Major Bonkers (talk | contribs) →Yet more ban evasion: Hello |
→Yet more ban evasion: talk page |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:David; bad idea. Give enough rope and you'll hang yourself. It was a bad idea to post on my page and the tone of the post above is too sharp. I can see it's frustrating, but going about it this way is a dead end. Please consider. --[[User:Major Bonkers|Major Bonkers]] <small>[[User_talk:Major Bonkers|(talk)]]</small> 10:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC) |
:David; bad idea. Give enough rope and you'll hang yourself. It was a bad idea to post on my page and the tone of the post above is too sharp. I can see it's frustrating, but going about it this way is a dead end. Please consider. --[[User:Major Bonkers|Major Bonkers]] <small>[[User_talk:Major Bonkers|(talk)]]</small> 10:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
I've contacted ArbCom about this, yet again. And the answer is that you are not about to be unblocked any time soon. You already know this, as you've contacted them enough times already yourself. Thus, I'm going to blank and protect this talk page for a finite period in just a short while. If you need to appeal, you can email ArbCom - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 15:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:38, 26 June 2008
This User is NOT a sock of Sussexman, or anyone else. David Lauder (talk) 12:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Yet more ban evasion
David, see this? That's you logging out to evade your ban. Not only that, but you're pretending to be someone else again. I know you're going to deny it, etc, etc but it is you. That's Confirmed, for the record. When are you going to stop this dishonesty? - Alison ❤ 22:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Its not dishonesty at all. You are exceptionally provocative with your language. It is me replying to lies. Surely some sort of facility should be made whereby I can do that instead of people making all sorts of spurious and untrue accusations all over Wikipedia about me which you are suggesting I should just sit back and take like someone in the stocks. Your idea of justice is fatally flawed as the entire processes against me demonstrate. My contributions to Wikipedia have never been an issue. So just what is the great big issue against a good contributor? I know that the real answer is: it doesn't matter because we finally managed by hook or by crook to get rid of someone we just didn't like. Its about time you people 'got a life'. David Lauder (talk) 12:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
I would also direct you to the statement on User:Counter-revolutionary's Talk Page under 'Thoughts'. David Lauder (talk) 12:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- David; bad idea. Give enough rope and you'll hang yourself. It was a bad idea to post on my page and the tone of the post above is too sharp. I can see it's frustrating, but going about it this way is a dead end. Please consider. --Major Bonkers (talk) 10:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I've contacted ArbCom about this, yet again. And the answer is that you are not about to be unblocked any time soon. You already know this, as you've contacted them enough times already yourself. Thus, I'm going to blank and protect this talk page for a finite period in just a short while. If you need to appeal, you can email ArbCom - Alison ❤ 15:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)