letting you know. |
The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk | contribs) →Topic ban: new section |
||
Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
:::Replied on my talk-page in more detail. [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="brown">Mr</font><font face="verdana" color="red"> T</font>]][[User talk:Mrt3366|<font size="1"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Mrt3366|action=edit§ion=new&preload=User_talk:Mrt3366/new_section}} <font color="green"><sup>(New thread?)</sup></font>]</span> 14:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC) |
:::Replied on my talk-page in more detail. [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="brown">Mr</font><font face="verdana" color="red"> T</font>]][[User talk:Mrt3366|<font size="1"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Mrt3366|action=edit§ion=new&preload=User_talk:Mrt3366/new_section}} <font color="green"><sup>(New thread?)</sup></font>]</span> 14:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
::::Have you seen [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_incivility.2C_personal_attacks.2C_violations_of_talk_page_guidelines_by_Fowler.26fowler|this]] yet? [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="brown">Mr</font><font face="verdana" color="red"> T</font>]][[User talk:Mrt3366|<font size="1"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Mrt3366|action=edit§ion=new&preload=User_talk:Mrt3366/new_section}} <font color="green"><sup>(New thread?)</sup></font>]</span> 09:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC) |
::::Have you seen [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_incivility.2C_personal_attacks.2C_violations_of_talk_page_guidelines_by_Fowler.26fowler|this]] yet? [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="brown">Mr</font><font face="verdana" color="red"> T</font>]][[User talk:Mrt3366|<font size="1"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Mrt3366|action=edit§ion=new&preload=User_talk:Mrt3366/new_section}} <font color="green"><sup>(New thread?)</sup></font>]</span> 09:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Topic ban == |
|||
Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=514048552&oldid=514047828 this], under the discretionary sanctions in place for caste articles, I am banning you for 6 months from all articles and discussions falling under [[WP:GS/Caste]]. If you have any questions regarding scope, ask me and I'll clarify it for you. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights|<font face="MS Mincho" color="black">話して下さい</font>]]) 18:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:06, 22 September 2012
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Re: Icche
No, I generally don't nominate articles for DYK. Recently I have talked with Crisco who is a DYK expert with many DYKs under his belt. Though he gave a detailed reply my concentration diverted there. And about DYK, this article is not the best with some inconsistency. The name of Manasi's son is "Souvik" according to website and Shamik according to Times of India (something like that). I have created few more articles (most probably 6) after Yesterday's Icche. Some of those may have DYK components. reply in my talk page or addd tb --Tito Dutta ✉ 15:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- The name is actually Samik or Soumik according to most sources. If you haven't seen the movie, it will be extremely hard to complete the plot. Otherwise, the article has a lot of scope for expansion. For DYK, the articles need a minimum 1,500 characters of prose (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists etc.). This article has about 950 or so characters. So it could have been a potential DYK if you or some other editor had actually seen the movie. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 15:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. When you recently edited Samkhya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tantric and Siva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 10:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Need help
Two well-meaning editors have, I think, misunderstood my edits on India and reverted it twice. Please neutrally comment on the talk page here and help me navigate through this gloomy phase. In your judgement, I trust. The reverter did not look closely at my additions and that's what spurred the argument I guess. I simply don't understand why my edits were reverted in the first place. Yes, I know what I could have done but I just don't get what I did wrong. Help! Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 16:08, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- IMO, you should have started the discussion by posting the diffs to the changes you made to the content. I don't think it will be hard to get a consensus on the updated GDP figures or the net change (after RP removed some of your content) in the society section. Your changes to the content were positive, so start from there and then move on to the images. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 04:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Talkback at Talk:India. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 09:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- I don't understand why Chipmunkdavis is complicating the matter further. I asked him specifically whether or not it will be okay for me to implement the changes 2 (article 17 of Indian constitution) and 3 (India's nominal gdp) he says discuss it there. Man, what does he expect me to do more? I told him I already initiated the section which clearly states the changes I will bring. Case 1 is still under consideration because it's somewhat controversial, but case 2 and case 3 are objective and factual. BTW, I am still awaiting a reason as to why not make the change. Should I go without his permission, I don't need it anyway because nobody is the owner of the article. What do you say? Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 06:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- You can go ahead and make changes per Case 3. Wording of Case 2 is still under discussion along with Case 1. But Case 3 was discussed, all the issues were taken care of and no further objections were raised by anyone. I would call this consensus. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 07:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Can I retract my proposal 1, as it seems now it won't be solved due to Fowler's forum-like way of discussing that are to some extent impertinent to the topic and quite digressive. Has it passed the "no-turning" point? He is protracting the hassle gratuitously. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 07:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Check out my new proposal. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 07:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Can I retract my proposal 1, as it seems now it won't be solved due to Fowler's forum-like way of discussing that are to some extent impertinent to the topic and quite digressive. Has it passed the "no-turning" point? He is protracting the hassle gratuitously. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 07:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- You can go ahead and make changes per Case 3. Wording of Case 2 is still under discussion along with Case 1. But Case 3 was discussed, all the issues were taken care of and no further objections were raised by anyone. I would call this consensus. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 07:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- I don't understand why Chipmunkdavis is complicating the matter further. I asked him specifically whether or not it will be okay for me to implement the changes 2 (article 17 of Indian constitution) and 3 (India's nominal gdp) he says discuss it there. Man, what does he expect me to do more? I told him I already initiated the section which clearly states the changes I will bring. Case 1 is still under consideration because it's somewhat controversial, but case 2 and case 3 are objective and factual. BTW, I am still awaiting a reason as to why not make the change. Should I go without his permission, I don't need it anyway because nobody is the owner of the article. What do you say? Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 06:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Talkback at Talk:India. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 09:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 11:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 11:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- That fowler guy is not behaving well. Replied to the posts. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 13:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Replied, what to do then? Except for fowler I think everybody seems to agree on the proposal with some modification. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 14:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Reply here. It's not going to be easy. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 06:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- What are your views on this removal of content? - a highly acclaimed illustrated book with text 'India Unveiled', probably the only book ever published in the Western world to have been officially recognized by a Prime Minister of India, a book written by Robert Arnett categorized as "Hindu nationalist garbage" (without any discussion)? wow? This is by the way backed by another book "The Role of Native Culture and Language" according to which, Will Durant says, "India is the Motherland of our race and Sanskrit the mother of Europe's languages." So I don't think it's entirely baseless, yet it was reverted.
- Reply here. It's not going to be easy. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 06:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Replied, what to do then? Except for fowler I think everybody seems to agree on the proposal with some modification. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 14:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- In the article Caste in one of his edit summaries (check the edit) he wrote, "I'm sorry India remains "the" paradigmatic example" of caste system, although we know that it is far from the truth.
He also writes in Talk:India that "Caste, the social inequality deeply embedded in Hinduism now for over two thousand years, is the burden of Hinduism alone".
Is he not the classic definition of anti-Hindu, anti-India or what? Check his contributions and you will hopefully see that there is something disingenuous. This fowler&fowler is behaving awkwardly, to say the least. See this discussion for more knowledge about the mode of thinking of this editor. He has experience and that gives him a certain amount of leverage but that leverage is being abused, I think, to pursue a more disingenuous agenda. He labels anybody who disagrees with him as either "Hindu nationalist", "Biased" or something like that. He is unnecessarily brusque. Why is that? Why is he so filled with spite against Hinduism? Does it sound similar to a group we know? Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 06:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- "All this seems as bit wasteful for an addition of one or two lines to the section." - what do you mean? I couldn't fathom it. Explain it here to avoid clutter in the discussion page. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 08:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- It means you won't have it easy. This discussion will last longer than Talk:Caste and will require lot of hard work in terms of collecting sources, arguing from them etc. Remember what you said We need to do something about it and it need not be so painful. That is what this is going to be. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 08:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- What do you suggest then? (I am willing to test my tenacity.) Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 09:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- I created a a list of 20 largest cities in India. Feel free to modify or change it with care. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 11:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- What do you suggest then? (I am willing to test my tenacity.) Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 09:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- It means you won't have it easy. This discussion will last longer than Talk:Caste and will require lot of hard work in terms of collecting sources, arguing from them etc. Remember what you said We need to do something about it and it need not be so painful. That is what this is going to be. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 08:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- "All this seems as bit wasteful for an addition of one or two lines to the section." - what do you mean? I couldn't fathom it. Explain it here to avoid clutter in the discussion page. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 08:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- In the article Caste in one of his edit summaries (check the edit) he wrote, "I'm sorry India remains "the" paradigmatic example" of caste system, although we know that it is far from the truth.
Comment on this. I made the change about adding the template. Others who are opposing apparently have no other reason apart from "it looks aweful/ugly". Your feedback is needed. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 13:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Okay I posted a copy of the new template, tell me if it's okay or not. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 15:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 09:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 09:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
My undo
Sorry, I undid your subsectioning because I was getting confused. I am tired and about to go to bed. If you want you can recreate that section. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 05:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for notifying me. I've also created a new section for your proposal on Talk:Caste. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 06:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Neo-Advaita
Hi, I believe the concept is a hoax created by one of the user and is now adding links and references to main article to make it look as real , I have already asked for deletion of the main article , how to go from here ? Shrikanthv (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks like a hoax. Sorry, I didn't bother to check the main article. I have deleted the section from the article for now. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 08:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Please read Talk:Neo-Advaita. The term "hoax" seems inappropriate to me. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 09:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- I have replied at Talk:Neo-Advaita. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 09:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Please read Talk:Neo-Advaita. The term "hoax" seems inappropriate to me. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 09:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Thanks for notifying me , It seems that lot of self published sources and blogs are trying to build a philosophy of western advaita concept and coining it as neo-advaita ubelievalbe but qouting sayings from some of Indian philosphers (who never imagined this term ) , however as wiki is concerend they have not got any suffecient coverage yet in any media or other sources , they may have to wait until it is wiki notable ready Shrikanthv (talk) 13:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Please have a look at Talk:Neo-Advaita. IMO, Neo-Vedanta is a more popularly used term to describe the philosophy of Swami Vivekananda, Radhakrishnan and even Brahmo Samaj. Neo–Advaita is probably just a neologism used to critique modern gurus in the west. Let's wait for Joshua Jonathan's final word on this. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 13:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
AN/I
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mrt3366 (Talk page?) 09:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- I have added WP:COUNTRIES to my watchlist. I'll wait for other editors to comment. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 11:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Message added Mrt3366(Talk?) 06:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Message added 06:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mrt3366(Talk?) 06:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Yoga (Lead Section)
Greetings, thanks for taking the time to add content to the lead at Yoga - however you have removed the WP:LEAD template without any discussion. I have added it again pending the outcome of further discussion. I have also reviewed the Quality Issues (Lead) section on the talk page about some of the issues. Thanks. --Yoga Mat (talk) 13:28, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- We are discussing the issue on the talk page. Please don't add templates in the middle of the lead section of a GA article because you don't like it. Regards. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 14:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, firstly I feel that posting a Edit war notice on my talk page is inappropriate in these circumstances. My action was to simply bring notice to the quality issues in the Introduction and you in fact turned it into a battle by removing the template without further discussion. Please note 1) I did not remove any of your contributions which are still there 2) GA status can reassessed at anytime and 3) I was very careful only to add the notice to the lead section - not to the overall article which I think is good. Your tone is overly hostile and I refute your idea that my edits were due to my "Not liking it" which is unfounded and seems like a very juvenile attitude to me. Please - let us be civil - remove the "friendly" notice from my talk page which is deemed as an aggressive action in terms of etiquette and let us work together to get the introductory section representative of the entire article as per WP:LEAD. I have no axe to grind here and look forward to making further improvements. Thanks. --Yoga Mat (talk) 16:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- I request you once again to give specifics as to what is wrong with the lead. See the article talk page for further details. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 16:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, firstly I feel that posting a Edit war notice on my talk page is inappropriate in these circumstances. My action was to simply bring notice to the quality issues in the Introduction and you in fact turned it into a battle by removing the template without further discussion. Please note 1) I did not remove any of your contributions which are still there 2) GA status can reassessed at anytime and 3) I was very careful only to add the notice to the lead section - not to the overall article which I think is good. Your tone is overly hostile and I refute your idea that my edits were due to my "Not liking it" which is unfounded and seems like a very juvenile attitude to me. Please - let us be civil - remove the "friendly" notice from my talk page which is deemed as an aggressive action in terms of etiquette and let us work together to get the introductory section representative of the entire article as per WP:LEAD. I have no axe to grind here and look forward to making further improvements. Thanks. --Yoga Mat (talk) 16:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Mind taking a look
Hi CK, I saw your mssg on Sitush's talk page, in reply to my posting there. Do you mind taking a look the the draft Kaul article in my sandbox here. Do leave some comments on the draft articles talk page. Also, in case you feel that minor edits can help improve the article, please feel free to change or modify the draft. Any suggestions on furter improvement of the article are most welcome. -Ambar (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding the process is getting spiral and exceedingly time-consuming. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:India".The discussion is about the topic Template:Largest cities of India. Thank you! --Mrt3366(Talk?) 09:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Have you read this yet?
Since you're already on that page. Have you read the following?
There are four images and a few lines which can be scrolled by easily. I'm sorry but I'm having trouble accepting the Sacred Cow argument. It certainly adds information. Looking at the table I also have trouble seeing it as a distraction much less an eyesore. There is no comparison between the template and this: complex graphical map of urban population centers. I've reviewed this: File:Political map of India EN.svg and again there is no comparison with the template. Clicking on a state or territory brings up no population data. Right now the only feasible compromise made so far is a collapsible template or another template. I find the collapsible idea a brilliant compromise if feasible. I still find it difficult to understand how such a small template with nothing but facts and four images can create this much entrenchment. Are the parties willing to investigate both these compromises? [Jobberone (talk) 02:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)]
|
The no image collapsed template isn't good enough for fowler. Mrt3366(Talk?) 10:16, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Also check out what Steve and AVC wrote on talk of India. Mrt3366(Talk?) 10:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
We can choose/pick images later. This is just a demonstration:
Largest urban agglomerations in India by population (2011 census) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | City Name | State/Territory | Population | Rank | City Name | State/Territory | Population | ||||
1 | Mumbai | Maharashtra | 18,414,288 | 11 | Kanpur | Uttar Pradesh | 2,920,067 | ||||
2 | Delhi | Delhi | 16,314,838 | 12 | Lucknow | Uttar Pradesh | 2,901,474 | ||||
3 | Kolkata | West Bengal | 14,112,536 | 13 | Nagpur | Maharashtra | 2,497,777 | ||||
4 | Chennai | Tamil Nadu | 8,696,010 | 14 | Ghaziabad | Uttar Pradesh | 2,358,525 | ||||
5 | Bangalore | Karnataka | 8,499,399 | 15 | Indore | Madhya Pradesh | 2,167,447 | ||||
6 | Hyderabad | Andhra Pradesh | 7,749,334 | 16 | Coimbatore | Tamil Nadu | 2,151,466 | ||||
7 | Ahmedabad | Gujarat | 6,240,201 | 17 | Kochi | Kerala | 2,117,990 | ||||
8 | Pune | Maharashtra | 5,049,968 | 18 | Patna | Bihar | 2,046,652 | ||||
9 | Surat | Gujarat | 4,585,367 | 19 | Kozhikode | Kerala | 2,030,519 | ||||
10 | Jaipur | Rajasthan | 3,073,350 | 20 | Bhopal | Madhya pradesh | 1,883,381 |
seems okay? Mrt3366(Talk?) 15:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 10:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mrt3366(Talk?) 10:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
This is the problem I see with some of the images proposed there, (intentional or not) misplacement of images and undue weight to contextually insignificant things. I think if you want to assert that "There are some 1.5 million potters in rural India, most of whom have no landed property" — which by the way may or may not be best suited for economy section of a summary style article — what is the need for highlighting it with an image of a potter and his wife in Madhya Pradesh? Won't a link to the article about pottery suffice?
Again if you wish to focus on Indian railways why not focus on one of the largest railway termini in India? There is far more than enough focus on the sheer rurality of India and the half-nakedness of the poor population. Why is this needless predilection? Why this maniacal focus on the gloomy-looking portions of the country/populous when there are numerous better alternatives available about the same subject/category? India is getting urbanized and westernised, this article must depict this fact along with every thing else. "India is the world's second-largest producer of silk" as well as "the largest consumer" — but the one shown in the picture is half-naked....I am wondering "why???"
"The Indian silk industry employs some 6 million workers" - seems fine? "some of whom are child labourers" - there he goes, see? Why not simply state the facts and somehow refrain from shoehorning POVs in Image captions?? I think this is getting a bit too much. I am telling you. Mrt3366(Talk?) 12:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but there is a process underway for selection of images. The same points can be raised then. In any case, the images will only be selected after votes and some hard bargaining like in DRN (I'm guessing here). Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 12:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- There is a straw-poll in a discussion where you were involved. Mrt3366(Talk?) 14:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- I will not be taking part in any more DRN nonesense, sorry. I'll leave a more detailed reply later. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 14:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- There is a straw-poll in a discussion where you were involved. Mrt3366(Talk?) 14:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
DRN Closure notice
Like I told you it's a wastage of time and energy. The DRN failed, how about that?? Hahahahaha!!!! What a surprise, right? The DRN was closed with the following.
Three of the main parties in this dispute, Fowler&Fowler, AVC, and Mrt3366, the filing editor, have expressed a desire to close the DRN. Any thoughts? It looks like the filing editor has gone ahead to create an RfC on the issue. The discussion is currently spread between three locations (Talk:India, the DRN case, and the RfC page), which is a practice that is not encouraged.
— User:So God created Manchester
I thought you should know this. Mrt3366(Talk?) 07:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- That is a pretty decent close compared to what was being proposed when I walked out of the discussion. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 08:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- Talkback on my talkpage. Mr T(Talk?) 12:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Fowler is in a huff, because he thought we were exchanging marriage vows maybe and could never have got out of that "bond" (predicated on the highly intimate dispute resolution) no matter how hard we tried.
Hahahaha!!!! I admit it's a pathetic joke. Hahahahaha!!!!!!!! Mr T(Talk?) 12:19, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Fowler is in a huff, because he thought we were exchanging marriage vows maybe and could never have got out of that "bond" (predicated on the highly intimate dispute resolution) no matter how hard we tried.
- Talkback on my talkpage. Mr T(Talk?) 12:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian religions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 09:49, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 08:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
again. Mr T(Talk?) 08:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Topic ban
Per this, under the discretionary sanctions in place for caste articles, I am banning you for 6 months from all articles and discussions falling under WP:GS/Caste. If you have any questions regarding scope, ask me and I'll clarify it for you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)