Brett Favre article |
SarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs) Friendly note... |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
I replied to you at my talk page. Regards, [[User:Skybunny|Skybunny]] 23:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC) |
I replied to you at my talk page. Regards, [[User:Skybunny|Skybunny]] 23:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Friendly note... == |
|||
You might want to review [[WP:NPA]] before someone decides to ban you.--[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] 01:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:32, 22 August 2007
D.D Lewis
Ok my bad i also did it with Paul Smith (football player) of the Broncos But i removed it when you told me about the D.D Lewis article. Taylor21 07:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks.
Hey Thanks for the pointers Taylor21 07:52, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD comment
This is in response to your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power pitcher: "It's like a wrong convention in here." Who are you to say that our opinions are wrong? Look, I know I've supported you in the past, but just because you have one opinion doesn't mean everybody else is wrong because they share a different opinion, okay? Ksy92003(talk) 04:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- When it comes to which side is more logical, one is right and wrong.►Chris Nelson 05:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Even if that's so, that's not something for you to determine, and that comment doesn't do anything to serve in the AfD discussion. It appears that you made that comment in the choice of words that you did because the final five users to give their opinion all voted keep. Since you said delete, would you like it if I just came out and said "No, Chrisjnelson, you're completely wrong?" You have to flip the table before making a comment and think if somebody said this to me, would I be offended? before leaving controversial comments, such as this one.
- And when it comes to which side is more logical, there is no right and wrong. There is simply a logical solution and a more logical solution. There are valid points for each, generally, and one is no more right nor wrong than the other.
- I'd also like to point out that in this recent debate between Jmfangio and I, you made a couple similar comments: "You're wrong" and "False." You can just completely invalidate other people's opinions or views on disputes and conflicts just because you share a different opinion. I can't speak for all the people who voted keep on the debate, but as for myself, I took your "It's like a wrong convention in here" in quite a negative fashion. I wouldn't consider it a personal attack by any means, but it did feel like a put-down to me. Ksy92003(talk) 06:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
I've seen your edit you've made to this article, adding the undrafted year in the infobox. It seems like it works perfectly, and I don't see how it would cause any problems. Ksy92003(talk) 22:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- One would imagine.►Chris Nelson 22:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well not to mention, you'd think it'd be obvious to everyone that the majority of editors here that do NFL stuff would be in favor of this information being present - in fact, I'd say nearly all of them would be. If Jmfangio has some minor tweaks about how it appears and stuff, that's fine. But I see no reason to change the basics, like what it says or the field we use in the template. I think he's obviously just against it because it was my edit - it happens all the time now.►Chris Nelson 22:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- That last part relates to me, as well. This is what led to his Three-revert violation on Dick Lane (American football). He said my edits were disputed, as well as claiming that I knew they were (how does he know what I think?), and reverted it just because those edits were made by me, I think. Would he have made the reverts if anybody else made the edit? Probably not. Ksy92003(talk) 23:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- The dude can hold a grudge.►Chris Nelson 23:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well now, if he says that it isn't gonna work or shouldn't be implemented, you can show him the Tony Romo article infobox and prove him wrong... something I would suggest, but you know if one of us posts his talk page he is just gonna delete it. I mean the Tony Romo article is proof enough that it works and contributes greatly by saying that he wasn't drafted in 2003, rather was signed as an undrafted free agent. Ksy92003(talk) 23:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Well he knows what it looks like and how it works, he's still opposed to it.►Chris Nelson 23:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Incivility
At WP:ANI another user has pointed out your continued incivility. Please note that according to Wikipedia's block policy, "persistent gross incivility" is possible grounds for a block. Thank you, David Fuchs (talk) 23:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
MLB roster template change
FYI: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball#Template roster change X96lee15 02:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
NFL MVP Awards
If you look at wiki itself, under NFL MVP awards, you will note that there are or were at least 4 or 5 different awards. the only "true" NFL MVP award was awarded by the NFL itself from 1937-1946. Of the other awards, some are no longer awarded, but (for example) the PFWA NFL MVP award was awarded during the years in question.
Since the career highlights box to the right on the Favre page shows the breakdown of awards (AP, Bert Bell, UPI, etc) It's only proper to qualify the awards in the text of the article also.
Otherwise the article conveys the mistaken impression that the NFL itself awarded favre three awards.
I assume it's you that keeps undoing my changing of the Favre page to reflect that the MVP awards received were from the Associated Press.
Meatpuppet
I read at User talk:B that Jmfangio believes that you and I are meatpuppets... what are meatpuppets? Well, whatever they are, I haven't done anything against Wiki-policy, so I don't see why I'm being accused of anything. Do you know what meatpuppets are? Because I haven't a clue. Ksy92003(talk) 06:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know. Sounds sexy.►Chris Nelson 10:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Read WP:MEAT. Jmfangio accuses me of recruiting you to edit to support my causes just because our editing styles are similar. They aren't that similar. You do football tempates and stuff, and I do baseball. We have had just as many arguments as we've had non-argumentative discussions. So I don't see how we possibly could. I mean just because you and I have had disagreements with Jmfangio, he thinks we're doing something illegal. If I do something that completely annoys both B and User:Jmfangio, does that instantly make them meatpuppets? This is a ridiculous claim by Jmfangio. Ksy92003(talk) 17:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
"Hard Knocks" screenshots
Yeah, I made these screenshots myself. I didn't get them from a website. I recorded the program with TiVo and uploaded it to my computer, and took screens of the program. I understand if they'll be deleted, but to be honest, I don't think they harm the program or HBO in any way. But hey, whatever. I hate the whole picture uploading stuff anyways because it's almost impossible for me to find ones that fall into the category of Wiki pictures. Conman33 20:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Brett Favre article
I replied to you at my talk page. Regards, Skybunny 23:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Friendly note...
You might want to review WP:NPA before someone decides to ban you.--SarekOfVulcan 01:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)