Content deleted Content added
→Gabor B. Racz: it's all BS, POV, generalizations that were dismissed by the original GA reviewer TWICE |
|||
Line 251: | Line 251: | ||
::::3) has content not supported by the references. |
::::3) has content not supported by the references. |
||
::::It is far from being a GA. [[User:Doc James|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Doc James|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Doc James|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Doc James|email]]) 19:19, 9 July 2015 (UTC) |
::::It is far from being a GA. [[User:Doc James|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Doc James|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Doc James|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Doc James|email]]) 19:19, 9 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
It's easy to list general statements that point to nothing. An accomplished reviewer and writer of numerous GAs and FAs disagreed with you twice and you refuse to drop the stick. |
|||
*The language is not puffery - it is factual and it is sourced. |
|||
*It was never copyright infringement - that claim is unwarranted. You are not acting in GF and this is a terrible reflection on you considering your status on WP. |
|||
*It does not have content that is unsupported by references. I have asked for the specifics and all I get are generalizations and POV from you. |
|||
I am really disappointed to see such behavior. What you're doing is trying to create instability and cause the article to be delisted. That is downright shameful. This is retaliatory, nothing more. A lot of editors are aware of it, too. <font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">[[User:Atsme|Atsme]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Atsme |📞]][[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]]</sup> 19:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC) |