Frickative (talk | contribs) |
Jismstainedthong (talk | contribs) take ur fagggot bullshit else where |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User talk:Ctjf83/Header}} |
|||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:Ctjf83/Archive index|mask=User talk:Ctjf83/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} |
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:Ctjf83/Archive index|mask=User talk:Ctjf83/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
Revision as of 17:07, 9 January 2011
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
I've passed you on criterion 3, you should be wary of failing to get promotion through lack of interest! It may be worth poking other reviewers to look at this article, and to make comments Fasach Nua (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, CTJF83 chat 15:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I will try to take a look at it in the next 24 hours or so. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, CTJF83 chat 21:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I have been watching the discussion on Davenport becoming a FA article and I have a few suggestions that I am expressing directly to you instead of on that page. I thought about making these changes myself but since I am fairly new at editing I will only suggest the changes. You may want to update the Dashboard as it is still displaying an old version of the article. The current one still has the flag and seal. Although it is not mandatory you may want to look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline for rewording and/or restructuring the headings to conform. Some of the sentences are long in length and may need to be broken up. The article has a good pictures but may be slightly right side location heavy. You may want to add the template {{As of}} in places where you state so and so holds the office of ... or anything that can be dated. I realize you update the article regularly but other editors may not be aware of that. On another subject you may be interested in [this link]. Good luck on the Davenport getting FA status.
--RifeIdeas Talk 23:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)- LOL, let's get that new flag going!...please, feel free to fix any changes, I will implement your suggestions after dinner. Do you know how to update the dashboard? This is the first time I ever clicked on the link. CTJF83 chat 00:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Know how to update the Dashboard? I'm the newbie here! I bookmarked all the tools used in that toolbox for future use because I have not been able to find any list of toolserver tools. I tried without success to find a tool that will tell you the average size in bytes of an editors edits, not number of edits. If you know of one let me know. Just to clarify I believe in the right of people in general to express their personal preference in partners. The facts are that statistically 10% of the world's population prefer to be with their own sex. However I am in the 90% category.
--RifeIdeas Talk 00:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Know how to update the Dashboard? I'm the newbie here! I bookmarked all the tools used in that toolbox for future use because I have not been able to find any list of toolserver tools. I tried without success to find a tool that will tell you the average size in bytes of an editors edits, not number of edits. If you know of one let me know. Just to clarify I believe in the right of people in general to express their personal preference in partners. The facts are that statistically 10% of the world's population prefer to be with their own sex. However I am in the 90% category.
- LOL, let's get that new flag going!...please, feel free to fix any changes, I will implement your suggestions after dinner. Do you know how to update the dashboard? This is the first time I ever clicked on the link. CTJF83 chat 00:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- I have been watching the discussion on Davenport becoming a FA article and I have a few suggestions that I am expressing directly to you instead of on that page. I thought about making these changes myself but since I am fairly new at editing I will only suggest the changes. You may want to update the Dashboard as it is still displaying an old version of the article. The current one still has the flag and seal. Although it is not mandatory you may want to look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline for rewording and/or restructuring the headings to conform. Some of the sentences are long in length and may need to be broken up. The article has a good pictures but may be slightly right side location heavy. You may want to add the template {{As of}} in places where you state so and so holds the office of ... or anything that can be dated. I realize you update the article regularly but other editors may not be aware of that. On another subject you may be interested in [this link]. Good luck on the Davenport getting FA status.
- Thank you, CTJF83 chat 21:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I will try to take a look at it in the next 24 hours or so. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Rating NRHP articles
Hi, CTJF83 (nice banner up there btw), I noticed that you added some project tags to a few articles written at the end of December 2010 by User:Farragutful. Examples include Edward C. Roberts House, Renwick House, Benjamin Nighswander House, and a few others that popped up in the NRHP new article result bot list. It's good that you are adding article tags to articles like these so we can keep track of just how many NRHP articles there are out there, but I don't really agree with your rating. You rated all of these articles start quality, when they should really be stub. Any article with only 2-3 sentences of content is by definition a stub. Start quality articles have more information than stubs but are still not good enough to warrant C or B class ratings. An example by the same author (which I was surprised you didn't assess) is First Presbyterian Church of Marion, Iowa. First Presbyterian Church (Muscatine, Iowa) is kind of on the border between stub and start (and you can see I assessed it stub-class). I would rate anything smaller than the FPC Muscatine article a stub and anything longer a start. I was just letting you know in case you weren't familiar with the assessment scale. I don't mean to attack or demean you in any way; this is meant solely as advice. Like I said, it's good to add project tags to these articles, but be careful when you're rating them, or the articles may not be focused on like they should be if they're already rated higher. Quality-driven editors are more likely to upgrade a stub-class article than a start-one, so it's better to rate these short two-sentence articles as stub. Thanks for helping out!--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 21:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm mostly only concerned with articles listed at NRHP Scott County, Iowa, so that's why I didn't rate the other ones. If you had asked me what I would rate the two you listed, I would have bumped each up a notch. to C and Start class. I guess there is a fine line between Stub, Start, and perhaps C. CTJF83 chat 15:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Stalker on Mel Odom (artist) talk page
Can you help us? Mary Cross doesnt like any edits that involve fashion doll called Mdvanii who has been an obvious inspiration for Mel Odom (artist) and Gene Marshall. He/she is also reverting any edits and doing unwanted edits regarding this issue on pages Mel Odom (artist), Gene Marshall and Mdvanii. After he/she was banned from reverting the edits she started endless chat on Mel Odom (artist) talk page clinging on to the 1990 NYT articles obvious mistake which has nothing to contribute to Mel Odom's notability. We have brought out all the evidence but the user is ignoring it all. Muotinukke (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry...how exactly would you like me to assist you? Trying to get Mary Cross to stop? Weigh in on the conversation? Other? CTJF83 chat 18:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Please stop Mary Cross...he/she is obviously sabotaging the articles, trying to insist on a clear mistake made by the NYTs which has long been dealt with and the reality (Lala designed and crrated all Mdvanii makeups since the beginning) confirmed endlessly over the 22 years of Mdvaniis existance. It is clearly noted in museum catalogues (for which we have put the most recent), many articles including L'Hebdo which is like the Time magazine of Switzerland and there has never ever been mention of it in any official press releases, catalogues etc....the artists BB* & Lsala ALWAYS repeat over and over any artists involvements, such as Gruau, Alexandre de Paris, Cylde Smith etc....Odom was mentioned once and only once, by error in the NYTs in 1990 more than a year after Mdvanii was launched....all of her original catalogues, all the FAO Schwarz and Liberty of London catalogues and press releases plus the big show in Canada Grand Tra La la, none of them mention him, even the third party opinion agreed.....MAry Cross is just sabotaging the advancement of the articles.....and trying to turn a factoid (as inthe Norman Mailer definition) into history.....it was an error and recognized as such,...even by Odom himself as he said he was disappointed the make up was never used ..... Please stop or block Mary Cross or do whatever is appropriate please. Thank you. Alec jiri (talk) 19:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I suspect he is doing it only for the purpose of stalking or challenging anything related to Mdvanii on these pages. And the endless discussion on the Mel Odom page over the tiny detail ,suprisingly, involves Mdvanii. He doesnt seem to care about Odom. I would welcome any administrative input from you to stop him/her doing all this. If you can weight in conversation, I welcome that too.. many thanks!! Muotinukke (talk) 19:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well I'm not an admin, so I can't block the user. The best I can do for you (you can also do it) is warn the user for their disruption. Either a vandalism warning, or a 3RR warning, as the situation deems necessary. I will watch the pages in question, and the user's edits, so that I may help in the warning process. Sorry I can't be of more help. CTJF83 chat 20:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I suspect he is doing it only for the purpose of stalking or challenging anything related to Mdvanii on these pages. And the endless discussion on the Mel Odom page over the tiny detail ,suprisingly, involves Mdvanii. He doesnt seem to care about Odom. I would welcome any administrative input from you to stop him/her doing all this. If you can weight in conversation, I welcome that too.. many thanks!! Muotinukke (talk) 19:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Mary Cross seem to have backed off for now. We'll let you now if we stil need your help in this matter. Thank you again! Muotinukke (talk) 20:07, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
why in god
why in god did u delete my question? i needed help finding a defenseless episode! dag nabbit!
69.236.166.22 (talk) 04:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
P.S. if u reply to this message, leave a talkback template on my talk.
- Wikipedia is not a forum for general questions about the show, or any topic, it is for building and maintaining the encyclopedia. Also, a simple Google search would give you the answer. :) CTJF83 chat 04:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC)