought suppression. Despite your personal political beliefs, we are attempting to keep a neutral, unbiased encyclopedia. You have been reminded. Haerdt (talk) 04:03, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a democracy. You have no "civil liberty" here. Wikipedia is nothing but an encyclopedia. Any community you may find in this place arises for the furtherance of the goals of Wikipedia to create an international, crowd-sourced encyclopedia. It is not social media, either. People who seek attention here will find Wikipedia a frustrating experience.
If Wikipedia ever tolerated or encouraged open discussion on talk pages, the inadvisability of such a practice surely hastened its termination. There is a precedent of hanging horse thieves in the US, but it does not mean we must continue to do so today.--Quisqualis (talk) 04:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Adding source/refs for new information on Dating of Mahabharata
Have you read/listened to the evidence and research Nilesh Oak has put together around dating of Mahabharata and Ramayana ?
Or, are you just going by him being a chemical engineer and not an academic ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by S raghu20 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@S raghu20: I'm going by our policies and guidelines, read WP:VERIFY and WP:RS and if you still think he's a reliable source challenge me at WP:RSN - which is the appropriate noticeboard. Doug Wellertalk 16:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You’ve been reported,. I may not be following the exact coding procedure. Excuse me. I understand you are a senior editor and you may think you have some clout, but I do not appreciate the obnoxious approach you took to censoring my content. Don’t
be a fascist. The preservation of knowledge neutrally and with a high degree of fairness is important. Be kind.
Happy new year. Haerdt (talk) 02:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your words and actions as well as your attitude towards me over the past 24 hours demonstrate you lack good faith, kindness, and good will towards people of dispositions other than your own. Check yourself. This is my only warning to you. I am only a messenger. Good luck. Haerdt (talk) 12:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You’re not a sock, you’re a napkin
Your words and actions as well as your attitude towards me over the past 24 hours demonstrate you lack good faith, kindness, and good will towards people of dispositions other than your own. Check yourself. This is my only warning to you. I am only a messenger. Good luck. Haerdt (talk) 12:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]